Kurt Tippett to the Swans? **UPDATE: Tippett requests trade to Sydney***

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
GWS have first PSD pick. If Skirt doesn't like it, then he can just sit out football for the entire year on no money :)

Things are coming up Milhouse for the might crows :)


But kurt will go into the national draft not the PSD
 
Stephen Milne at the Saints didn't make top 10 and kicks 50+ goals as a small forward. There is one objective indicator that rules them all... and that's the pay packet. it's the same in any job in any industry the world over.

It's fine for you to say overhyped, not that good, injury cloud, best and fairest means everything... but only if you want to put a dollar number that reflects all these words. If that dollar number is $3,600,000+ over 4 years... then your argument starts to ya know kinda stink.

Am I wrong?

Am I?

Can you point out the part where I said he's worth $3,600,000 over 4 years? He's not. Sydney shouldn't pay him that, and you shouldn't have overpaid him over the past few years either.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Rohan, Parker and 22 would be about right.

Broken leg, not best 22 and an average first rounder.

Either that or we will just deal with the superior club from down the road :)

Oh HAI gets!

Long time no see.

Sailing close to the wind there sunshine.
Past history gets! you a pass this time, repeat and you will gets! fooked. ;)
 
You have a great knack for deluding yourself into believing Adelaide are in the box seat regardless of how the situation changes.

Weren't you just saying that Tippett only cares about $ ? Surely he wouldn't go to a QLD club that can't afford to pay him what Sydney or GWS can when he can just slip through to the highest bidder.
Not deluded mate. Just trying to keep optimistic. As is our board.
 
Can you point out the part where I said he's worth $3,600,000 over 4 years? He's not. Sydney shouldn't pay him that, and you shouldn't have overpaid him over the past few years either.

Sydney are paying him that... it's not really in dispute... if it is it's like a fist full of ones give or take. What we were paying him is irrelevant. My only point is that a players trade value is a combination of his salary x the number of years of life he has left. In this case you are offering a 4 year contract which is significant in length.

In respect to the AFC's attitude towards Kurt since the defection... all I will say is that post is a very convenient perspective and a good way to swallow the fact you're importing a million dollar baby into the bloods culture, placing him on a pedestal at the expense of those that built the place.
 
We must have the least moderated board on bigfooty. This thread would be 50 pages shorter if a couple of people had been banned
 
Sydney are paying him that... it's not really in dispute... if it is it's like a fist full of ones give or take. What we were paying him is irrelevant. My only point is that a players trade value is a combination of his salary x the number of years of life he has left. In this case you are offering a 4 year contract which is significant in length.

In respect to the AFC's attitude towards Kurt since the defection... all I will say is that post is a very convenient perspective and a good way to swallow the fact you're importing a million dollar baby into the bloods culture, placing him on a pedestal at the expense of those that built the place.

I was stating what I believe he is worth, and what GWS should give up for him. I'm not sure what that has to do with a proposed contract between Kurt and Sydney.

Like the majority of posters on here, I don't really want Kurt at our club. Not at the expense of unsettling the team balance. I'm quite happy for GWS to snap him up, but if they do I don't think you'll find they'll be parting with pick 3. I would have thought pick 13 would be adequate in this situation.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

In respect to the AFC's attitude towards Kurt since the defection... all I will say is that post is a very convenient perspective and a good way to swallow the fact you're importing a million dollar baby into the bloods culture, placing him on a pedestal at the expense of those that built the place.

Oh come on, really? Convenient perspective?

Tippett played out his contract. Defection? What a loaded term, and maybe shows a little bias of your own? He wanted to get out of Adelaide. That's it. It's not a defection, if you are unhappy, you move on. It's true of relationships, it's true of jobs, it's true of life in general. Even the big money offered by Adelaide wasn't enough to make him happy there. In your eyes he should ahve stayed, and when he chose not to he's some kind of traitor? Defection... really?

Most clubs, when a player wants out, they do what they can to help that player get to the club of his choice. Adelaide seemed fine with that when it was Bris or GC. But suddenly when it was Sydney, they threw their toys out of the cot, and turned on him. As did their fans.

