As premium DPP forwards Dusty and Barlow are my spleen vent round 1, along with Pendlebury and Sidebottom for cleaning up Hannebery
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
+1Rockliff you farkin spud
Rockliff you farkin spud
I don't know but he's farkin goneWtf has happened to him?
I've had exactly the same problem since mid March whilst cruising around Asia. Wifi on the ship was slower than snails pace and cost around $50 an hour. As bad as this was, 38 nights on the QE was fantastic.Doha International Airport's shitty WiFi meant I couldn't get my team in order for this round. Missed out on a couple of rookie targets and reshuffling the team. Might lose the H2H because of this.
Houli's just a symptom of a bad performance from Richmond
He was on 9 halfway through the 2nd qtr, if he actually did something early he'd get an 80, not 56
Yeah tonight was bad, but those 68s and 78s he got are normally the lower end that other premium defenders get too (Docherty, Simpson, Biggs, Shaw, JJ etc have all scored about that also this year at times, or last year)His standard deviation is huge, I don't know If I can take the massive lows along with the highs.
Pray for a better showing next week. Plays Port so should be good for our sanity.
Yeah tonight was bad, but those 68s and 78s he got are normally the lower end that other premium defender get too (Docherty, Simpson, Biggs, Shaw, JJ etc have all scored about that also this year at times, or last year)
Anyways, you rarely trade, you talk about it all the time yet you're only on what 27 trades?
From a forward or a mid type it's shithouse and largely unacceptable (Sam Gray for etc), from a defender you hope it's just an aberration. Remember defenders rarely average above 90, anyone who averages above 90 is normally a top 6 defender.But a 56? That is pure filth
25 trades now and I forsee all 4 in the next 2 weeks being used aswell
Is there a reason why you say 'for etc'? Is it a meme or joke that I'm missing or are you getting it mixed up with e.g.? For etc doesn't mean anything.From a forward or a mid type it's shithouse and largely unacceptable (Sam Gray for etc), from a defender you hope it's just an aberration. Remember defenders rarely average above 90, anyone who averages above 90 is normally a top 6 defender.
KK was bog ordinary early last year before smashing the points out for etc, Birchall regularly scores 55-60s among 90-100s it's why he's a perennial 80-85 avg type.
WARD STOP BEING A SAM ******* JACOBS AND DO SOMETHING IN THE SECOND HALF FFS
Ward vs Sydney 65 HT 89 FT
Ward vs Port 50 something HT 88 FT
Ward vs STK 65 HT 76 3QT
I've always said etc instead of e.gIs there a reason why you say 'for etc'? Is it a meme or joke that I'm missing or are you getting it mixed up with e.g.? For etc doesn't mean anything.
Had him locked for a 100 average, thought I have the money might as well get him.Why did you go Ward anyway?
Was he really at the forefront of your mind for the top 15 mids?