Trading Places Post Trade Period Game of Trades

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

Melb and Jessie Hogan in discussions... apparently Jessie has been playing the game for what he thinks is under his worth ..and is interested in moving Melb of course is not rapt in it but will do a seal IF its a good one. Its listening to offers

In other news Melb are on the look out for early picks..they like the draft this year and their earliest is not till the late 20's

Max Gawn has been saying he would like a bit of help ..so maybe they look at a ruck in the draft or an in system ruckman if he is good enough.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

to make it easier for some teams, we will actually start the original draft picks so that teams have more flexibility when trading
I don't quite understand the sentiment to this? If it's a post trade game including a draft and draft picks then surely the traded picks should be involved? Sure it makes it easier for teams that traded out picks for players to now do more trades but it makes it much harder for teams that lost players for picks e.g. Gold Coast as they now have lost players like O'Meara and Prestia but also have lost the picks received for them making it very difficult for them to find much trade currency.

Teams that traded players in for draft picks should have just as much of an easy time completing trades as any other team despite losing draft picks, it just means they have to trade their players. Sure a team like Hawthorn doesn't have many picks available but if they want to get picks or players in, they've got heaps of good players to trade. They should have equivalent currency to the draft picks they previously had anyway as those players are supposedly worth those picks.
 
I don't quite understand the sentiment to this? If it's a post trade game including a draft and draft picks then surely the traded picks should be involved? Sure it makes it easier for teams that traded out picks for players to now do more trades but it makes it much harder for teams that lost players for picks e.g. Gold Coast as they now have lost players like O'Meara and Prestia but also have lost the picks received for them making it very difficult for them to find much trade currency.

Teams that traded players in for draft picks should have just as much of an easy time completing trades as any other team despite losing draft picks, it just means they have to trade their players. Sure a team like Hawthorn doesn't have many picks available but if they want to get picks or players in, they've got heaps of good players to trade. They should have equivalent currency to the draft picks they previously had anyway as those players are supposedly worth those picks.

I thought this too I actually picked PORT based on there picks


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I don't quite understand the sentiment to this? If it's a post trade game including a draft and draft picks then surely the traded picks should be involved? Sure it makes it easier for teams that traded out picks for players to now do more trades but it makes it much harder for teams that lost players for picks e.g. Gold Coast as they now have lost players like O'Meara and Prestia but also have lost the picks received for them making it very difficult for them to find much trade currency.

Teams that traded players in for draft picks should have just as much of an easy time completing trades as any other team despite losing draft picks, it just means they have to trade their players. Sure a team like Hawthorn doesn't have many picks available but if they want to get picks or players in, they've got heaps of good players to trade. They should have equivalent currency to the draft picks they previously had anyway as those players are supposedly worth those picks.
It makes no sense to use original picks, otherwise there's no difference to the first trade game we played in.
 
seems like the consensus is to use the current picks as they stood after the trade period. (including compo picks etc)

if everyone is happy to do that, then we can easily change it, as the trade period hasnt started yet?

and since the draft will be an open draft, clubs wont need points for academies
 
seems like the consensus is to use the current picks as they stood after the trade period. (including compo picks etc)

if everyone is happy to do that, then we can easily change it, as the trade period hasnt started yet?

and since the draft will be an open draft, clubs wont need points for academies
Yep.
 
seems like the consensus is to use the current picks as they stood after the trade period. (including compo picks etc)

if everyone is happy to do that, then we can easily change it, as the trade period hasnt started yet?

and since the draft will be an open draft, clubs wont need points for academies
If anyone wants to look and check that their list is up to date post trades and what draft picks they have: http://www.afl.com.au/news/2016-10-20/trade-verdict-how-did-your-club-fare-during-the-trade-period shows both your current draft picks and who came in/out of the club during the trade period.
 
alrighty guys, we have 3 teams available and i am aiming for this to start tomorrow

The trade period will run from Sunday to Thursday, with Friday the DFA signing period. then the draft will start on Sunday and we may do a rookie draft after that if everyone stays interested
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Trading Places Post Trade Period Game of Trades

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top