
- Banned
- #101
BL is absolutely right, Young was the turnover king. Both BL and I wish Young well with the Blues.Young had plenty of games at half back for us. Some were good many were average and never any good at defend big opponents
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Carlton - 7:30PM Thu
Squiggle tips Blues at 76% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 1
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
BL is absolutely right, Young was the turnover king. Both BL and I wish Young well with the Blues.Young had plenty of games at half back for us. Some were good many were average and never any good at defend big opponents
You might be interested to see what the Carlton board think of him - though I know the answer is they don't know anything about their own players like we doBL is absolutely right, Young was the turnover king. Both BL and I wish Young well with the Blues.
Thanks, F32, I really hope that Young is better at the 'Blues than with us.You might be interested to see what the Carlton board think of him - though I know the answer is they don't know anything about their own players like we do
Senior - 33. Lewis Young
www.bigfooty.com
Well it seems pretty obvious to me that he is already.Thanks, F32, I really hope that Young is better at the 'Blues than with us.
No current season stats available
Well it seems pretty obvious to me that he is already.
I don't really agree with the view that he was given the chance to settle into one position. Even if that was true, it is unfortunate that the club were unable to get the best out of a player that showed quite a bit of promise in a position that needs strengthening in our side. Not sure whether there is an element of resentment for players that leave that comes into it when we evaluate them.
I to expect him to win another 2 with this list.There is a lot opinions here that want their cake and eat it at the same time. They agree Bevo is our greatest coach and his record of a flag and grand final with making the finals in six of eight seasons is a fine record. Yet a lot are putting him on notice, if he wins the last last season this talk would not even being raised.
Kane Cornes is absolute flog and shock jock and Bevo whacked him over his attack on Treloar last season. Yes Bevo is an eccentric a lot of good coaches are and he will never win the battle with the press going to far to protect his players and team.
However the talk of Bevo not being the coach to take us forward is crazy and he will be a 2 times flag coach in the next few years.
No current season stats available
Are you sure Bains wasn't just rationalising a disappointing H&A season? If he honestly isn't fussed whether we make the four then we have the wrong bloke in the job!The radio/audio clip of Baines that someone posted in the Media thread. Baines didn’t seemed too fazed by ladder positions. Mentioned the club has bought in to Bevo’s theory that if a club can peak at finals time, it’s not a massive issue where the end of season ladder position falls, as long as we’re in finals.
Suggests the club isn’t overly concerned with lack of top 4 finishes. Makes sense considering a premiership is the same regardless where you finish at the end of H&A games.
I’m tipping we’ll strengthen our list and coaching group in the off season, we’ll play finals next season, and Bevo will get an extension. If he wants one.
It’s a good result considering the quality of coach he is, and the fact it’s incredibly difficult to find a coach that can take teams to GF’s and win Premierships. Something important that plenty in here forget.
Our fwd line will be the strongest it’s been in recent memory in the next few years. Our defence will be stronger if rumours are true, plus we still have the best midfield in the comp. The next few years will see our list in its strongest position in the Bevo era. I’d be spewing if we ended up wasting those years riding the s**t coaches merry go round with Rutten and Cameron types just because the club decides that top 4 finishes every year is the only pass mark.
Are you sure Bains wasn't just rationalising a disappointing H&A season? If he honestly isn't fussed whether we make the four then we have the wrong bloke in the job!
There's a reason why top four is so critical. In 27 seasons of the top 8 playing finals, no side other than us in 2016 has won a flag without having earned the double-chance. Not even Adelaide who finished fifth in 1998. Under a different finals system they lost their first final before winning three straight. These days you must finish top four to earn the double-chance.
I haven't heard anybody suggest that finishing top 4 every single year should be the club's pass mark. However if our list is as good as you suggest then something like 2 of the next 4 would be a reasonable expectation.
Finally got around to answering your question CB! (see above)The under/overachieving is the result of what you are saying. A mediocre side or line that overachieves can probably be considered well coached. The opposite can be said for a strong side/line that underachieves.
I think what a few of our supporters are suggesting is that our list across the last 8 years has been the strongest it’s ever been, and that they believe because of that it has underachieved in that time (been poorly coached). But, highlighting the pretty mediocre key backs we’ve had (as a whole) I don’t think it’s accurate at all.
What are your thoughts DW? Do you think we should’ve made more Top 4’s, GF’s and won more premierships, or do you think we’ve done pretty well considering the list make up we’ve had?
Ah you've mis-quoted me, CB! I said "I haven't heard anybody suggest that finishing top 4 every single year ...".In comparison to the expectations from supporters in Big Footy, his comments would be taken that finishing Top 4 wasn’t the be all and end all. I certainly took from it that the club is more than happy having Beveridge at the helm and that finals, GF’s and Premiership tilts amongst 8 years is considered a good result.
You haven’t heard anyone using top 4 as a pass mark with our apparent worlds greatest list? I find that hard to believe DW. There’s a few recent posters that hold that view.
...
Finally got around to answering your question CB! (see above)
Yes I think a couple of top 4s in the period 2017-2022 would be a reasonable expectation. Usually that means 16 or more wins. Or 15 wins and a strong percentage in most years (we finished 7th with 15 wins in 2016 but that was a very unusual ladder).
