This sentence is all kinds of awesome, absolute ****ing gold as always mate
-
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
USA Kamala Harris the 47th President of the United States - Hopefully.
- Thread starter Not Important
- Start date
- Tagged users None
What she actually said was half of his supporters were deplorables, and she was right. Not helpful electorally of course but it was spot on.
She made the comment after;
Trump called her a monster, unbalanced, unstable and unhinged
Said a Clinton presidency would lead to “the destruction of this country from within”
Got his rallies chanting "lock her up"
Rally goers heard shouting "traitor" and "kill her"
One of the mildest responses you could possibly imagine. And it still sends blokes like you into a tizzy to this very day 8 years later
Haha classic, you should run a goalpost moving company.
No mate, no one is saying that. You made the claim, you first.
Vote ID requirements famously being the only voter surpression method
You're so dishonest, its actually unreal.
Its just a deflection by Stokey. He brought it up to to avoid talking about something particularly stupid he'd said.
So what else is new
carltonchelsea
Premiership Player
- Sep 4, 2021
- 3,295
- 5,993
- AFL Club
- Carlton
exactly, a variation on the voter roll shenanigans that GA did to purge many of the same demographic
Maggie5
Moderator
- Moderator
- #5,084
Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Trump will appear at two separate town halls in front of a Spanish-speaking audience next month, Univision announced Tuesday.
Why it matters: One of the largest U.S. Spanish-language broadcasters is putting the presidential candidates before a key voting bloc, Hispanic voters, to face questions on the economy, jobs, health care, immigration and foreign policy.
This will be huge for her if she can reach through to them.
Moderator seems to have a good reputation, should be interesting.
Why it matters: One of the largest U.S. Spanish-language broadcasters is putting the presidential candidates before a key voting bloc, Hispanic voters, to face questions on the economy, jobs, health care, immigration and foreign policy.
- "There are more than 36 million Hispanics eligible to vote in the U.S., making them the largest minority in the country, with the power to influence the outcome of the race for the White House and the future of the nation," Noticias Univision president Daniel Coronell said in a statement.
- Undecided Hispanic voters will directly ask questions to each candidate, the broadcaster said.
- "The events will put an electorate that represents close to 15% of the voting bloc front and center, creating a forum exclusively for Latinos," per Univision.
This will be huge for her if she can reach through to them.
Moderator seems to have a good reputation, should be interesting.
That post is about as shameful as your lousy Teams GF performance , lift you game champ
This happens next week.
Harris is in Nevada, a swing state.
Trump's has been postponed due to the Democrats sending a hurricane to Florida. No idea why he's doing a town hall in Florida and not in a swing state anyway.
Please don't put me in the awkward position of not being able to wholeheartedly agree with this post.That post is about as shameful as your lousy Teams GF performance , lift you game champ
They selectively ignored other media and town hall appearances to different demographics as well (in the very post they referenced). Which of course is no surprise with S4L.
Never, why? If a political party polices are such that they cannot win fairly, in a properly functioning democracy said party changes its polices or is replaced with another party. Political parties after all should reflect the views and wishes of the voting population.
Once the Democrats where the party for racist southern whites & the Republicans could not win a southern state. Both parties altered their polices in a search for more votes, until the positions are reversed.
The question than arises as to why the Republican party does not alter their polices again to obtain a wider base instead of doubling down on pandering to the basest desires of the worst of their base and relying on various forms of cheating (such as gerrymandering and disenfranchising voters).
It is my belief that the problem is that both major parties are so beholden to monied interests that they cannot afford to alter their polices. The parties therefore do not reflect the views and wishes of the voting population but the interests of opposing wealthy elites.
Last edited:
So he can rush in after milton hits and say he is saving florida and blame fema etc because havent cleared the crap from wife no 3
- Dec 20, 2021
- 6,805
- 18,366
- AFL Club
- Geelong
- Other Teams
- Arsenal
Think it's obvious why Trump didnt do 60 minutes now.. CBS just cant be trusted to be impartial.
www.foxnews.com
Trump's interview would have been edited to be something like this.
