BlueBelle
Chief Bluebagger
Re: 37. Jake Edwards
Bad news for Jake. He is our for the rest of the season with an ankle injury.
Bad news for Jake. He is our for the rest of the season with an ankle injury.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Bad news for Jake.Bad news for Jake. He is our for the rest of the season with an ankle injury.
Bad news for Jake.
Is Jacobs a chance to be elevated and debut?
Bad news for Jake. He is our for the rest of the season with an ankle injury.
Have I missed something?According to the Melbourne board we have offered him a 2 year deal, and Melbourne has offered a 3 year deal.
Given our forward line (our only line with some depth) we would have to entertain it.Hope we don't lose him. If given opportunities, will be a player.
If this was true, what would we get for him?
Given our forward line (our only line with some depth) we would have to entertain it.
Given our forward line (our only line with some depth) we would have to entertain it.
I agree. I think we should keep him, but I'm not convinced the original post has landed in the right thread.We'd be remiss to trade him for draft picks. Wouldn't take a 2nd rounder for him because he has shown he has talent, whereas whoever we pick up in the second round, who knows what we'll get. A decent youngster is what I'd want for Edwards if a trade were to happen. Still, as you've said we have depth in our forward line. Do we really want to trade away part of that depth in Edwards?
I agree. I think we should keep him, but I'm not convinced the original post has landed in the right thread.
Why would the Dees offer a 3 year deal to a guy who hasn't debuted and has been patchy at best in the VFL.........looking for the logic...........
Well that would be amazing if true.I'm just the messenger... quote from the Dees board, from a Richmond supporter:
29th August 2007, 21:26 #11
RodneyDangerfield
BigFooty Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Melbourne
Club: Richmond
Re: Trade/Draft/Delist
Hope you don't mind me posting guys.
I know a kid at Carlton,Jake Edwards.Loads of ability,injury plagued season.
Carlton offered him another two years,as have Melbourne.Interestingly though melbourne have come again with three.
I actually trust that poster - so what he says would be correct. As he is family friends with Butch and Jake.I'm just the messenger... quote from the Dees board, from a Richmond supporter:
29th August 2007, 21:26 #11
RodneyDangerfield
BigFooty Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Melbourne
Club: Richmond
Re: Trade/Draft/Delist
Hope you don't mind me posting guys.
I know a kid at Carlton,Jake Edwards.Loads of ability,injury plagued season.
Carlton offered him another two years,as have Melbourne.Interestingly though melbourne have come again with three.
According to the Melbourne board we have offered him a 2 year deal, and Melbourne has offered a 3 year deal.
It's irrelevant.If this is true. What would you be expecting to get for him. It would surprise me if u got anything more than a 3rd-4th round pick
Do you think Edwards can play more than five games in the seniors in '08 if he's lucky?
I don't see him playing CHF next year, so where would he fit into our plans next year?
I thought about Edwards being used a CHB or defender earlier this year, but he really doesn't have the size to play down there. Obviously Austin, Waite, Setanta, Bower and Jamison will get a crack at a spot in the backline before Jake.
I don't know where Jake fits into the team ATM.
Is he contracted past next year?