tigs2010
Pick 1...
This speech suggests the match was over before it started. He didn't believe he can beat Sinner.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ivanisevic was 0-3 at Wimbledon before he finally won his first and only GS there against Rafter in 2001.Djokovic has 13 losses in finals so would be a decent effort
Must already have most losses in finals without winning one. Hard to think of anyone who could have more
I can see Alcatraz dominating Roland Garros and Wimbledon and Sinner the US and Australian Opens, hopefully there are other players will bob upIf it was only once maybe, did it twice. WADA don’t like that. Look he’s not going to get a significant ban anyway at most it’s the French (which he won’t win anyway) and Wimbledon (which Carlos is a raging hot favourite in) he will miss. He’s not getting more than 6 months and frankly doubt it’s more than 3.
If it was only once maybe, did it twice. WADA don’t like that. Look he’s not going to get a significant ban anyway at most it’s the French (which he won’t win anyway) and Wimbledon (which Carlos is a raging hot favourite in) he will miss. He’s not getting more than 6 months and frankly doubt it’s more than 3.
This speech suggests the match was over before it started. He didn't believe he can beat Sinner.
Ivanisevic was 0-3 at Wimbledon before he finally won his first and only GS there against Rafter in 2001.
He's either doping or his not, there's no half measures.
Anyway, well done Cahill.
I can see Alcatraz dominating Roland Garros and Wimbledon and Sinner the US and Australian Opens, hopefully there are other players will bob up
He's lost once from 37 matches the past 6 months...Just in great form & on one of those winning rolls atm...However, it may come to an abrupt end for a while in a few months timeDidn’t have to, Ruud was his toughest player on route, a bye in the quarter final and virtual bye in the semi (thank Med for flopping on that kid for that).
Did what he had to tonight though yikes Zverev helped him. He should have won the second set that was his chance
They will use him as an example in my opinion but it won’t be a year long ban to be honest. Do I agree with it no but the minute they decided to appeal said a lot whereas they aren’t appealing Iga’s one
I can see Alcatraz dominating Roland Garros and Wimbledon and Sinner the US and Australian Opens, hopefully there are other players will bob up
Their stance on this stuff is so inconsistent though.
6 months would hurt, missing the rest of thd slams for the yearMy view is very consistent- there’s no need for it in the sport. These athletes are paying nutritionists how much? They know exactly what they are putting in their body or on their body.
Doesn’t mean he’ll get some 2 year ban no. Would I personally give him 3-6 months yes.
My view is very consistent- there’s no need for it in the sport. These athletes are paying nutritionists how much? They know exactly what they are putting in their body or on their body.
Doesn’t mean he’ll get some 2 year ban no. Would I personally give him 3-6 months yes.
Iga copped 1 month I thinkThankfully yes likely gets a slap on the wrist though can see a 3-6 month ban
Too soon!Ivanisevic was 0-3 at Wimbledon before he finally won his first and only GS there against Rafter in 2001.
Thought I just saw Ken Hinkley.
Should be no ban given the facts and WADA accepting there was no intentionality on his part.
Jannik Sinner’s doping case explained: What WADA appeal means for tennis
The men's world No. 1 could face a two-year ban. Here's what to know about the doping proceedings against him so farwww.nytimes.com
Article mentions 1-2 years which is extremelly excessive in my opinion.
No he 'whips, slashes and burnsI spotted some melasma on Janniks skin, I find it hard to believe he slip slop slaps.