Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 8 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Without doubt he has a bright future.
Looked very promising in the round 1 match against Sydney at the Telstra Dome and has been solid in the WAFL.
Hopefully he can stay injury free and have a long successful WCE career
Would be an absolute disaster when the ball hit the ground.HF Brown Hansen Staker????
very mobile players and strong
HF Brown Hansen Staker????
very mobile players and strong
Geez! How much would they be exposed in a footrace with some of the better half back flankers in the comp - Mcleod, Adcock, Shaw etc.
That half-forward line is a very hot and cold half forward line. I think they should play Embley deeper next year as a flanker/pocket.
Needs to learn to kick but has great mobility and agression.
Work in progress.
If I remember correctly a lot of people were predicting just before last years draft that the Eagles would take MacKenzie, but with our FIRST pick (16). I think most people were predicting that Brown would be gone before that.Will Scofield and E-Mac were huge pickups considering E-Mac could have gone about 8 picks earlier and some people though Scofield should have gone pick 30+
If I remember correctly a lot of people were predicting just before last years draft that the Eagles would take MacKenzie, but with our FIRST pick (16). I think most people were predicting that Brown would be gone before that.
Most people had Mitch going around 40ish.
His brother, Nathan, was the one everyone had going before 16.
That is how I remember the predictions as well. I am certain that most people had the Eagles taking MacKenzie in the first round in their mock drafts and both Brown twins going earlier.No way...
His brother was the higher rated (expected pick ~10), but Mitch was also expected to go in the teens or early 20s. So yeah we probably picked Mitch a bit prematurely, but he's a good get.
E-Mac should never have gone to pick 29. And guess who funded him, good old Doogs (pick 29 and 59 (ontraded with gardiner for 43).
Yes way..No way...
His brother was the higher rated (expected pick ~10), but Mitch was also expected to go in the teens or early 20s. So yeah we probably picked Mitch a bit prematurely, but he's a good get.
E-Mac should never have gone to pick 29. And guess who funded him, good old Doogs (pick 29 and 59 (ontraded with gardiner for 43).