Mick Malthouse do us all a favour.

[itsintheblood]

SHUT THE HELL UP.

You won the game so lets move on. To sit there and criticise wallace for being too attacking is something we really don't care about coming from you. For five years we have put up with the chip, stop, sideways kick, over posessive gameplan of danny frawley and now we have someone who wants the team to actually score a few goals and you sit there and criticise it? Fair dinkum. You may want collingwood to play a particular type of crap football like they did last year and miraculously got you into 2 grand finals but i want my team to be attacking and if that means trying to win by 50 instead of 25 points then I'm all for it. Tiger fans have had a gutful of crap defensive football which has got us nowhere. We were coached by a wooden spoon defender and the results were visible.

Apologies if there was already a thread on this.

 

[Lensen]

I love it when coaches are criticised for giving boring, bland, going-through-the-motions answers to questions, then when one actually gives an honest answer he's then criticised anyway.

If the following happened:

Q: So, Mick, when you were 25 points down you looked gone. What was the mood like in the box?
MM: Yeah, we just thought if we kept trying and running we could turn around.

Snore.

Instead, he says truthfully that he felt htey were always in it because Wallace tries to bury teams, and now he's arrogant.

Do we want honesty, or boring cliched answers?

 

[dees_best]

Meh.

I don't see the big deal.

Mick is a quality coach and I respect his opinion (unlike Sheedy who is a quality coach but is a tosspot).

 

[rick James]

Do we want honesty, or boring cliched answers?

Neither coming from Mick.

Now the Rev on the other hand... THERE'S an entertainer

 

[The Phat Side]

SHUT THE HELL UP.

You won the game so lets move on. To sit there and criticise wallace for being too attacking is something we really don't care about coming from you.

It appears, in fact, you do.

 

[morgoth]

If you read the comments it was actually interesting. MM all but admitted that when his teams get x points in front he seeks to shut the game down and lock in the win. Wallace was the opposite and MM feels that gives him a chance. Wallace would feel MM shutting the game down keeps them in touch.

 

[Coyote]

It was a bit unprofessional of mick to make such a comment, coaches should not judge eachother, just there own clubs.

 

[morgoth]

He did not judge, just stated how he sees Wallace coached teams play. he made the same comments earlier in the week re a leopard not changing its spots.

 

[Wildman]

If you read the comments it was actually interesting. MM all but admitted that when his teams get x points in front he seeks to shut the game down and lock in the win. Wallace was the opposite and MM feels that gives him a chance. Wallace would feel MM shutting the game down keeps them in touch.

Thats the way I saw it,don't think he was having a shot at Wallace as a coach.

 

[JeffDunne]

Mick just likes to slag off opposition coaches when they win - implying his coaching won the game.

When they lose he blames his players.

The guy is a first class dipstick.

 

[worthy]

Always the entertainer

 

[Parky]

Mick just likes to slag off opposition coaches when they win - implying his coaching won the game.

When they lose he blames his players.

The guy is first class dipstick.

And the question is -who has the bigger chip on their shoulders? St Kilda FC or New Zealand? Get over it Saints, your jealousy of all things Collingwood is tedious. Why don't you pay all your creditors 5 cents in the dollar like the good old days. Would have saved you a bit of money with Blighty... And I see Waldron is doing the same thing at the Storm for what he got his marching orders from the Saints for....

 

[bettsie]

you are bad at making topics.

 

[The Scarecrow]

It would appear Footy is back for another year.

 

[JeffDunne]

And the question is -who has the bigger chip on their shoulders? St Kilda FC or New Zealand? Get over it Saints, your jealousy of all things Collingwood is tedious. Why don't you pay all your creditors 5 cents in the dollar like the good old days. Would have saved you a bit of money with Blighty... And I see Waldron is doing the same thing at the Storm for what he got his marching orders from the Saints for....

Why does every response from a Collingwood bogan include the words "your jealous"?

Apart from the obvious spelling mistake, WTF is there to be jealous of? Christ you are the one club that makes our off-field record look normal and you have won as many flags in my lifetime as the Saints.

So please explain why on earth anyone would be jealous of Collingwood?

 

[morgoth]

Give Mick a break Jeff, you guys have the next 4 flags in the bag according to GT so we have to get off on something.

 

[Parky]

Why does every response from a Collingwood bogan include the words "your jealous"?

Apart from the obvious spelling mistake, WTF is there to be jealous of? Christ you are the one club that makes our off-field record look normal and you have won as many flags in my lifetime as the Saints.

So please explain why on earth anyone would be jealous of Collingwood?

Dunno, better ask cornflakes why he is so testy about the Pies. Maybe hasn't got over the Crapuano incident yet. As for Saints supporters, years of failure would make you envy anything and everything. Hope the saints do well this year as they seem like a good group of blokes (the players) and Harves deserves a good send off. As for the trolling saints supporters on this site... get a life bogans.

 

[morgoth]

******** em!

the highlight of last season was those bone head Aint fans running on the ground when they had Port on the ropes. Dud club that will always find a way to ******** up. At least our ********-ups are not due to our supoprters!

I bet JD, Firetruck and Joffa were out there with those dumb ass grins on their faces.

 

[JeffDunne]

 

[Jimmy_the_Gent]

I agree with Jeff on this one. I second his opinion thus far.

 

[BulldogMike]

Malthouse is just giving Wallace a warm welcome back to the mind games that come with coaching. For all we know Wallace might have been contempt with the lead through the last quarter and instead of scrapping for a draw he probably wanted to continue finding out about his new players.

 

[The Phat Side]

Why does every response from a Collingwood bogan include the words "your jealous"?

Apart from the obvious spelling mistake,

Now youve started something. All the Pie fans are going to come back with

your jellous

your jellus

your gelous

in their next posts.

 

[1980GFVideo]

I dont think Malthouse likes Wallace for some reason.

Saw Mick on Talking Football being asked about Richmonds new coaching appointment and saying he was not comfortable with the way Terry left the Western Bulldogs.

Thought that was strange given Mick did the same thing when he went to the West Coast Eagles.

 

[hotpie]

SHUT THE HELL UP.

You won the game so lets move on. To sit there and criticise wallace for being too attacking is something we really don't care about coming from you. For five years we have put up with the chip, stop, sideways kick, over posessive gameplan of danny frawley and now we have someone who wants the team to actually score a few goals and you sit there and criticise it?

Wallace has a crap gameplan and his coaching record is testimony to this, no Grand Finals and one PF.

Frawley was just plain crap in all respects.

If you are happy with Wallace just because he's better than Frawley, you're obviously not expecting too much. My Aunty would be better than Frawley.

 

[local]

Wallace has a crap gameplan and his coaching record is testimony to this, no Grand Finals and one PF.

Frawley was just plain crap in all respects.

If you are happy with Wallace just because he's better than Frawley, you're obviously not expecting too much. My Aunty would be better than Frawley.

What's your Aunty's coaching record and is she tied to any contracts at the moment?