Scandal Luke Slayers

[wcenuff]

Definitely was "hacked" by the wife, who found out about the affair. Now has a conflict of interest with one of Carlton's major sponsors and can no longer be pres - all makes sense...

 

[Toump Ass]

Shame, I thought he was doing a great job.

 

[Cyclops]

There's a half worn down speed hump at Ikon Park that'll have to do

 

[LordLucifer]

Did he step down himself or was he hacked again?

Clever !!

 

[cowboy18]

I feel like the snake escaping the cage thread in this forum was before it's time.

 

[McIvor]

The AFL genuinely think people are morons and buying this story. Another hairbrained outcome that the three stooges, Dillon, Kane and Meade think the gullible masses will easily buy because they are all so high and mighty.

No one buys for a second anytime an agreed outcome is reached with a C-Suite exec, coach, President etc. where they "resigned" that they weren't sacked or threatened if they don't fall on their sword.

I swear this current administration surely will go down as the worst in history.

Perhaps Laura can make one of her BS contrived little videos to tell us how right the AFL and she is that he had no case to answer?

 

[Joe_Armstrong]

Jesus the AFL really have a culture of looking after scumbags, whatever keeps their image as squeaky clean as possible..

I wonder if this plonker has learned what a DM is yet.

 

[Jakksynn]

Definitely was "hacked" by the wife, who found out about the affair. Now has a conflict of interest with one of Carlton's major sponsors and can no longer be pres - all makes sense...

Actually brilliant revenge. Ruin the reputation of both involved with natural consequences. Sit back and laugh.

 

[TazD]

Can this Hacker target Hinkley next?

 

[Piggy Smalls]

Pretty convenient for the AFL that he stood down, and pretty convenient for Sayers that the AFL investigation vindicated him.
Immoral scumbags sure do know how to look after one another.

 

[Grave Danger]

Pretty convenient for the AFL that he stood down, and pretty convenient for Sayers that the AFL investigation vindicated him.
Immoral scumbags sure do know how to look after one another.

"Here's the deal, Lukey boy..."

 

[Bont the Lord]

Can this Hacker target Hinkley next?

They can post a picture of Kane Cornes. Similar looking to Mr Sayers pic.

 

[BG__]

The use of terminology saying 'compromised' instead of just saying 'hacked' seems weird to me.

A - He sent it, evidence showed it was sent by him but he's adamant it wasn't, so they just take his word and say it was somehow 'compromised'

B - Someone with access to his devices (Mrs) posted it

 

[Sentinel]

Clearly his position was untenable and today's ruling gives the AFL a win by seeing the back of him and Sayers a win by not having his name tarnished with a black mark (as much as we can all raise our eyebrows).

I do wonder if there remains any scope for a police or Fair Work investigation, independent of what the AFL "investigated", should anyone want one.

 

[emblurr]

We'll do you a solid and clear you, but you have to resign. This is the AFL version of 'resigning early because you're going to get fired anyway'. I'm glad to see no-one is buying this bs.

 

[Nostradumbass]

What a dumb campaigner

 

[sosos]

Is there a grass hill they can rename and dedicate to ‘Sayers Knob’ at Carlton?

* grass tuft.

 

[Sir_Loin]

Did he step down himself or was he hacked again?

This is exactly what happened

 

[Sqotty from office works]

Did he step down himself or was he hacked again?

We DONT allow shifty people at our club.

 

[Pistol Night]

We DONT allow shifty people at our club.

Where do you hold all your board meetings then? Off site?

 

[Satan]

We DONT allow shifty people at our club.

Pigs arse

 

[Bont the Lord]

Where do you hold all your board meeting then? Off site?

Kittens

 

[pjcrows]

Imagine the skeletons this bloke knows about.

 

[PetterdHoisted]

Nonsensical, can only be a whitewash yet again from AFL, unbelievable.

if it was a known family member or associate that posted the pic, isn't that a crime? (revenge pr0n laws)

 

[Saucery]

Reminds me of the Melbourne tanking saga, exonerated but fined $500,000. AFL finds no wrongdoing, so guy has plausible deniability as long as he falls on his sword (yeah that's a pun if you were wondering).