Player Watch Jamie Elliott

Remove this Banner Ad

Good lord

They are baffled as to how he got it, not the extremely common injury that is a vascular injury by DVT. You know how many thousands of people get this every day? You think they performing some form of lab experiments on Jamie Elliot or something?

Maybe even more of a fearmonger then Tom Morris by the sounds of it

I didn’t know Swipey had a burner account.
 
Good lord

They are baffled as to how he got it, not the extremely common injury that is a vascular injury by DVT. You know how many thousands of people get this every day? You think they performing some form of lab experiments on Jamie Elliot or something?

Maybe even more of a fearmonger then Tom Morris by the sounds of it

Can you point to somewhere that reports this diagnosis as fact?


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
 

Log in to remove this ad.

View attachment 2010991


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

So you’re saying Tom Morris ended up the way he did because his Dad didn’t know the difference between “effect” and “affect”?

Big news if true.

In b4 someone jumps in and says “it doesn’t matter because all language is just a human construct, and we are mostly just empty space between electrons of which we can only identify their location or path, but not both simultaneously”.
 
The messaging around Elliott continues to be at odds with each other IMO.

First injury update on the Collingwood website containing news on Elliott was on May 13th:

Collingwood forward Jamie Elliott will spend some time on a modified training program as he manages a minor vascular issue.

After experiencing foot soreness last week, the concern was initially believed to be back related but further assessment has revealed a treatable vascular issue.

Elliott will see vascular specialists for further prognosis and treatment.

Collingwood Head of High-Performance Jarrod Wade said:

“Disappointing news for Jamie who will spend two to three weeks on a modified training program as he recovers from a vascular issue. In positive news it is not a significant issue, and it is treatable.

“While Jamie recovers and receives treatment, he will be able to train and will continue to keep his fitness.

Next update on May 20th:

Collingwood forward Jamie Elliott will continue to spend some time on a modified training program as he manages a minor vascular issue.

The 31-year-old has been in consultation with vascular specialists and he has seen improvements in his conditioning work.

Elliott is expected to return between Rounds 13-16.

May 27th update:

Collingwood forward Jamie Elliott continues to work through a modified training program as he manages a minor vascular issue.

The 31-year-old continues to complete treadmill and bike work away from the group. Elliott is expected to return between Rounds 13 and 16.

Latest update 4th June:

Jamie Elliott’s vascular issue is progressing well and is almost resolved. The forward is on a modified training program which includes indoor pool and treadmill work. Elliott is expected to complete outdoor running later this week.

The 31-year-old is expected to return in six to eight weeks.

We were initially told it was only a minor vascular issue and was treatable.

Okay we can accept this initial diagnosis might have been wrong but it was only last week it was still being stated he could return anywhere between King's Birthday and round 16.

Fast forward to yesterday and suddenly he'll miss another 6 to 8 weeks with the main reason of conditioning being given.

Alas go back to the first update and Wade specifically states he will be able to maintain his fitness and further updates state he's been doing a modified program.

I highly doubt a player who last played just over a month ago and one who was already a supreme athlete now needs up to a further 8 weeks to gain full match fitness. That makes no sense to a lay person let alone when Wade has specifically stated previously that wouldn't be required.

So what's really going on?

The more plausible explanation seems to be the one offered by the West Coast supporter and it's purely a wait and see to how his vascular system responds with increased workload and stress on his body.
 
The messaging around Elliott continues to be at odds with each other IMO.

First injury update on the Collingwood website containing news on Elliott was on May 13th:



Next update on May 20th:



May 27th update:



Latest update 4th June:



We were initially told it was only a minor vascular issue and was treatable.

Okay we can accept this initial diagnosis might have been wrong but it was only last week it was still being stated he could return anywhere between King's Birthday and round 16.

Fast forward to yesterday and suddenly he'll miss another 6 to 8 weeks with the main reason of conditioning being given.

Alas go back to the first update and Wade specifically states he will be able to maintain his fitness and further updates state he's been doing a modified program.

I highly doubt a player who last played just over a month ago and one who was already a supreme athlete now needs up to a further 8 weeks to gain full match fitness. That makes no sense to a lay person let alone when Wade has specifically stated previously that wouldn't be required.

So what's really going on?

The more plausible explanation seems to be the one offered by the West Coast supporter and it's purely a wait and see to how his vascular system responds with increased workload and stress on his body.
Ah yes. The West Coast supporter. I love his credentials.
 
Ah yes. The West Coast supporter. I love his credentials.

I have found myself confused by the West Coast supporter and his lack of punctuation. I disagree with his diagnosis based upon the available information but we’re all really playing darts blindfolded at the moment.
 
The messaging around Elliott continues to be at odds with each other IMO.

First injury update on the Collingwood website containing news on Elliott was on May 13th:



Next update on May 20th:



May 27th update:



Latest update 4th June:



We were initially told it was only a minor vascular issue and was treatable.

Okay we can accept this initial diagnosis might have been wrong but it was only last week it was still being stated he could return anywhere between King's Birthday and round 16.

Fast forward to yesterday and suddenly he'll miss another 6 to 8 weeks with the main reason of conditioning being given.

Alas go back to the first update and Wade specifically states he will be able to maintain his fitness and further updates state he's been doing a modified program.

I highly doubt a player who last played just over a month ago and one who was already a supreme athlete now needs up to a further 8 weeks to gain full match fitness. That makes no sense to a lay person let alone when Wade has specifically stated previously that wouldn't be required.

So what's really going on?