We've had 11, 8, 12, 15 & 13 wins over those years, plus 10 wins from 17 games in 2020 which would be 13 wins if pro-rated to a 22 round season. We were unlucky to miss out in 2021 with 15 wins and a percentage of 132.8 so I'd be inclined to be lenient there, especially as we got revenge by beating Brisbane by a point in the SF.
More flags? More GFs? No, that's probably setting the bar too high. They are incredibly hard to win and you do need a fair bit of luck with injuries, umpiring decisions (ask Hardwick!), etc. Getting us to two GFs in 7 years is highly commendable and must be acknowledged but at the same time we shouldn't ignore what seem to be some missed opportunities in between.
Should having a somewhat deficient backline be taken into account? Hmmmm ... debatable. It was bad luck losing Adams but under Bevo's watch (and I'd suggest largely due to Bevo) we've also lost Roughead and Young who have performed well as tall defenders at other clubs. It was also Bevo's initiative to make Naughton a forward. I know that can be debated endlessly because he's done very well in that role but my point is that Bevo did have opportunities to forge a stronger backline.
Bomber Thompson had won two finals in his first 7 years (didn't make finals more often than not). With one of the most talented lists in history (15+ AA standard players under him).In all honesty we haven’t build a gameplan /system that can stand up to a full, consistent home & away season under Bev, I don’t think that’s going to change after 8 years - would there be many examples of coaches who have turned results around after 8 years?
Ah you've mis-quoted me, CB! I said "I haven't heard anybody suggest that finishing top 4 every single year ...".
Not even Clarko could achieve that with his great Hawthorn list.
After their surprise flag in 2008 they finished 9th then 7th before making top 4 five years in a row (with three flags of course).
Yes, there might be some here who expect top four to be achieved every single year for the duration of Bont's career but I think realistically even they would settle for a top four finish 5 years out of 10. That would be brilliant.
OK, but I thought the debate was all about how he'd done AFTER the 2016 flag. Nobody has argued that he didn't do extremely well in 2015-16.I think you need to include 15 and 16 when highlighting our win/loss record.
...
Fair call, good comparisons that slipped my mind. Definitely possible, just seems unlikely for the most partBomber Thompson had won two finals in his first 7 years (didn't make finals more often than not). With one of the most talented lists in history (15+ AA standard players under him).
Hardwick didn't win a final in his first seven years (0/3). With Dusty, Cotchin, Reiwoldt and Rance in the their prime for a fair chunk of it.
Then it suddenly seemed to all 'click' for both.
Seven completed seasons in, Bevo is two grand finals, a flag and 6-7 finals wins ahead of the both of them.
Bomber turned out to have his demons, but Hardwick is a reasonable comparison of someone who became a 'dynasty' level coach who didn't finish top 4 once in his first 7 seasons.
If we fail this finals series, other than that one top 4 finish, Bevo's still equal or ahead of him on pretty much every other stat after 8 completed seasons.
Bomber Thompson had won two finals in his first 7 years (didn't make finals more often than not). With one of the most talented lists in history (15+ AA standard players under him).
Hardwick didn't win a final in his first seven years (0/3). With Dusty, Cotchin, Reiwoldt and Rance in the their prime for a fair chunk of it.
Then it suddenly seemed to all 'click' for both.
Seven completed seasons in, Bevo is two grand finals, a flag and 6-7 finals wins ahead of the both of them.
Bomber turned out to have his demons, but Hardwick is a reasonable comparison of a 'dynasty' level coach.
If we fail this finals series, Bevo's still equal or ahead of him on every stat after 8 completed seasons.
OK, but I thought the debate was all about how he'd done AFTER the 2016 flag. Nobody has argued that he didn't do extremely well in 2015-16.
In October 2016 he had the coaching job for life as far as anyone here was concerned. Most of the discussion has been about the mystifying (to most of us) missed opportunities after that, especially the dip that you point out from 2017-2019. Maybe even 2020 as well.
The 2022 H&A season was a disappointment to most of us here too. But let's see how that pans out. He will be largely vindicated if he can take us to at least a PF in the weeks ahead.
Have to disagree with you on this. He was given plenty of backline games and pretty much they followed the same trend each time a couple good followed by a number of atrocious ones where he appeared spaced out ( check the GC game at Marvel last year which followed a good first up the week before against Bris, he really appeared not to be concentrating at all). I believe the move into ruck and other pos was a challenge to keep him in the game and concentratingWell it seems pretty obvious to me that he is already.
I don't really agree with the view that he was given the chance to settle into one position. Even if that was true, it is unfortunate that the club were unable to get the best out of a player that showed quite a bit of promise in a position that needs strengthening in our side. Not sure whether there is an element of resentment for players that leave that comes into it when we evaluate them.
That’s because he never played 3 decent games in a row and his bad ones were where he appeared not to be concentrating or showing intensityAgreed. After his first season, don’t think he ever played more than three games in a row in defense. Not sure how you could argue he was given a chance to settle into that position. Last year was the perfect example, perfect chance to play him for half a season to see what we had when Gardner went down. Was brilliant against Brisbane in Ballarat, a little down against the Suns in a ten goal win, straight out of the side and not seen again for three months.
He still has holes in his game for sure, has moments which would still be a frustrating player to watch. But he should definitely still be in our side and would be our best key defender right now.