Mitchell Johnson - Finished?

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

Could make the argument about bigger bats, smaller grounds etc. that help explain the differential. That also brings their averages closer however.

Could also argue about the quality of players each had to bowl to. All the variables.
 
Could also argue about the quality of players each had to bowl to. All the variables.


Fair enough.

That said, he'd be getting close to the top few left arm fast bowlers of all time. The only ones off the top of my head who I'd say are definitely better are Akram and Davidson.
 
Fair enough.

That said, he'd be getting close to the top few left arm fast bowlers of all time. The only ones off the top of my head who I'd say are definitely better are Akram and Davidson.

Bruce Reid was pretty good too.
 
Could make the argument about bigger bats, smaller grounds etc. that help explain the differential. That also brings their averages closer however.

doesn't make up six runs.

Overall runs per wicket in test cricket is pretty much bang on 32. For the last 10 years it's pretty much bang on 34. For the 1990's it's 31.6

If you wanted to calculate their respective averages correlated to overall test cricket, you would have Johnson at 27.8, and Akram at 23.7. A bit overly simplistic but one method nonetheless.

Still a fair difference and you gotta factor in Akram played in the toughest conditions for fast bowling, although they did put out pitches that suited their quicks given the Akram, Younis and later for a short period Shoaib Akhtar.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I think we are now seeing in MJ what Lillee saw all those years ago.


I don't

We saw it a few years ago against South Africa.

What we are seeing now is extreme pace taking wickets. Extreme pace is hard to maintain series after series, pitch after pitch.

When Mitch bowled against South Africa he had the outswinger going (inswinger to right handers).

When he had that he was damn near unplayable.

If Mitch gets that swing back - he'll be fantastic and not relying on poor batsmanship gifting him wickets.

At present though - his pace has the poms rattled. Against a SA team boasting Amla, Kallis, ABDV et al - he wouldn't have the same impact IMO
 
I don't

We saw it a few years ago against South Africa.

What we are seeing now is extreme pace taking wickets. Extreme pace is hard to maintain series after series, pitch after pitch.

When Mitch bowled against South Africa he had the outswinger going (inswinger to right handers).

When he had that he was damn near unplayable.

If Mitch gets that swing back - he'll be fantastic and not relying on poor batsmanship gifting him wickets.

At present though - his pace has the poms rattled. Against a SA team boasting Amla, Kallis, ABDV et al - he wouldn't have the same impact IMO
Didn't see the swing on that delivery that rattled right through Cook then?
 
Didn't see the swing on that delivery that rattled right through Cook then?


The movement from leg to off was off the pitch - not through the air. The movement through the air had a hint of inswing, not outswing.

Mitch took 7 or 8 at the WACA with that tailing ball taking the edge. However when batsmen learnt to let anything go pitched on off peg - he became far less damaging.

If he swings it back - then they have to play. It was that swing which made Bruce Reid unplayable at times.

Mitch had that swing with the white ball in England. He just can't translate it with the red ball.

As it is - he is demolishing the tail and some suspect cross batting techniques, but he isn't anywhere near Wasim Akram, nor the bowler he was when he destroyed Smith's hand (twice)
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Mitchell Johnson - Finished?

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top