And don't worry about the culture at Sydney. He'll earn his spot with hard work, and buy-in, or he can walk right out again.
 
We must have the least moderated board on bigfooty. This thread would be 50 pages shorter if a couple of people had been banned

Normally I don't mind that we're a little more lax in this area. It makes for interesting discussions occasionally but in this instance it's getting pretty old. Same old crap for 150 pages.

"We don't want him if we have to rip our team apart to do it"
"Well you have to otherwise he'll go to Brisbane Gold Coast GWS"
"Pick 22 and Jesse White"
"Rohan/Parker and pick 22"
"No"
"fu, I'm going to go have sexual relations with my sister"
 
Imagine if we do rip them blind and get him in the PSD we'l never get rid of them. The tippets gone thread will reach 2,000,000 pages.
Its almost like that stray dog you fed once and the xxxx kept coming back.
 
I was stating what I believe he is worth, and what GWS should give up for him. I'm not sure what that has to do with a proposed contract between Kurt and Sydney.

Like the majority of posters on here, I don't really want Kurt at our club. Not at the expense of unsettling the team balance. I'm quite happy for GWS to snap him up, but if they do I don't think you'll find they'll be parting with pick 3. I would have thought pick 13 would be adequate in this situation.
pick 3 is just absurd. Come on crows be a little realistic.
 
I think GWS might be just throwing there hat in the ring to join trade. It doesnt automatically mean we are out, as I 'predicted' earlier it could still end up a three or four way trade.
 
I was stating what I believe he is worth, and what GWS should give up for him. I'm not sure what that has to do with a proposed contract between Kurt and Sydney.

Like the majority of posters on here, I don't really want Kurt at our club. Not at the expense of unsettling the team balance. I'm quite happy for GWS to snap him up, but if they do I don't think you'll find they'll be parting with pick 3. I would have thought pick 13 would be adequate in this situation.
The concern here is that not many of the Adelaide fans understand how the draft works. They are all jumping about because GWS their savior has arrived. And they will magically receive pick 3. They are even working out who they are going to get with it.

If Tippett stands his ground, and why wouldn't he the way the have spoken of him in the last week. Then it's Sydney or the PSD. So if Tippett continues to say no they can't receive a pick from GWS. The only way this can change is it Tippett changes his mind.

Can anyone work out why he would do that whilst Adelaide are slanging off at him on the paper. A major mistake in there negotiation process.

Look GWS coming in will force us to up our offer. But pick 3 it will not be.

The other thing that they are saying is we need to trade with GWS. FFS why would GWS do a deal with us to give us picks that helps us get Tippett when they are supposedly after him. Someone forgot to think that one through.

SOS has played them and I think it will mean that they eventually get him, but that will be through the PSD.

And someone need to tell the crows that PSD = zero picks.
 
If GWS really want him they will get him simple as that with pick 12, 13 or the PSD. No way we can compete with that.

But I don't think they really want him.
 
Normally I don't mind that we're a little more lax in this area. It makes for interesting discussions occasionally but in this instance it's getting pretty old. Same old crap for 150 pages.

"We don't want him if we have to rip our team apart to do it"
"Well you have to otherwise he'll go to Brisbane Gold Coast GWS"
"Pick 22 and Jesse White"
"Rohan/Parker and pick 22"
"No"
"fu, I'm going to go have sexual relations with my sister"
Nice to see the maturity levels are at a high level over here....
 
The concern here is that not many of the Adelaide fans understand how the draft works. They are all jumping about because GWS their savior has arrived. And they will magically receive pick 3. They are even working out who they are going to get with it.

False... I'd say most are jumping about because they now realise there is a real possibility that one way or the the other he could be at GWS next year. Even if it's via the PSD. Compared to what was offered before now this is a big win.

If it's pick 3, the PSD or anything in between... it's miles better than him going to Sydney for pick 22 and god knows what else.
 
The other thing that they are saying is we need to trade with GWS. FFS why would GWS do a deal with us to give us picks that helps us get Tippett when they are supposedly after him. Someone forgot to think that one through.

Tom Mitchell says hi!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top