http://www.news.com.au/sport/afl/ha...ain&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=Sport_Desktop
Well if he was getting protected as much as that weak flopping dog lamb maybe he wouldn't have been pinged fr for 7 frees.
These blooz flogs are celebrating this win like a prelim final.
Schmook's article on the AFL site suggests he hasn't got a real grip on the English language also. In an article he writes Jed Lamb was pestering the young Hawk. Pests pester, and when they do you whack them, and that stops the pestering, buy the umpires didn't agree with Sicily doing that, so free to Lamb.
Now, Nathan the word you were looking for was interfering, and if the umpires were doing their job diligently, hat would have been a free the other way.t
Last edited: