Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Good lord
They are baffled as to how he got it, not the extremely common injury that is a vascular injury by DVT. You know how many thousands of people get this every day? You think they performing some form of lab experiments on Jamie Elliot or something?
Maybe even more of a fearmonger then Tom Morris by the sounds of it
Good lord
They are baffled as to how he got it, not the extremely common injury that is a vascular injury by DVT. You know how many thousands of people get this every day? You think they performing some form of lab experiments on Jamie Elliot or something?
Maybe even more of a fearmonger then Tom Morris by the sounds of it
Collingwood forward Jamie Elliott will spend some time on a modified training program as he manages a minor vascular issue.
After experiencing foot soreness last week, the concern was initially believed to be back related but further assessment has revealed a treatable vascular issue.
Elliott will see vascular specialists for further prognosis and treatment.
Collingwood Head of High-Performance Jarrod Wade said:
“Disappointing news for Jamie who will spend two to three weeks on a modified training program as he recovers from a vascular issue. In positive news it is not a significant issue, and it is treatable.
“While Jamie recovers and receives treatment, he will be able to train and will continue to keep his fitness.”
Collingwood forward Jamie Elliott will continue to spend some time on a modified training program as he manages a minor vascular issue.
The 31-year-old has been in consultation with vascular specialists and he has seen improvements in his conditioning work.
Elliott is expected to return between Rounds 13-16.
Collingwood forward Jamie Elliott continues to work through a modified training program as he manages a minor vascular issue.
The 31-year-old continues to complete treadmill and bike work away from the group. Elliott is expected to return between Rounds 13 and 16.
Jamie Elliott’s vascular issue is progressing well and is almost resolved. The forward is on a modified training program which includes indoor pool and treadmill work. Elliott is expected to complete outdoor running later this week.
The 31-year-old is expected to return in six to eight weeks.
Ah yes. The West Coast supporter. I love his credentials.The messaging around Elliott continues to be at odds with each other IMO.
First injury update on the Collingwood website containing news on Elliott was on May 13th:
Next update on May 20th:
May 27th update:
Latest update 4th June:
We were initially told it was only a minor vascular issue and was treatable.
Okay we can accept this initial diagnosis might have been wrong but it was only last week it was still being stated he could return anywhere between King's Birthday and round 16.
Fast forward to yesterday and suddenly he'll miss another 6 to 8 weeks with the main reason of conditioning being given.
Alas go back to the first update and Wade specifically states he will be able to maintain his fitness and further updates state he's been doing a modified program.
I highly doubt a player who last played just over a month ago and one who was already a supreme athlete now needs up to a further 8 weeks to gain full match fitness. That makes no sense to a lay person let alone when Wade has specifically stated previously that wouldn't be required.
So what's really going on?
The more plausible explanation seems to be the one offered by the West Coast supporter and it's purely a wait and see to how his vascular system responds with increased workload and stress on his body.
Ah yes. The West Coast supporter. I love his credentials.
It may well be that whatever treatment/ medication he is on to prevent a reoccurrence precludes him from playing .The messaging around Elliott continues to be at odds with each other IMO.
First injury update on the Collingwood website containing news on Elliott was on May 13th:
Next update on May 20th:
May 27th update:
Latest update 4th June:
We were initially told it was only a minor vascular issue and was treatable.
Okay we can accept this initial diagnosis might have been wrong but it was only last week it was still being stated he could return anywhere between King's Birthday and round 16.
Fast forward to yesterday and suddenly he'll miss another 6 to 8 weeks with the main reason of conditioning being given.
Alas go back to the first update and Wade specifically states he will be able to maintain his fitness and further updates state he's been doing a modified program.
I highly doubt a player who last played just over a month ago and one who was already a supreme athlete now needs up to a further 8 weeks to gain full match fitness. That makes no sense to a lay person let alone when Wade has specifically stated previously that wouldn't be required.
So what's really going on?
The more plausible explanation seems to be the one offered by the West Coast supporter and it's purely a wait and see to how his vascular system responds with increased workload and stress on his body.
I think the key point is that the first update that came out, was before Elliott had seen the vascular specialist to develop a program let alone implement it.The messaging around Elliott continues to be at odds with each other IMO.
Think the number 1 credential was repeating but not learning the same lesson so he kept breaking bones?Ah yes. The West Coast supporter. I love his credentials.
not good, wasnt his footDid Wade mention how his leprosy is progressing? Has his foot fallen off yet?
Sounds like the Murphy situation all over again.The messaging around Elliott continues to be at odds with each other IMO.
First injury update on the Collingwood website containing news on Elliott was on May 13th:
Next update on May 20th:
May 27th update:
Latest update 4th June:
We were initially told it was only a minor vascular issue and was treatable.
Okay we can accept this initial diagnosis might have been wrong but it was only last week it was still being stated he could return anywhere between King's Birthday and round 16.
Fast forward to yesterday and suddenly he'll miss another 6 to 8 weeks with the main reason of conditioning being given.
Alas go back to the first update and Wade specifically states he will be able to maintain his fitness and further updates state he's been doing a modified program.
I highly doubt a player who last played just over a month ago and one who was already a supreme athlete now needs up to a further 8 weeks to gain full match fitness. That makes no sense to a lay person let alone when Wade has specifically stated previously that wouldn't be required.
So what's really going on?
The more plausible explanation seems to be the one offered by the West Coast supporter and it's purely a wait and see to how his vascular system responds with increased workload and stress on his body.
No need to bandage prosthetic feetNo bandages or compression stockings.
Surely they still would though, because it's all a big conspiracy isn't it?No need to bandage prosthetic feet
Murphy had a long history of concussions and we knew he was working his way back from being medically cleared to even attempt to play footy again, and still had to reach a point where he felt comfortable to play, which he never did.Sounds like the Murphy situation all over again.
I’m referring to the way in which his return date seems to get pushed further and further out, a la Murphy’s.Murphy had a long history of concussions and we knew he was working his way back from being medically cleared to even attempt to play footy again, and still had to reach a point where he felt comfortable to play, which he never did.
I don't think there was any point in the process where we were not being told the whole story - It was just a situation where we were hoping it went one way and ended up going the other.
I wonder if it's in his right leg? Probably dumb question, but can tattoos cause vascular issues? His left leg is clean as far as tattoos are concerned.No bandages or compression stockings.
You made a silly comparison.I’m referring to the way in which his return date seems to get pushed further and further out, a la Murphy’s.
I am well aware that they are for different medical reasons.
I'm explaining to you that the lack of transparency that we're questioning in this case was not present in Murphy's case, so they're not comparable.I’m referring to the way in which his return date seems to get pushed further and further out, a la Murphy’s.
I am well aware that they are for different medical reasons.