Surely will get a holiday for his hit on dempster in the second quarter was a bit of a dog act behind the play
-
AFLW 2024 - Round 8 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Jake King
- Thread starter marcus1232
- Start date
- Tagged users None
tigs2010
Pick 1...
Lick, lick, lick...
...them tears are as juicy brucey would say 'delicious'. Just like Milne elbowing Rance in the head.
...them tears are as juicy brucey would say 'delicious'. Just like Milne elbowing Rance in the head.
- Jan 3, 2012
- 47,026
- 96,517
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Chelsea FC, Victory, All Blecks,
jko'neal
Cancelled
Milne in trouble as well. King had a shocker and can't remember the hit on Dempster, but holy shit the umps hate him. Can't buy a free even if they are clear as day, and if he farts towards someone he gets pinned for it.
Can't believe some of the shockers King was at the end of. Can't tell me that umpires don't have personal bias and blatantly show it.
Boiled Geezer
Senior List
- Aug 13, 2009
- 254
- 118
- AFL Club
- Essendon
- Banned
- #6
Think he's in more trouble for when he tripped Milne by deliberately kicking his leg the wing in the 3rd quarter. This kind of stuff can break someone's leg, if the AFL is serious he should get serious weeks for it. The fact there wasn't even a free kicked called was staggering.
Also remember a hit behind play in the 3rd quarter right on the Saints 50m line near the boundary. King is a disgusting piece of work and a blight on the game. The new Steven Baker.
Also remember a hit behind play in the 3rd quarter right on the Saints 50m line near the boundary. King is a disgusting piece of work and a blight on the game. The new Steven Baker.
- Jul 23, 2010
- 5,801
- 4,230
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
Can't believe some of the shockers King was at the end of. Can't tell me that umpires don't have personal bias and blatantly show it.
Agree with this. Gets the short end of the stick from the umpires week in, week out.
peejay
Brownlow Medallist
Your guy did this against us three weeks back and nothing happened.
Kingy was merely performing a public service in attempting to detain a suspected fugitive. Deserves a citizen's commendation.
You think that's bad, the MRP have it in for him much worse!
I wonder if you thought the same when Paddy Ryder did the same thing against Mebourne. I'm sure in Ryders case it was just a reflex action and nothing in it!!!
that defence has been used in the past and been successful. Fletcher tried to use the same defense a week later and got weeks...MRP and tribunal are an interesting lot.
IMO i think a trip by foot should be an immediate 1 game suspension, regardless of reflex action. It is dangerous. I haven't seen Ryder's, but if that is that case, then yes he deserves a week as well.
telsor
Hall of Famer
Done for the trip only.
1 week ( if he pleads or not )
Other incidents Assessed:
Contact between Richmond's Jake King and St Kilda's Sean Dempster from the second quarter of Friday's match was assessed. The ball was being kicked into the Richmond forward line to player Robbie Nahas when King blocked Dempster from going to the contest. It was the view of the panel that King's actions were not excessive or unreasonable in the circumstances. No further action was taken.
Contact between St Kilda's Stephen Milne and Richmond's Alex Rance from the second quarter of Friday's match was assessed. It was the view of the panel the force used was below that required to constitute a reportable offence. No further action was taken.
1 week ( if he pleads or not )
Other incidents Assessed:
Contact between Richmond's Jake King and St Kilda's Sean Dempster from the second quarter of Friday's match was assessed. The ball was being kicked into the Richmond forward line to player Robbie Nahas when King blocked Dempster from going to the contest. It was the view of the panel that King's actions were not excessive or unreasonable in the circumstances. No further action was taken.
Contact between St Kilda's Stephen Milne and Richmond's Alex Rance from the second quarter of Friday's match was assessed. It was the view of the panel the force used was below that required to constitute a reportable offence. No further action was taken.
kitchendweller
Debutant
So he should.
Had the free been paid I wouldn't care but that was a fair stuff up from the umps, among many.
Had the free been paid I wouldn't care but that was a fair stuff up from the umps, among many.
