Scandal Luke Slayers

Remove this Banner Ad

She's hopefully devastated enough to report it to the AFL Integrity Unit. I assume they can investigate club presidents, or do they only go after the big fish like first year players on mad mondays?
Well Simon Lethlean ended up as club CEO after his own scandal.

By that precedent Sayers is right where he should be.
 
Also, it is a certainty carrying on a relationship with an officer of a company she sponsors would be a conflict of interest. Definitely in HR territory herself.

Remember in the Office how Meredith was sleeping with that guy to get cheap steak?
 

Log in to remove this ad.

I'm no Twitter expert, but I thought the 7 report said she hadn't been active on the platform since 2017 or something? I assume that means she hadn't made any posts.

So, again, just an assumption, but for him to contact her via her username, when she's essentially an 'inactive user' would indicate to me that they've used the platform to message each other previously (for whatever reason) and that she uses X to send messages, but not to post anything publicly. Please correct me if I'm wrong?

Certainly could be the case. People do maintain accounts and rarely post, just scroll and like, but likes aren't public anymore so it's hard to know if an account is truly active or not.
 
Tbf to her that’s possible. There’s been no evidence at all that she was a willing participant in this so unless there is, can’t really judge her.
I know, and she could obviously be devastated even if she has done nothing wrong. This is just speculation.
 
My Facebook got hacked last year, they got in, sent most of my messenger contacts a link, even people I hadn't messaged in 10 years.

However, I was able to get straight in within the hour first try, notify everybody I'd been hacked and change my password. No issues since.

What I'm saying is the second part of Sayers story is plausible, the first part about only messaging one person is a toss up.
 
My Facebook got hacked last year, they got in, sent most of my messenger contacts a link, even people I hadn't messaged in 10 years.

However, I was able to get straight in within the hour first try, notify everybody I'd been hacked and change my password. No issues since.

What I'm saying is the second part of Sayers story is plausible, the first part about only messaging one person is a toss up.
Similar story. A mate was hacked on FB and sent a link. Was messaging people within minutes not to click on it.
 
If this is the case, would seem to be covered by the revenge **** provisions of the Online Safety Act.

Though following on from this theory, to take that course, he'd be giving up the whole "I have no idea how this happened, I'm going to find these lousy hackers and bring them to justice" crusade and admit he's fkd up.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

My Facebook got hacked last year, they got in, sent most of my messenger contacts a link, even people I hadn't messaged in 10 years.

However, I was able to get straight in within the hour first try, notify everybody I'd been hacked and change my password. No issues since.

What I'm saying is the second part of Sayers story is plausible, the first part about only messaging one person is a toss up.
The likelihood of the perfect coincidence occurring where a "hacker" gets into his account, then manages to find a saved pic of his old fella on one of his devices, then tagging a female staff member of a major sponsor of the team he is President of is getting into being struck twice by lightning sort of territory.
 
My Facebook got hacked last year, they got in, sent most of my messenger contacts a link, even people I hadn't messaged in 10 years.

However, I was able to get straight in within the hour first try, notify everybody I'd been hacked and change my password. No issues since.

What I'm saying is the second part of Sayers story is plausible, the first part about only messaging one person is a toss up.
toss up. Lol
 
The likelihood of the perfect coincidence occurring where a "hacker" gets into his account, then manages to find a saved pic of his old fella on one of his devices, then tagging a female staff member of a major sponsor of the team he is President of is getting into being struck twice by lightning sort of territory.

In fairness (and I really DON'T need an answer to the following): I'm not sure if the old fella in question has been positively identified.
 
My Facebook got hacked last year, they got in, sent most of my messenger contacts a link, even people I hadn't messaged in 10 years.

However, I was able to get straight in within the hour first try, notify everybody I'd been hacked and change my password. No issues since.

What I'm saying is the second part of Sayers story is plausible, the first part about only messaging one person is a toss up.

Yah… sent a link.

Often what scammers do so they can trap more people.

Sending a random dick pic to one woman?

A Nigerian or Russian bot did this? Lol
 
Just an incredible lack of game by Luke too.

Here’s a tip for all the boys out there...

Women don’t want to see a picture of your dick.

It doesn’t turn them on.

They’re not men. They’re not erotic visualists. They’re women.

She doesn’t want it, she doesn’t like it, and it doesn’t get her excited. If she says so she’s lying to be polite.

I’ll allow it in a very, very long term relationship or marriage if the woman asks for it, for whatever reason.

Other than that, the only reason a women is happy to see a picture of your dick is so she can put it in a group chat and laugh about it with her friends.

Imagine a man in his 50s not knowing this. What a ****ing loser.
 
Not sure if this aspect has been mentioned but what about the status of the woman?

If she is in a relationship a potential affair has just been outed.

Has she engaged in a back-and-forth of photos as well?

A lot of layers to this and could also stuff up her career.
Hope so, the messier and uglier this scandal is the better for everyone.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Scandal Luke Slayers

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top