Conspiracy Theory Martin Bryant and Port Arthur - Conspiracy or Cheddar?

Remove this Banner Ad

The PM doesnt just call ASIO officers and direct them to murder 30 odd people you know?

Dozens of people would have been 'in on it' in ASIO and in the Federal Cabinet as well. And all of those people have family.

And as a hint, people don't join ASIO or ASIS to murder Australians, so one of them would have said something. And seeing as the whole operation was ordered by a Liberal PM, you don't think the Labor party members would have said something about it if they found out, and had Howard imprisoned for life?

****s sake mate, have you got any idea how the Government actually runs?

Also, isnt the whole 'it was a conspiracy' based largely on shit like Tasmanian Hospitals being emptied, and TASPOL being shut down for the day? So those guys must all be in on it as well.

The guns were Bryants. There were dozens of ****ing witnesses that saw him do it. There were psych reports saying he was a likely candidate. He was apprehended literally running out of a burning building holding one of the weapons used to kill everyone. In front of a dozen cops. He plead guilty. He mentioned nothing about any 'operative' at any stage.

How did 'the ASIO marksman' get his guns, kill everyone with them, get one of them back to Bryant, get Bryant to a servo, set the servo on fire, and sneak away from the servo (surrounded by Cops)?

And why did Bryant never mention this fact to anyone?
 
The PM doesnt just call ASIO officers and direct them to murder 30 odd people you know?

Dozens of people would have been 'in on it' in ASIO and in the Federal Cabinet as well. And all of those people have family.

And as a hint, people don't join ASIO or ASIS to murder Australians, so one of them would have said something. And seeing as the whole operation was ordered by a Liberal PM, you don't think the Labor party members would have said something about it if they found out, and had Howard imprisoned for life?

****s sake mate, have you got any idea how the Government actually runs?

Also, isnt the whole 'it was a conspiracy' based largely on shit like Tasmanian Hospitals being emptied, and TASPOL being shut down for the day? So those guys must all be in on it as well.

The guns were Bryants. There were dozens of ****ing witnesses that saw him do it. There were psych reports saying he was a likely candidate. He was apprehended literally running out of a burning building holding one of the weapons used to kill everyone. In front of a dozen cops. He plead guilty. He mentioned nothing about any 'operative' at any stage.

How did 'the ASIO marksman' get his guns, kill everyone with them, get one of them back to Bryant, get Bryant to a servo, set the servo on fire, and sneak away from the servo (surrounded by Cops)?

And why did Bryant never mention this fact to anyone?
Where did I say that the PM did that?
You’re just adding all these extra details to suit your narrative.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

We all know deep down that it wasn’t that Gumby called Martin Bryant. His kill rate was impossible.

You don't need to be smart to be a good shot. Einstein was not a marksman.

He only pleaded guilty after being locked away for 5 months in solitary confinement.

He plead guilty because he did it. The guns used were his (and he was armed with one when they caught him, on fire, running from a servo). Multiple witnesses saw him do it.

At no stage during or after has he raised the fact some strangers set him up, killed everyone, and then gave him back his guns.
 
Full version of this "I Was Actually There" Series can be seen on ABCTV iView. I watched it last night and afterwards spent some time on "X" and saw Port Arthur was trending. Thankfully some of it was for a place in the US with the same name, but there were a few courtesy of some Aussie nutters, including mick the oztrucker idiot who has appeared on Sky News and is considered a mate by Rowan Dean, been on podcasts with Caroline Di Russo.

It's just so depressing to see how many idiot conspiracies there are that people believe that insult the people who had to experience such a horrific trauma.

 
Last edited:
We all know deep down that it wasn’t that Gumby called Martin Bryant. His kill rate was impossible. He only pleaded guilty after being locked away for 5 months in solitary confinement.
The kill rate is just rubbish. The cafe was tiny - he was shooting the elderly - it’s harder to miss than hit - especially with a semi auto gun.

He wasn’t hitting a moving target from 500 feet.
 
The kill rate is just rubbish. The cafe was tiny - he was shooting the elderly - it’s harder to miss than hit - especially with a semi auto gun.

He wasn’t hitting a moving target from 500 feet.
Almost every recruit manages below 300mm groupings at 100m on their first time on the range. Most much smaller than that.

Any conspiracy theorist telling you it's a difficult act of marksmanship has zero clue.
 
The kill rate is just rubbish. The cafe was tiny - he was shooting the elderly - it’s harder to miss than hit - especially with a semi auto gun.

He wasn’t hitting a moving target from 500 feet.

People sitting down at tables and then people who were trapped in the gift shop with no way out.

That's where Bryant got the vast majority of his kills and people think that's a sign of some elite marksman
 
Wendy saw someone else. Only Wendy however - Wendy might not be all there.
I’m pretty sure Wendy was awarded a medal for her bravery that day, she may well have saved a few lives. She was the first person on the scene providing first aid in the cafe with 20 or so dead and no idea where the gunman was, she was extremely courageous and has been severely traumatised ever since. Her testimony is far different from the official narrative, from the below talk she wanted a Coronial enquiry more than anything (which should have occurred).

Wendy states in this talk that she DID NOT see the gunman. I think there were at least 3 different survivors who said he wasn’t the shooter, including the ex owner of the cafe that had known Martin since he was a child. Different witnesses all describing the gunman as having acne/pockmark skin (which doesn’t describe Martin). Nobody had identified him as the shooter until after his picture was illegally placed in the paper as the killer, one of the witnesses described the shooter wearing the clothes from the picture of Martin Bryant in the newspaper.

 
I’m pretty sure Wendy was awarded a medal for her bravery that day, she may well have saved a few lives. She was the first person on the scene providing first aid in the cafe with 20 or so dead and no idea where the gunman was, she was extremely courageous and has been severely traumatised ever since. Her testimony is far different from the official narrative, from the below talk she wanted a Coronial enquiry more than anything (which should have occurred).

Wendy states in this talk that she DID NOT see the gunman. I think there were at least 3 different survivors who said he wasn’t the shooter, including the ex owner of the cafe that had known Martin since he was a child. Different witnesses all describing the gunman as having acne/pockmark skin (which doesn’t describe Martin). Nobody had identified him as the shooter until after his picture was illegally placed in the paper as the killer, one of the witnesses described the shooter wearing the clothes from the picture of Martin Bryant in the newspaper.


She is hard to understand - was she drinking before doing this?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Conspiracy Theory Martin Bryant and Port Arthur - Conspiracy or Cheddar?

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top