- Nov 7, 2010
- 27,264
- 36,610
- AFL Club
- Geelong
- Other Teams
- WADA
LOL.
Nah, I just think it's spot on actually.
It passes the time PO till something actually happens, how many days to go now?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Sydney v Brisbane Lions - 2:30PM AEST Sat
Squiggle tips Lions at 61% chance -- What's your tip? -- Ticketing Buy, Sell -- Teams on Thurs »
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Grand Final
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
LOL.
Nah, I just think it's spot on actually.
It passes the time PO till something actually happens, how many days to go now?
He did superbly that day, remember it well. No way did we look like we were going to get up at 1`/2 time.I seam to have something in the back of my mind about loosing Scarlo and Harry against the Hawks a couple of years back he was asked to play tall that day, how did that go.
Tall is not determined solely by height, it's determined by whether the player plays tall or not. As I said, Mackie could on height terms play tall sometimes, but he doesn't play that way, and probably never will.
Drum on the other hand does play 'tall' roles so it's not a stretch to call him that even at 191. Keep in mind Gillies and Scarlett are only 192. It's not solely about height, it's about whether you play tall or not.
Agree about the wing / half forward flank option.Yeah I think it is. Mackie is a running type player with height as an advantage. If he put on weight it would slow him down inmensely. Franklins playing weight in 2008 was somewhat lighter than his current 102kg and he hasn't been the same since (with a few exceptions). As great as J Brown is he has the turning circle of a truck. It's good to have strength but you need to be conditioned to be agile/fast enough to keep up with the best. If you're good in the air and can jump or you're creative with how you stop opponents (ie Scarlo) you can bridge that 4-5cm gap pretty easily but I wouldn't think Mackie would be that option. Wouldn't mind seeing him on the wing/hff.
Yeah I think it is. Mackie is a running type player with height as an advantage. If he put on weight it would slow him down inmensely. Franklins playing weight in 2008 was somewhat lighter than his current 102kg and he hasn't been the same since (with a few exceptions). As great as J Brown is he has the turning circle of a truck. It's good to have strength but you need to be conditioned to be agile/fast enough to keep up with the best. If you're good in the air and can jump or you're creative with how you stop opponents (ie Scarlo) you can bridge that 4-5cm gap pretty easily but I wouldn't think Mackie would be that option. Wouldn't mind seeing him on the wing/hff.
Agree about the wing / half forward flank option.
Has shown ability to kick a long goal in the past and can generate good pace and use it well. Worth a look !!
I think the key word is weight. Mackie does absolutely have the height to play a key position, but he isn't big enough. Scarlett is, Taylor is, Lonergan is (which is why I don't want all three in one side). But Mackie isn't. He can do a job occasionally, and did memorably against Franklin a couple of years ago. But you can't expect him to handle stronger key forwards, he just doesn't possess the size.
Agree about the wing / half forward flank option.
Has shown ability to kick a long goal in the past and can generate good pace and use it well. Worth a look !!
One way to break the forward pressure of the Pies would be a 40m + diagonal kick from FB/CHB lines - avoid the swarm by kicking over it.I have been trying to spruik Mackie up as a wing option for awhile. He would be our Matthew Richardson equivalent and could be a potential game changer for us. Has great toe, attacking flair, a suprising amount of courage and has proved to be a decent mark as well.... Using him on the wing would allow us a contested attacking option to launch into a forward assault. I hope it gets tried.
As for Drum - i still urge all people to reserve judgement until we actually see him in some sort of capacity take the field! I have low expectations for him based on the fact that he has missed a lot of football. We can only hope he exceeds this.
Yes, I'd back us in contests as well but we need to ensure we create the contest well away from where the forward pressure is hottest.I agree F2G, we have a distinct advantage over a lot of teams in that we are phenomenally good at 1:1 contests both in the air and on the ground. Kicking across lines to contests - or nominated players such as Bartel/Mackie and perhaps even Menzel or Duncan, could be a very viable tactic. It remains to be seen....but surely spreading the play by going to more contests would beat congested pressure? I will always maintain that we have the best collective group of individual players at the moment....its just we have been out-coached over the last few years.
That's what I meant by it being determined by whether a player 'plays tall' or not, I probably just should have phrased it in a more clear way.
Btw, I agree with you about the 2 talls not 3, it's one of the reasons why I want Gillies or Drum to come on and push Lonergan out.
[/b]
So yesterday Gillies and Drum were talls and today there not, I think I'm starting to get get the hang of things
I said they were FLEXIBLE talls, and Lonergan is not IMO.
I may be in the minority here but I can actually see upside in Lonergan this season.I said they were FLEXIBLE talls, and Lonergan is not IMO.
Agree PO. That's why I said he should count his lucky stars that Drum is injured and Gillies had a poor 2010. The bloke was there to plug a hole, everything being equal and everyone match-ready. There's not a chance he's in the best 22
I think you're the majority mate. I'm always the one that attracts derision for daring to say I don't rate him as a defender. Of course, I want him to play well but I won't be happy if other defenders don't get opportunities when they need to. I've said it once before I always start sweating and have anxiety attacks when the oppositions kicks it to a one on one with lonners down there.. I saw the crows game last year and tippet and walker owned him and then I saw the Brisbane game and both fev and brown owned him and against collingwood he was owned by cloke, brown and even daisy Thomas
As said a few posts ago, Scarlo was on a flank or a pocket standing Walker. Admitedly, the ball was coming down there a he'll of a lot against the Crows but my mate sitting next to me (who has been in the AFL system) asked me "how can you be a dual premiership side with such an amazing win/loss ratio and have this bloke as your stopper at full back?" I had no rebuttal..
Same goes with the Brisbane game: we were belting them and the only time they had any chance of scoring was when they got the odd long kick away and whoever Lonergan was supposed to be manning took an easy, almost uncontested mark and slotted a major..
I don't hate Lonners, just think as a key defensive option he's no good. He looked alright at Full Forward a few years ago and I just hope our backline can get settled with Drum and/or Gillies so this bullshit parade can end