I have totally no idea what you're talking about.
-
AFLW 2024 - Round 8 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
No Oppo Supporters OPPOSITION OBSERVATION XL
- Thread starter Truetiger
- Start date
- Tagged users None
STRUGGLETOWN EST1885
The reward is in the grind
- Jun 28, 2020
- 6,249
- 24,935
- AFL Club
- Richmond
Well said mate.
tigerdan
Norm Smith Medallist
I won't believe it until some millennial influencer tells us it was a work function.From today’s Age.
It was a work function, you dumb ****ing flogs.
- The function was paid for by the club, which did not receive any sanction from the AFL. The league took the view that the players, not the officials, bore responsibility for what unfolded, an AFL source explained.
- Coaches had been at the party early, from noon until about 1pm and while some had seen individual costumes, they were not aware of the context of the controversial couples theme. Senior players Josh Kelly (surgery) and Steven Coniglio (facial fractures) did not attend. A total of 42 players were present.
Django explained: More party details revealed, and why the AFL dropped Giant’s ban
The end-of-season GWS function was paid for by the club, which did not receive any sanction from the AFL.www.theage.com.au
Use archive.is if you’re stuck behind a paywall.
Masotiger
All Australian
Really? Or are you taking the p!ss?
You're someone who's almost always on the ball.
- Oct 27, 2014
- 17,737
- 121,801
- AFL Club
- Richmond
Tom Lynch is overpaid according to Collingwood fan 
Without getting him as a free agent we don't win the 2019 and 2020 flags
At the same time the Pies gave up 2 first round picks for Dayne Beams.
Without getting him as a free agent we don't win the 2019 and 2020 flagsAt the same time the Pies gave up 2 first round picks for Dayne Beams.
- Oct 27, 2014
- 17,737
- 121,801
- AFL Club
- Richmond
Fooking disgrace ...A rule which is utterly ridiculous and implemented to stop a dominate team by the AFL ....YOU FOOKING campaignerS AFL BE FOOKING DAMNED YOU CHEATING campaignerS !!!
Truetiger
Moderator
- Jun 27, 2004
- 18,538
- 21,246
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Tasmania Devils
- Thread starter
- Moderator
- #6,733
Just because it’s a work function doesn’t make it right. I could give so many examples then you wouldn’t be saying that.From today’s Age.
It was a work function, you dumb ****ing flogs.
- The function was paid for by the club, which did not receive any sanction from the AFL. The league took the view that the players, not the officials, bore responsibility for what unfolded, an AFL source explained.
- Coaches had been at the party early, from noon until about 1pm and while some had seen individual costumes, they were not aware of the context of the controversial couples theme. Senior players Josh Kelly (surgery) and Steven Coniglio (facial fractures) did not attend. A total of 42 players were present.
Django explained: More party details revealed, and why the AFL dropped Giant’s ban
The end-of-season GWS function was paid for by the club, which did not receive any sanction from the AFL.
Use archive.is if you’re stuck behind a paywall.
tigs2010
Pick 1...
Pendles getting younger by the year
Masotiger
All Australian
Tom Lynch is overpaid according to Collingwood fan
At the same time the Pies gave up 2 first round picks for Dayne Beams.
And even better, with him Collingwood do. LOL.
- Apr 13, 2011
- 7,035
- 22,483
- AFL Club
- Richmond
Lol this bloke was kicked off twitter for a while for saying some abhorrent shit didn't he?
tigs2010
Pick 1...
GIF looks eerily similar to a GWS skit. Too soon?The umpies are gonna implode