The more plausible explanation seems to be the one offered by the West Coast supporter and it's purely a wait and see to how his vascular system responds with increased workload and stress on his body.
It may well be that whatever treatment/ medication he is on to prevent a reoccurrence precludes him from playing .
 
The messaging around Elliott continues to be at odds with each other IMO.
I think the key point is that the first update that came out, was before Elliott had seen the vascular specialist to develop a program let alone implement it.

The initial timeline given had Elliott coming back between weeks 13 and 16, now we’ve just finished week 12 and they’re saying that he has not yet fully recovered, albeit the messaging sounds positive.

Long story short, this is a condition the club has not seen a lot of, they implemented a program which is showing improvement but not at the expected rate, so they’ve updated the timeline.
 
Last edited:
Just leaving this here. Still fits better for me than DVT.

https://www.henryford.com/blog/2021/08/jogging-disease

Another possibility along similar lines;

“Clinical signs and symptoms of CECS of the foot remain diverse and lack the consistency of its counter part in the leg. The range of signs and symptoms include swelling, tension, cramps, tightness, paraesthesia, numbness, cyanosis and soft tissue indurations.”

https://bjsm.bmj.com/content/45/2/e1.43
 
Last edited:

(Log in to remove this ad.)

The messaging around Elliott continues to be at odds with each other IMO.

First injury update on the Collingwood website containing news on Elliott was on May 13th:



Next update on May 20th:



May 27th update:



Latest update 4th June:



We were initially told it was only a minor vascular issue and was treatable.

Okay we can accept this initial diagnosis might have been wrong but it was only last week it was still being stated he could return anywhere between King's Birthday and round 16.

Fast forward to yesterday and suddenly he'll miss another 6 to 8 weeks with the main reason of conditioning being given.

Alas go back to the first update and Wade specifically states he will be able to maintain his fitness and further updates state he's been doing a modified program.

I highly doubt a player who last played just over a month ago and one who was already a supreme athlete now needs up to a further 8 weeks to gain full match fitness. That makes no sense to a lay person let alone when Wade has specifically stated previously that wouldn't be required.

So what's really going on?

The more plausible explanation seems to be the one offered by the West Coast supporter and it's purely a wait and see to how his vascular system responds with increased workload and stress on his body.
Sounds like the Murphy situation all over again.
 
Sounds like the Murphy situation all over again.
Murphy had a long history of concussions and we knew he was working his way back from being medically cleared to even attempt to play footy again, and still had to reach a point where he felt comfortable to play, which he never did.

I don't think there was any point in the process where we were not being told the whole story - It was just a situation where we were hoping it went one way and ended up going the other.
 
COLLINGWOOD captain Darcy Moore says Jamie Elliott's health is the main priority as the premiership forward battles a vascular problem that will sideline him for at least another six weeks.

Elliott hasn't featured at AFL level since round eight because of the vascular issue in his foot, which the Magpies say is almost resolved.

https://www.afl.com.au/news/1144990...lity-will-hoskin-elliott-to-face-fitness-test
The 31-year-old is on track to resume outdoor training in the club's rehabilitation group this week, but still faces up to another two months out of the team.

Elliott's ongoing battle comes with ninth-placed Collingwood tackling a huge injury toll ahead of the King's Birthday blockbuster against Melbourne.

"Jamie's dealing with an injury concern at the moment and taking a bit of time to recover," Moore said on Wednesday.

1aJIoqWs.jpg


Jamie Elliott reacts after the final siren of the match between Essendon and Collingwood at the MCG in round seven, 2024. Picture: AFL Photos
"He's still in that recovery phase, so his health is obviously paramount and comes first.

"Then once he's done with that phase he'll look to try and get back out there on the field.


"We just wish him all the best but his health is definitely paramount right now."

Fellow forwards Brody Mihocek (hamstring), Mason Cox (knee/concussion), Joe Richards (foot) and Dan McStay (knee - season) are also out of action, though Will Hoskin-Elliott (hamstring) and young key forward Reef McInnes (concussion) could return against Melbourne.



Collingwood has used regular defenders Jeremy Howe and Billy Frampton to fill holes in attack in recent weeks, and Ash Johnson was recalled for last-round's loss to the Western Bulldogs.

Dual All-Australian defender Moore began his career as a forward but laughed off suggestions he could return to the role as a solution to the Pies' personnel problems.

"We've got plenty of options," Moore said.

"We've tried some guys in different roles across the field over the last few weeks and always with a bit of change there are some issues.
 
Murphy had a long history of concussions and we knew he was working his way back from being medically cleared to even attempt to play footy again, and still had to reach a point where he felt comfortable to play, which he never did.

I don't think there was any point in the process where we were not being told the whole story - It was just a situation where we were hoping it went one way and ended up going the other.
I’m referring to the way in which his return date seems to get pushed further and further out, a la Murphy’s.
I am well aware that they are for different medical reasons.
 
Should build a statue of Jamie at Euroa.
When they toured the cup last year I wrote to the club suggesting that they photograph it with Jamie at this location…….

IMG_8024.jpeg



As a good Euroa recruit I thought there was a synergy about it.
Alas….
 
I’m referring to the way in which his return date seems to get pushed further and further out, a la Murphy’s.
I am well aware that they are for different medical reasons.
You made a silly comparison.
Own it.
 
I’m referring to the way in which his return date seems to get pushed further and further out, a la Murphy’s.
I am well aware that they are for different medical reasons.
I'm explaining to you that the lack of transparency that we're questioning in this case was not present in Murphy's case, so they're not comparable.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Player Watch Jamie Elliott

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top