Ochre
:o
Oh it was number 1 but this isn't the Claremont board.Must have only had WAFL flag in your top 5
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh it was number 1 but this isn't the Claremont board.Must have only had WAFL flag in your top 5
At this time of year?1.Aurora Borealis
Yep and hope localized within my kitchenAt this time of year?
Must have only had WAFL flag in your top 5
1. Gaff to have 0 CBAs for the season
2. A fit and firing Tom Cole who emulates peak Brad Sheppard
3. Gameplay change with 4 quarter efforts
Sex life?1) No
2) Not
3) There!
Could we agree to not have a position on the ladder and not play finals but just have the other clubs playing us for 4 points for their own position on the ladder every week? Pretty radical and not ideal from our POV, i realise we would prefer our players to exposure to finals, but if it placated the other WAFL clubs enough for us to be able to field a more competitive side without them pissing and moaning then it might be a good trade off.Simpson said it about right on SEN yesterday, the WAFL clubs want us to be good, just not that good - basically competitive enough to not quite make finals
I think that's similar to how Crows SANFL works. I think they still get the points but can't qualify for finals. Similar to what happened to essendon in 2013 once they were found to be drug cheats.Could we agree to not have a position on the ladder and not play finals but just have the other clubs playing us for 4 points for their own position on the ladder every week? Pretty radical and not ideal from our POV, i realise we would prefer our players to exposure to finals, but if it placated the other WAFL clubs enough for us to be able to field a more competitive side without them pissing and moaning then it might be a good trade off.
You have to wonder how much our young players actually learn playing in games where we get soundly beaten most weeks. It would be much, much better for them to play in tighter more competitive games that weren't over by half time, even if we have to make concessions to be able to get that.
#4 is a pretty high priority in my opinionBeing a greedy Kent I want four things:
1. The margin of any loss be to no more than 20 points.
2. Three rising star nominations.
3. Evidence of a new more effective game plan.
4.The Club and or Nissy announce the succession plan for the CEO position.
I am not at all fussed if we don’t win many games and finish down the bottom again, providing we give the youth a good exposed run in the league AND we reduce the magnitude of the drubbings that we have endured the past few years.
Could we agree to not have a position on the ladder and not play finals but just have the other clubs playing us for 4 points for their own position on the ladder every week? Pretty radical and not ideal from our POV, i realise we would prefer our players to exposure to finals, but if it placated the other WAFL clubs enough for us to be able to field a more competitive side without them pissing and moaning then it might be a good trade off.
You have to wonder how much our young players actually learn playing in games where we get soundly beaten most weeks. It would be much, much better for them to play in tighter more competitive games that weren't over by half time, even if we have to make concessions to be able to get that.