List of WELCHERS on Bigfooty

[William Wonka]

The initial bet that was made was Sydney getting a 30 point head start, which is a "5 goal line", which was Bayer's proposed bet. A simple mix up in the team names once the bet had already been settled is void and irrelevant. If you wanted a 5 goal line, you should've mentioned it as a 5 goal line from 60 points, or just simplified it to "if the Swans win by more than 30" or something. Just cop it Bayer mate, don't be a welcher like the other Hawthorn flogs. Set an example.

Line bets can be + or - you idiot, although it was obvious by context of your initial boast what @Bayer s meaning was.

Luckily it was clarified:
Just after you made the bet.

After you lost the bet


That's THREE TIMES you acknowledged the bet was 'Hawthorn gets a 30 point head start'.

This is boring me now.

Enjoy your badge you welching flog.

 

[BloodRet]

Line bets can be + or - you idiot, although it was obvious by context of your initial boast what @Bayer s meaning was.

Luckily it was clarified:
Just after you made the bet.
View attachment 497281
After you lost the bet
View attachment 497283

That's THREE TIMES you acknowledged the bet was 'Hawthorn gets a 30 point head start'.

This is boring me now.

Enjoy your badge you welching flog.

Yeah no shit sherlock, and the bet we agreed on was Sydney +30. Do you know how to ****ing count or are you just a straight up moron? That post you keep quoting is irrelevant as it is not part of the bet. Ring up Sportsbet or another bookie now and ask them what a line is. We're a welchy team at Hawthorn, we're the welchy welchy Hawks!

 

[BloodRet]

We welch on bets and we think they win!

 

[BloodRet]

Ignoring the facts with a grin at Hawthorn!

 

[William Wonka]

Look at this post editing campaigner BloodRet

BEFORE.



AFTER.



Badge the campaigner for cheating if nothing else!

 

[BloodRet]

Now quote Bayer's original bet. You know I had not slept at that point and was about 60 standards deep? That post is meaningless.

 

[BloodRet]

Anyway this is going around in circles. I'm happy for the mods to decide, or better yet a poll. Otherwise there's only one welcher here, and it ain't me!

 

[Bayer_]

Now quote Bayer's original bet. You know I had not slept at that point and was about 60 standards deep? That post is meaningless.

Your OP implied you'd be comfortable with a line of 60. I generously offered you 30. You lost. Pay up or be badged.

 

[BloodRet]

Lines start from zero. You generously offered a 30 point line. Hawthorn fell 39 points short of your bet.

 

[crazywildhorse]

As your mum said, The longer you drag this out, the worse it will be for your long term reputation. Which is a good thing

 

[Laphroaig]

Why don't we have both?

 

[Geelong Dynasty]

Your OP implied you'd be comfortable with a line of 60. I generously offered you 30. You lost. Pay up or be badged.

He was confident the Swans would flog you by 10 goals. However without any prior discussion between you two, you piped up and offered him a bet, you said I’ll even be generous and give you a 5 goal line.
That was accepted without any other engagement in discussion.
I read it and knew it meant Sydney had a 5 goal start in the bet, I was surprised you’d make such a bet.

Not accepting you lost the bet is an indictment on your credibility ans character, aka you’re a welching flogbag

 

[Bayer_]

Why don't we have both?

I do have a feeling it's going to end like this:

 

[Geelong Dynasty]

A key word in your bet is you claiming to be generous. Being generous would imply you are offering better conditions than asked for (ergo, better than a 10 goal headstart) however you are now claiming you were offering worse conditions than initially mentioned.

 

[Laphroaig]

I do have a feeling it's going to end like this:

It's the wisdom of Solomon.......

 

[NorthernLights]

 

[frggr]

As your mum said, The longer you drag this out, the worse it will be for your long term reputation. Which is a good thing

Story of Stringer's career

 

[Geelong Dynasty]

The word Generous is the smoking gun in this dispute, the second shooter, the bloodied glove.

It’s a no brainer.

 

[Geelong Dynasty]

 

[Geelong Dynasty]

A key word in your bet is you claiming to be generous. Being generous would imply you are offering better conditions than asked for (ergo, better than a 10 goal headstart) however you are now claiming you were offering worse conditions than initially mentioned.

Bayer_ you are called upon to present your rebuttal.

 

[Two Eyes]

Just give both of them badges for not organising a clear win/loss bet instead of some stupid line bet that can be argued about.

The wisdom of Flogomon!

 

[William Wonka]

View attachment 497331

Hey NL check out my post #1231 where the Bloodwelch blatantly edits his post from
"Give Hawthorn a 30 point headstart"
to
"Give Sydney a 30 point headstart".

Can you shed any light on if the powers that be have recently displayed easygoing attitudes towards cheating?

 

[NorthernLights]

Hey NL check out my post #1231 where the Bloodwelch blatantly edits his post from
"Give Hawthorn a 30 point headstart"
to
"Give Sydney a 30 point headstart".

Can you shed any light on if the powers that be have recently displayed easygoing attitudes towards cheating?

Sorry friend I’m just here for the lulz

 

[Bayer_]

Now quote Bayer's original bet. You know I had not slept at that point and was about 60 standards deep? That post is meaningless.

I didn't edit my post d\h.

 

[BloodRet]

I didn't edit my post d\h.

All I changed was Hawthorn to Sydney as I mixed myself up in that post (which was after the bet had already been established so I don't know why WillySucker keeps bringing it up). Now all you need to change is your av and sig!