Over soon.

[Armchair Critic]

No it doesn't, not at all.

ASADA could have said "if you meet these conditions you are ok to use AOD". The documentation could have described compliance to said conditions.

Which would mean ASADA sent Essendon evidence, they said they did no such thing

 

[mxett]

If ASADA said that then why would they bother investigating Essendon?

Because there are other substances implied arent there?

 

[mxett]

Which would mean ASADA sent Essendon evidence, they said they did no such thing

No. They advise, not necessarily pass out documentation of approval

 

[broden]

They is the club.

AOD has a potential to repair joints ie cartilage

Thought so. Thanks for the detailed answers on the other "little" bits too. Breathtaking in your ignorance and deflection

 

[mxett]

You're leaving important facts out . Your posts implies Wada said it wasn't banned but to check with ASADA and that's all the information given which once again is not true

What did I miss? s0? They said to check with ASADA

 

[broden]

No. They advise, not necessarily pass out documentation of approval

But Essendon said they have a letter, an email a...............?????

 

[mxett]

Thought so. Thanks for the detailed answers on the other "little" bits too. Breathtaking in your ignorance and deflection

And your lack of decent responses

 

[mxett]

But Essendon said they have a letter, an email a...............?????

Did they say it was from ASADA?

 

[Armchair Critic]

No. They advise, not necessarily pass out documentation of approval

So how did Essendon see it then

 

[Armchair Critic]

Did they say it was from ASADA?

Well if it's not from ASADA or WADA then it means jack then , surely you can acknowledge that

 

[mxett]

So how did Essendon see it then

Why does the documented evidence have to come from ASADA? If they were advised they could use AOD under certain conditions the documentation may well detail how they met these conditions

 

[mxett]

Well if it's not from ASADA or WADA then it means jack then , surely you can acknowledge that

Not at all, see my post above

 

[Armchair Critic]

Why does the documented evidence have to come from ASADA? If they were advised they could use AOD under certain conditions the documentation may well detail how they met these conditions

If it's not from ASADA or WADA then it useless , they are the only 2 bodies who could give the ok and get Essendon off

 

[Armchair Critic]

Not at all, see my post above

I did , it still means Jack , if you got that documentation from anyone other than WADA or ASADA it would be your duty to check with them it is correct

 

[mxett]

I did , it still means Jack , if you got that documentation from anyone other than WADA or ASADA it would be your duty to check with them it is correct

And how do you know they didnt?

 

[BOMBERS 4 LIFE!!!!]

We get it you want us punished.

 

[broden]

Why does the documented evidence have to come from ASADA? If they were advised they could use AOD under certain conditions the documentation may well detail how they met these conditions

Because Essendon said they contacted WADA. And if my recollection is right in what you have stated previously, WADA advised Essendon to contact ASADA for clarification.

And what were the certain conditions for a substance that is not approved for human use?

 

[mxett]

Because Essendon said they contacted WADA. And if my recollection is right in what you have stated previously, WADA advised Essendon to contact ASADA for clarification.

And what were the certain conditions for a substance that is not approved for human use?

Human therapeutic use. Its approved for human use.

 

[Gough]

Human therapeutic use. Its approved for human use.

Which bit of ASADA saying that it is banned under any circumstances are you struggling with?

 

[mxett]

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport...ny-circumstances/story-fnia3zb3-1226671797587


Why are the players allowed to continue to play??? Vlad should be sacked. Government should step in...,

If it was clear where are the bans from ASADA? Not sure why youre blaming Vlad

 

[coolangatta_kid]

Every Essendson supporter in this thread is burying their head in the sand, like a pack of lemmings following each other off a cliff.

Your club is screwed. Deal with it.

 

[broden]

Human therapeutic use. Its approved for human use.[/quote

By whom?

 

[mxett]

Which bit of ASADA saying that it is banned under any circumstances are you struggling with?

what was said last year? Its a legal mindfield and they know it

 

[mxett]

You doctor can prescribe it for you. Its for sale in Australia. It can be added to food in the USA

 

[coolangatta_kid]

You doctor can prescribe it for you. Its for sale in Australia. It can be added to food in the USA

Essendon will be stripped of all 2013 points and lose draft picks.

The sooner you get used to that reality the easier it will be for you when it happens.