- Jul 23, 2010
- 698
- 683
- AFL Club
- West Coast
There are 50 players per page
Leagues Keeper Fantasy - Brand new keeper league - EXPRESSIONS OF INTEREST
- Thread starter Zim^zuM
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Jul 23, 2010
- 698
- 683
- AFL Club
- West Coast
I'd vote no personally.
I vote yes but not overly fussed.
- Sep 4, 2005
- 7,057
- 3,708
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
- Other Teams
- Newcastle Jets
- Thread starter
- #229
Not sure. I'm torn on the idea because we do both
- Sep 8, 2009
- 5,522
- 3,441
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Albury Bandits, Orlando Magic
Yep, I've always hated scoring percentage personally.
I like the idea of one percenters in there.
- Jul 23, 2010
- 698
- 683
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Could just scrap it as we currently have up to 14 points which could lead to more draws?
2 for score
1 for the other 12 categories
Plus that is a lot of categories.
2 for score
1 for the other 12 categories
Plus that is a lot of categories.
Scrap accuracy I agree
I like captains
I also like FAAB and IR lists but ok if that's too much
I like captains
I also like FAAB and IR lists but ok if that's too much
- Sep 8, 2009
- 5,522
- 3,441
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Albury Bandits, Orlando Magic
Nothing wrong with having draws IMO. All part of the game.
Arent we playing with like 44 player lists? Why would we need IR? Im with you on FAAB tho
Just scrap accuracy as i think we want odd number of cats and currently we have a lot of cats
- Sep 4, 2005
- 7,057
- 3,708
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
- Other Teams
- Newcastle Jets
- Thread starter
- #236
I put 44
Ye so no need for IR spots with 22 reserves.
- Sep 26, 2004
- 48,049
- 65,134
- AFL Club
- Carlton
- Moderator
- #238
Thanks Zim^zuM for sending invites. Are you taking on commissioner duties?
I agree with previous posts re: the scoring settings. I think we've toggled with them too much, the onsite rankings are wild.
I'm very much a traditionalist with scoring options and love being able to follow along as games transpire. That's why I'm pro AFL Fantasy rather than SuperCoach which is much more difficult to follow, and quite frankly a bit of a wank.
Whilst I am ok changing the scoring slightly, I think that we've gone way too far and would be supportive of a rethink.
Captains are a definite no for me.
I agree with previous posts re: the scoring settings. I think we've toggled with them too much, the onsite rankings are wild.
I'm very much a traditionalist with scoring options and love being able to follow along as games transpire. That's why I'm pro AFL Fantasy rather than SuperCoach which is much more difficult to follow, and quite frankly a bit of a wank.
Whilst I am ok changing the scoring slightly, I think that we've gone way too far and would be supportive of a rethink.
Captains are a definite no for me.
Similar threads
