Im guessing Lyon gave him a bake.
No Marshall is just a far better ruckman.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Im guessing Lyon gave him a bake.
No Marshall is just a far better ruckman.
One thing I really noticed was the genuine lack of talent.
Pretty spot onAgreed. Like maybe we’re already the best version of ourselves. We’re just not very good.
At a very basic level, it’s very hard to say that our forwards, midfield or defence is great, or even better than average. Not like we are sticking these mediocre aspects together with sizzling hot intensity and commitment.
To be a contender we need so many youngsters to come up well past league footballer level.. we need some proper stars. Plus some serious trades or FA’s in.
We need a key forward who is better than Wright. Happy with him as a 2 but he’s not consistently competitive enough to lead the attack.
Small forwards I think we might now be ok in time, maybe midfield is getting closer once Hobbs, Tsatas, Setterfield and Caldwell can gel.. but feel like we need one superstar piece in there.
Down back.. maybe Zerk, Reid and Hayes can do it together. But that line up 4 years away from being dominant.
When Scott says he will assess the list this year, he has all this in mind. In terms of performance we would be crazy to expect anything materially different before 2025.
I agree with with what your saying but I’m ok to reserve judgement on Scott for about the first 2-3 rounds.
I understand the idea of coming in and needing to assess things for yourself before forming an opinion or taking a stance on experienced, highly regarded players.
I am worried about the performance however - as you say, we are not a group that can flick a switch. As things stand, there is no reason to expect anything good in round 1.
Wouldn't those stats be skewed because Marshall has spent large amounts of time forward and Ryder full time rucking with him? Compared to Draper who has largely rucked solo bar a few games here and there with Phillips.I wouldn't have thought so. Marshall isn't a top 10 ruck and more than Draper is. Drapers got more hitouts, clearances and goals per game. Rowan is just better at marking around the ground.
I imagine the detail is discussed and there were allusions to the first year being a bit of a feeler/audition period for players.I'm not sure why anyone is going for a job for a list he doesn't know inside out.
How does he pass the interviews? How are interviews not descending into this level of detail?
As I type this, I am struck by the reminder of Lyon's commentary about the running capacity of St Kilda's list being a positive. Commentary he made during his first press conference.
I can't shake the feeling that everything we do is shaped by this subconscious desire to avoid a confrontation with reality.
I imagine the detail is discussed and there were allusions to the first year being a bit of a feeler/audition period for players.
Scott probably came on too late in the piece to start ruffling the list feathers and having the time to do anything about it.
He also needs to remove dodoro first.
So one step at a time.
For now, embrace that we'll lose more than we win, and probably quite badly.
Scott/Mahoney era will need until 2025 to take shape.
Wouldn't those stats be skewed because Marshall has spent large amounts of time forward and Ryder full time rucking with him? Compared to Draper who has largely rucked solo bar a few games here and there with Phillips.
Compare them at the end of this year and see who is leading which stat line. Love Draper but Marshall is clearly better.
Draper kicked 3 more goals than a bloke who spent the year forward... Marshall marks around the ground much better but that is all.
He doesn't strike me as the "suffer fools" type.Why do you believe Scott isn't all in with the Koolaiders?
It can't just be hope and stability for its sake.
That avoidance of reality has certainly been true and is likely still true of parts of the club. Whether it’s true of Mahoney and Scott…..too early to say.I'm not sure why anyone is going for a job for a list he doesn't know inside out.
How does he pass the interviews? How are interviews not descending into this level of detail?
As I type this, I am struck by the reminder of Lyon's commentary about the running capacity of St Kilda's list being a positive. Commentary he made during his first press conference.
I can't shake the feeling that everything we do is shaped by this subconscious desire to avoid a confrontation with reality.
In 2022, he smashed him in most categories except clearances which can be explained by stints in the forward line and shared ruck duties compared to solo duties for Draper.
Marshall averages way more disposals (even with stints forward) at a higher efficiency and is better marking target around the ground. You could flip a coin for tap-work but the modern ruckman is more than just that.
Come back and revisit this take in September after they've both had a full season as a solo ruck for a fair comparison. Using stats without context for a comparison like this is largely meaningless.
Agree. Sack DodoroNot to overegg the pudding, but some players have contact with some businesspeople who happen to also be coterie members, because the player does a day a week working with them or whatever.
The player benefits in developing their post-footy career, the club benefits because they can use it as an incentive to sign players with the club. But the businessman/coterie member is getting something out of it too in terms of access and tidbits and warm fuzzies helping out their beloved footy club.
Board members also have their own access to players, and some players have more contact with them than others too. Board members are supporters like the rest of us, they wanna know how things are going and have inner sanctum access and tidbits, and they are also responsible for any problems.
Now if a player is unhappy and the board is hearing things from them, and another player is whinging to someone who then shares that with his mates at a coterie function that Sheedy happens to be attending, and the coteries happen to have pull with another board member that also happens to work with a few of them at <firm>…
Meanwhile the team plays like s**t on field and as nuffy supporters they wanna raze the joint to the ground. But unlike ordinary nuffies, they have the means to exert influence…
Like it’s not a conspiracy, it’s just an incestuous old club where everyone knows everyone.
Better chance of promoting him out than sacking him imoAgree. Sack Dodoro
ike a few people have rocked up to a black tie cocktail party in board shorts and thongs looking for a meat pie.
We are currently a patch quilt side with lots of gaping holes, some good, some bad, mostly unknown. Losses and inconsistent performances will continue for the near future.
You can't build your forward line around Peter Wright or any of our forward as they aren't no. 1 forwards. Our best small forward looks like he's just smashed a family feast at KFC.
Our defenders are all midsized guys. Our mids are too similar and our recent drafting of McGrath, Perkins, Hobbs, Tsatas - all first rounders who are not good enough (yet) to push out our existing midfield base.
The coach? Who knows. I give him at least 12 months before I cast judgement. If he makes us competitive and we can grind out games and a season then thats a win.
Lots of work to do, draft better, trade better and get all the other parts working.
We have many problems, don't get me wrong. But IMO this is by far one of our more glaring issues.You can't build your forward line around Peter Wright or any of our forward as they aren't no. 1 forwards. Our best small forward looks like he's just smashed a family feast at KFC.