Petition: Sign here for Cotchin

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

congratulations...i just got off the phone to Ratts, he says you will be selecting cotchin at #1...he was inspired by nearly 3 full pages of BF posters, I mean, how could he say no? Your petition worked!
























Cotchin to slip to #3 thanks :D
 
congratulations...i just got off the phone to Ratts, he says you will be selecting cotchin at #1...he was inspired by nearly 3 full pages of BF posters, I mean, how could he say no? Your petition worked!
























Cotchin to slip to #3 thanks :D

Cotchin to Richmond at #2......you dont' have Cotchin or Judd, how does it feel ? :)
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Hey guys, I know its very tempting to have an unbelievable mid-field with hopefully a pretty good ruck department. But surely you're happy with your abundance of quality midfielders and potential quality midfielders that you would take an awesome ruck prospect. As they say, a Good Big Man over a Good Little Man...
 
Cotchin. But Hughes is picking Kreuzer, because he is a disgrace. He is already under fire, so is going for the "safe option". It is well known we tried to poach Collingwood's recruiter. Hughes days as a Carlton recruiter are numbered, very soon we will have superior recruiting occuring at MC Labor park :thumbsu:
 
Cotchin. But Hughes is picking Kreuzer, because he is a disgrace. He is already under fire, so is going for the "safe option". It is well known we tried to poach Collingwood's recruiter. Hughes days as a Carlton recruiter are numbered, very soon we will have superior recruiting occuring at MC Labor park :thumbsu:

Ok, I am as much a Cotchin fan as anybody, but this is going a bit far.

I have been saying all year the two have been near on impossible to split...we have recruited the best midfielder in the league, plus Hadley for extra depth.

Drafting Kreuzer at #1 would by no means be the safe bet....if anything the opposite is probably true......WH develops a plan and sticks to it...he is very disciplined and IMO is a shrewd recruiter .......this could be our last chance to recruit such a fail-safe big guy. Having seen a little of the kids last year then watching the draft pan out, and a lot more of the kids this year, I sleep far better at nights having WH working for our club than another.
 
Cotchin. But Hughes is picking Kreuzer, because he is a disgrace. He is already under fire, so is going for the "safe option". It is well known we tried to poach Collingwood's recruiter. Hughes days as a Carlton recruiter are numbered, very soon we will have superior recruiting occuring at MC Labor park :thumbsu:

We tried to poach Collingwoods recruiter to work with Hughes, not replace him.
 
We tried to poach Collingwoods recruiter to work with Hughes, not replace him.

No, Collingwood's recruiter would have been head of recruiting. Hughes would have received a well deserved demotion. You have to have a recruiter that has the final say at the draft table. You can't have two recruiters working together, because in a situation like this, where Hughes says Kreuzer, and the COllingwood recruiter says Cotchin, who decides?

Or in 2005, when Hughes said Kennedy, and the Collingwood recruiter said Pendlebury, who decides (unfortunately Hughes for us). Hughes has a track record of major stuff ups at Fremantle and now Carlton. We've replaced Malouf and Pagan. Lets take the final and perhaps most important step and get rid of Hughes. He has already done considerable damage and will do more on Saturday. Enough is enough!
 
The Cothin camp in Disarray....we huge numbers of on ballers becuase they are a dime a dozen, should we take another....we have no ruck, no big man up forward, no big man in defence....



Deeeerrr.....im a teapot.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Petition: Sign here for Cotchin

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top