Kurt Tippett

Remove this Banner Ad

NewMelbournian said:
Of course he is tradeable. Some teams will want him. I don't know if Sydney will be big enough to admit they screwed up going for him. If they are rational they will make Reid their 2nd KPF, trade Tippett for whatever they can get, and then use his money to get some defenders.
Click to expand...

No he's not we're on a trading ban. We're not Adelaide we aren't going for nothing.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Sydney have basically paid 3 Million

For 40 games 94 goals
10ppg
1.8 tackles pg
8HO per game


At this stage... For income vs output
He's disappointing

Top echelon money... Mid range or less performance
 
Big Mart said:
Sydney have basically paid 3 Million

For 40 games 94 goals
10ppg
1.8 tackles pg
8HO per game


At this stage... For income vs output
He's disappointing

Top echelon money... Mid range or less performance
Click to expand...

I love how his contract climbs every time some one posts at this rate buddy will be on 5 million PA before he retires.
 
Tippett is robbing the Swans, no doubt, but he is not the only one. Pretty sure every club would have players getting paid more then they ever deserved, but then again when you gotta pay a minimum 95% most clubs have no choice.
Though $875,000 or $16,827 a week before tax is alot to pay for a player who most weeks is nothing more then a decoy.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Big Mart said:
Sydney have basically paid 3 Million

For 40 games 94 goals
10ppg
1.8 tackles pg
8HO per game


At this stage... For income vs output
He's disappointing

Top echelon money... Mid range or less performance
Click to expand...

2.5 goals a game plus a second ruck?

How is that mid range? Find me 10 other rucks with better numbers.

The ignorance from people who claim to be footy lovers is astounding.
 
Hardhat11 said:
The problem with Tippett is physical

He doesn't have fast twitch muscle fibres ....yup he can jump but not quickly

I have watched this guy and he appears to have the tools but physically he's not the athlete everyone makes him out to be.

Personally I would make him a ruckman who drifts forward
Click to expand...

How do you jump fast vs jump slow?

Wouldn't that be jump high or not as high then?
 
Eshay187 said:
2.5 goals a game plus a second ruck?

How is that mid range? Find me 10 other rucks with better numbers.

The ignorance from people who claim to be footy lovers is astounding.
Click to expand...
I bet I could find other players on his pay packet with better numbers.

As a second ruckmen, he is reasonable. A player on his wage should be elite

Wasn't that the point of the post.

The knowledge of some people who make smart arse replies amuses me
 
Hawthorn should nab him.

It's absolutely fair how a top team should be able to recruit guns from lower clubs. Just like Sydney do...
Add to
Burgoyne, Lake, Frawley, Hale, McEvoy, Gibson, Gunston.

Perhaps Dangerfield too?

They are making the most of a system... Good on them. It's great for footy.
 
Big Mart said:
I bet I could find other players on his pay packet with better numbers.

As a second ruckmen, he is reasonable. A player on his wage should be elite

Wasn't that the point of the post.

The knowledge of some people who make smart arse replies amuses me
Click to expand...


Thats a fair point

But you didnt find one player yet, come back when you do
 
A player on that pay packet?

Not many would be...

Nick Riewoldt before he took a pay cut. I won't compare the output difference, it would be embarrassing.

I think BJ Goddard is around the 800k mark... He's won a b&f and is 3 times the player.

Fact is
Tippett would be in the top ten paid players in the comp

Not in the top 50 players.

He's not even in the top 5 at Sydney

Franklin, Parker, Hannebury, Kennedy, Jack.
Actually, is he better on output than
Richards, Rampe, Mcviegh, Cunningham, Smith... I could go on..
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Kurt Tippett

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top