Scandal Joel Smith (Melbourne): Cocaine trafficking accusation

Remove this Banner Ad

Trafficking Accusation:


MFC and AFL Statements:

Melbourne Football Club Media Statement – Joel Smith


The Melbourne Football Club has been advised by the AFL that further Anti-Doping Rule Violations have been asserted against Joel Smith by Sport Integrity Australia.

The Melbourne Football Club is not authorised to make public comment while this is an ongoing matter that is being investigated by Sport Integrity Australia.

It should be noted since the article has been published on the Herald Sun website, Joel’s management has contacted the Club on his behalf to advise that the comments made by the source within the article are not reflective of Joel’s views and the source is not speaking on any authority from Joel.

Joel has made it very clear that he has no issues or concerns with anyone at the Melbourne Football Club.

As the Club has previously stated, we will wait for the investigation to be completed before we update our supporters further.

AFL STATEMENT – JOEL SMITH

The AFL confirms that further Anti-Doping Rule Violations (ADRVs) have been asserted against Joel Smith of the Melbourne Football Club under the Australian Football Anti-Doping Code.

Sport Integrity Australia (SIA) has notified Smith that three ADRVs for “Trafficking or Attempted Trafficking” of Cocaine to third parties are asserted against him.

Under the Code, Trafficking in an anti-doping context is relevantly defined to be “Selling, giving, transporting, sending, delivering or distributing a Prohibited Substance, by an Athlete … to any third party [but] shall not include actions involving Prohibited Substances which are not prohibited in Out-of-Competition Testing unless the circumstances as a whole demonstrate such Prohibited Substances are not intended for genuine and legal therapeutic purposes or are intended to enhance sport performance” (Article 1 of the Code).

Further, SIA has notified Smith that an ADRV for Possession of a Prohibited Substance (Cocaine) on 9 September 2022 is asserted against him.

These ADRVs are in addition to that previously asserted against him (in connection with a sample provided by him after the match between Melbourne and Hawthorn on 20 August 2023 which tested positive to Cocaine and its metabolite, Benzoylecgonine).

Smith will continue to be provisionally suspended pending the finalisation of all of these matters, meaning he is not permitted to be part of Melbourne’s football program, including Melbourne’s pre-season training that is currently underway.

Under the Code, the new asserted ADRVs will be further investigated by SIA and these matters may ultimately be heard by an AFL Anti-Doping Tribunal in the coming months.

Due to the ongoing nature of the anti-doping process, the AFL and SIA are unable to make any further comment at this time.
 
Last edited:

Log in to remove this ad.

Log in to remove this ad.

What the hell has Maynard being a weak grub have to do with this?

Smith Father had fair bit to say about something that didn't concern him.

This is your son mate give us your opinion now you old grub.
 
Van Rooyan should have got 3 weeks, and his stupid decision likely cost Melbourne the premiership.
Kosi should have gotten 4 weeks, but the AFL didn't want to suspend Buddy for the 4 that he deserved the same week.
Check my post history on Goodwin - the bloke is an idiot that should not be eployed in any team sport.

See what not being a nuffie is when I can rationally look at the club I support.

Maynard is a weak grub, hope he gets serious bad injury that ends his career and leaves him with a disability like he has done to Brayshaw.


Likely cost you the premiership? More delusional than May.

Melbourne football club sooks of the century
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

The chip on Eagles supporters shoulders from that period of time is still running strong I see. The way they carry on like the attention wasn't warranted is truly a sight to behold.
Not really.

We had Hawthorn's 'injunction' swept under the rug, Dane Swan's antics ignored by the Vic media, players from the Swans' '12 premiership team supposedly railing lines and not being very discreet about it, as well as a raft of other behaviours by players that, aside from a few articles, were largely ignored.

Yet we still have dropkicks who keep bleating on about WCE's drug issues in the 00's...
 
Not really.

We had Hawthorn's 'injunction' swept under the rug, Dane Swan's antics ignored by the Vic media, players from the Swans' '12 premiership team supposedly railing lines and not being very discreet about it, as well as a raft of other behaviours by players that, aside from a few articles, were largely ignored.

Yet we still have dropkicks who keep bleating on about WCE's drug issues in the 00's...
One of the Eagles players ended up dead, that's a bit worse than other clubs.

Eagles' drug problem was well known and covered up for years. I know a journalist who was told by his editor not to report it or The West Australian newspaper would be blackballed by the club. It only came out because of the "Ben Cousins Biathlon" that couldn't be hidden.

The Perth Persecution Complex really is on show here.
 
If its in the system on game day, then he's pretty cooked. Irrespective of when it was taken
The code was updated on January 1, 2021, whereby “an athlete who has tested positive to a Substance of Abuse’ in-competition (which includes cocaine), the sanction is only three months if the athlete can prove the substance was used out of competition and was unrelated to sporting performance’’.

But if he can prove he didn't use it to improve performance he should only get 3 months instead of 2-4 years? Or am I reading that wrong?
 
One of the Eagles players ended up dead, that's a bit worse than other clubs.

Eagles' drug problem was well known and covered up for years. I know a journalist who was told by his editor not to report it or The West Australian newspaper would be blackballed by the club. It only came out because of the "Ben Cousins Biathlon" that couldn't be hidden.

The Perth Persecution Complex really is on show here.
Way to miss the point. It wasn't about "poor Eagles" it's about the double-standards in regards to reporting during/after the fact when other clubs had the exact same issues.

Mainwaring wasn't from that era, either.

Need Oliver to end up dead before it cops the attention it should? Melbourne have some serious issues.
 
The code was updated on January 1, 2021, whereby “an athlete who has tested positive to a Substance of Abuse’ in-competition (which includes cocaine), the sanction is only three months if the athlete can prove the substance was used out of competition and was unrelated to sporting performance’’.

But if he can prove he didn't use it to improve performance he should only get 3 months instead of 2-4 years? Or am I reading that wrong?
If he can prove that it didn't affect his gameday, then you'd think he had an argument....i reckon it would be a tough one to prove though
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Scandal Joel Smith (Melbourne): Cocaine trafficking accusation

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top