Who's literally being replaced by his 2ICHe's literally the governor of the RBA
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Who's literally being replaced by his 2ICHe's literally the governor of the RBA
So are you now suggesting the 2IC is now responsible for the decision of a company?Who's literally being replaced by his 2IC
Yes, as a member of the current Board of course I'm suggesting they are at least partly responsible for the decisions the Board has taken.So are you now suggesting the 2IC is now responsible for the decision of a company?
If so, why have a Governor?
So your end position here is Lowe should have no accountability if the person replacing him is a deputy.Yes, as a member of the current Board of course I'm suggesting they are at least partly responsible for the decisions the Board has taken.
Are you honestly suggesting that replacing the Governor with their deputy would do anything to change the direction of the Board?
As I said earlier, the government has effectively said today that they are happy with how the Board is operating.
lolIt's a massive kick in the teeth for Lowe, basically he's been told "you're the problem, not your organisation" which I think is pretty unfair.
I've never said he should have no accountability, of course he should. But the rest of the Board needs to have accountability too, and appointing his deputy is effectively vindicating the decisions that the Board have been taking and making it seem like the government had an issue with Lowe personally, not the way the Board was operating.So your end position here is Lowe should have no accountability if the person replacing him is a deputy.
If they had been external, you'd be fine.
You don't think it seems personal when your contract isn't renewed and the give the job to the person who had been operating as your offsider?lol
I think he'll be ok
noYou don't think it seems personal when your contract isn't renewed and the give the job to the person who had been operating as your offsider?
How else would you justify it then? What other message could this decision possibly have been sending? If the government thought the Board as a whole was doing a crap job and needed a fresh outlook wouldn't they appoint someone from outside the Board?
His public performances have been poor. So yes it would have been personal.I've never said he should have no accountability, of course he should. But the rest of the Board needs to have accountability too, and appointing his deputy is effectively vindicating the decisions that the Board have been taking and making it seem like the government had an issue with Lowe personally, not the way the Board was operating.
His public performances have been poor. So yes it would have been personal.
Edit - a portion of his role is public facing, been bad at that counts.
At the end of the day, the buck stops with him.
I do wonder if some earlier intervention might have helped.I would say a large part of his job, perhaps 90%, is communication be that internal or external
He didn’t come across well
In terms of performance, of the RBA as a whole has been poor in the last 12 months
the interest rate rises in my opinion were not necessary as the inflation related to short term supply chain issues and war. Not an over stimulated economy
I dare say the last part is the problem some people don't want to say out loudAn excellent appointment
Experienced, well groomed and non political appointment
A bonus she’s a woman
Let's be honest - the Reserve Bank governor is the best asset the government can have. They deliver all the really bad news which the government distances themselves from.Wouldn't it be better for a clean fresh start instead of going with the deputy governor who will probably deliver more of the same ?
If he can't properly explain to people the reasons why his organisation is putting them into greater mortgage stress, what does that do for public trust in said organisation?So what? Does any perceived lack of ability to communicate impact on his capacity to do his job?
Optics. You'd need a complete outsider with a different view of economics for real change. That kind of person might view the current period of inflation as being fuelled by corporate profiteering rather than out of control levels of household spending, which is supported by the evidence. And as a result, they might conclude that lowering interest rates is the way to go.As someone who's not fully around how the rates work or worries to much about what i cannot control, will sacking him mean the rates will drop, or is it all about optics.
Most people would only want to see the rates drop, and more than likely don't give a rats who's making the announcement.
I dare say the last part is the problem some people don't want to say out loud
I do wonder if some earlier intervention might have helped.
As long as she's well groomed.