Given he coached an Aboriginal cricket side, and was definitely associated with aboriginals for some time in public,
Teaching aboriginals the English game is one thing saying we benefitted from aboriginals would've been a total no-no.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Given he coached an Aboriginal cricket side, and was definitely associated with aboriginals for some time in public,
I don't have dates in front of me but i suspect the book was written before this info became public.
For the sake of the record, I asked Lawton if there was any story in his family about Wills playing Aboriginal football as a kid at Lexington, the family property outside Ararat. Lawton replied — and I reprint his reply here with his permission — "My mother was told by her father, Horace, Tom's brother, that Tom played some form of football with Aboriginal kids. We have no documents to prove this, but there is a family story that they kicked a possum skin sewn up in the shape of a ball.
never saw fit to mention it.
Just amazing how people can claim that Wills was not influenced by Aboriginal games, Marngrook was not codified, it was no doubt played under a variety of rules amongst different tribes, it may have been played different every time it was played, who doesnt remember as kids kicking a footy or playing cricket and just makeing your own rules up with mates as you go along, it is just a matter of what % he was influenced by Aboriginal culture as he was influenced by his time at Rugby, his time living in Victoria, his time living in Collingwood, by the people he met, the jobs he did, the pubs he drank ate etc etc etc.
Just because there is no WRITTEN word affiliating him to Marngrook, does not mean it did not happen.
Exactly. They never "saw fit" to mention it.
They also say fit not to mention a lot of other things.
You cannot selectively dismiss or assume anything.
The Australian Game of Football was released in 2006. Flanagans article on Wills was 2007. The only passage concering football is the very last paragraph, Flanagan apparently doesnt feel its worth discussion.
The Australian Game of Football was released in 2006. Flanagans article on Wills was 2007. The only passage concering football is the very last paragraph, Flanagan apparently doesnt feel its worth discussion.
Something like that can be seen to be mentioned in the family environment. The fact that it wasn't reported in the public arena is quite understandable and it would be quite reasonable for Wills to distance himself from any aboriginal associations in the company of gentry by simply not mentioning it.
T. S. Wills Cooke, Wills family member and author of the Wills family biography, The Currency Lad, strongly denies any connection between Marn Grook and Australian football. From page 180 of The Currency Lad:
"Flanagan once said that he had been told by Lawton that Tom played a game with the local boys using stuffed possum skins but when I asked him he said that that was not the case. Thus we find history rewritten to suit 'political correctness', there is no doubt that the Indigenous people played a form of football but to link that to the formalization and codification of Australian Football is a bridge too far."
Then how do you explain the case of Wills' contemporary, Frank Allan, aka "The Bowler of A Century", who proudly and repeatedly claimed that he developed his bowling finesse playing with Aboriginal weapons as a child?
The family member denying the link happens to be the most learned about the family's history, having poured through more original documents and letters than potentially anyone. It's all reproduced in his life's work, The Currency Lad.So one family member denies any link, yet 3 family members say Wills did play Marn grook.
The family member denying the link happens to be the most learned about the family's history, having poured through more original documents and letters than potentially anyone. It's all reproduced in his life's work, The Currency Lad.
Who are these "3 family members"? Lawton and..?
No, but Frank did attribute his sporting success to his early Aboriginal connection. It shows that there was no reason for Wills to avoid mentioning an Aboriginal influence due to shame or embarrassment. Frank, Wills' teammate, spoke of Aboriginal influence, and there's no indication that he was treated poorly for it. Quite the opposite actually.Did he claim he added some rules or developed a new game because he learnt the game from Aboriginals.
That's apparently what Lawton said. But I've heard that Lawton was prone to exaggeration when it came to Wills. When T. S. Wills Cooke asked Lawton about the Marngrook story, Lawton denied ever mentioning to Flanagan. I doubt Flanagan would make it up, so it shows that Lawton isn't exactly reliable.You mean IYO he happens to be the most learned.
Wills brother Horace, who told Lawtons Aunty who then told him - that is 3 people who obviously believe he did.
No, but Frank did attribute his sporting success to his early Aboriginal connection. It shows that there was no reason for Wills to avoid mentioning an Aboriginal influence due to shame or embarrassment. Frank, Wills' teammate, spoke of Aboriginal influence, and there's no indication that he was treated poorly for it. Quite the opposite actually.
Tom probably did play games with Aborigines as a child. I'm just saying the claim about the oral history passed down from Tom's brother to Lawton is almost definitely bs. Lawton most likely made it up to please Flanagan, who is very pro-Marngrook.So are you claiming that Wills talent for sport and obvious good co ordination was not due to his early years as the only white child in a district where he spoke the local dialect and played games with natives ?.
Obvious is obvious right!
But to claim he was adding some rules or wanted a similar type game to the ones he played as a child would not enhance ridicule or derision ?.
That's apparently what Lawton said. But I've heard that Lawton was prone to exaggeration when it came to Wills. When T. S. Wills Cooke asked Lawton about the Marngrook story, Lawton denied ever mentioning to Flanagan. I doubt Flanagan would make it up, so it shows that Lawton isn't exactly reliable.
Yeah I know. I'm saying that Terry (T. S. Wills Cooke) wrote The Currency Lad.Terry wrote the currency lad not Lawton
Tom probably did play games with Aborigines as a child. I'm just saying the claim about the oral history passed down from Tom's brother to Lawton is almost definitely bs. Lawton most likely made it up to please Flanagan, who is very pro-Marngrook.
So are you claiming that Wills talent for sport and obvious good co ordination was not due to his early years as the only white child in a district where he spoke the local dialect and played games with natives ?.
Obvious is obvious right!
he was less than TEN years of age. Its far more likely that his talent and co-ordination properly developed at rugby school - where he most definitely did play a form of football.
Yes. People can make up stuff about history.So Wills PROBABLY played games with Aboriginal kids, but the oral history is almost DEFINITELY BS
Rightio then!
Whats far more likely is that was already talented and coordinated and advanced for his years due to his childhood, that seems far more likely.
That is precisely why he was so good at sport.
Then how do you explain the case of Wills' contemporary, Frank Allan, aka "The Bowler of A Century", who proudly and repeatedly claimed that he developed his bowling finesse playing with Aboriginal weapons as a child?