CBS '60 Minutes' airs two different answers from VP Harris to the same question
CBS edited its "60 Minutes" interview with Vice President Kamala Harris, showing different answers to the same question on "Face the Nation" and "60 Minutes."
Trump's interview would have been edited to be something like this.
You mean the CBS that had aired the "word salad" part already? That was widely publicised already.Think it's obvious why Trump didnt do 60 minutes now.. CBS just cant be trusted to be impartial.
CBS '60 Minutes' airs two different answers from VP Harris to the same question
CBS edited its "60 Minutes" interview with Vice President Kamala Harris, showing different answers to the same question on "Face the Nation" and "60 Minutes."
Trump's interview would have been edited to be something like this.
While you're here, how exactly does switching from electoral college to popular vote "end Democracy"?
- Dec 20, 2021
- 6,805
- 18,366
- AFL Club
- Geelong
- Other Teams
- Arsenal
How does it prevent them from voting?
Why the two answers to the same question in the first place¿ In an unscripted interview doesn't that come across as odd
Also I love the argument that if Trump gets in he will end democracy but you are all for the system that will allow one party to rule forever.
As usual it's you trying to walk both sides of the sterrt
- Aug 20, 2010
- 16,753
- 22,179
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
Think it's obvious why Trump didnt do 60 minutes now.. CBS just cant be trusted to be impartial.
CBS '60 Minutes' airs two different answers from VP Harris to the same question
CBS edited its "60 Minutes" interview with Vice President Kamala Harris, showing different answers to the same question on "Face the Nation" and "60 Minutes."
Trump's interview would have been edited to be something like this.
It is quite obvious why. He’s a total coward.
May I ask why you worship such a weak man?
- Aug 20, 2010
- 16,753
- 22,179
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
Seems the Trumpets have already forgotten Trump’s disastrous 2020 60 minute interview that he walked out on after being slightly pressed on an answer. What a baby.
And wants an apology for a non existent comment
No. You know this is untrue. Let's not do the thing where you pretend not to understand. It should be beneath you, as someone who proclaims to have moral standards.
Trump (and other Republicans) want to put into action a system where he/they can ignore the will of the voters and be President (among other offices) without winning an election.
If presidential elections were by popular vote, Republicans are entirely allowed to win them, by receiving more votes nationwide, which is fitting for a nationwide office. There is nothing stopping them, outside of comparative popularity with voters.
What you would be concerned with is that Republican Presidential candidates would actually have to better represent their entire constituency. This may not bode well for the agendas of the more extreme ideologues and those who simp most for the very wealthy and powerful.
But in any case, since Republicans would have the same opportunity as Democrats to win a single nationwide vote for a single nationwide office, I repeat the question, how would this "end Democracy"?
Or are we arguing for equality of outcome here (both sides have to get a turn regardless of vote share), instead of equality of opportunity?
Last edited:
The GOP have absolutely zero interest in the working class. The working class are nothing more than a capital input that the GOP would replace with hamsters if they could.
You might be right that the Dems are flawed - and liberalism is certainly flawed - but Trump and the GOP are not the answer.
Just like Trump pretends to be a Christian to harvest votes, he also pretends to represent the working class to harvest up votes. That is Trumps entire electoral strategy - harvest votes in a handful of critical states.
But the reality is Trump has a history of not paying his bills. Which means Trump has a history of not paying workers.
Trump is the ultimate charlatan.
Just watched the Kamala 60 minutes interview, it is frightening that this person could end up leading the free world? I'd rather vote for "Mayor Pufnstuff" than Kamala Harris, she hasn't got any answers to anything and just tosses up any old rubbish and hopes the interviewer is dumber than she is? It's mind boggling she's gotten this far. How can any sane person think she will be good for America?
Similar threads
