Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Castagna , Aarts & RCD dominating pre season and running PB'sWho's training the house down?
How is the doozy stacking up?
Is Dimma still high?
isnt he being delisted
Geez Stacky has returned in ripping nick !
(Fingers crossed)
Well, well, well.
He is being serious. I hope he stays, but find his spot hard to see if we get the 2 giants.
Good luck to the man. Don't waste the talent you have, life is too short.
Geez Stacky has returned in ripping nick !
(Fingers crossed)
I reckon we'll offer him a rookie spot if no one wants him. Same with Stack.isnt he being delisted
Clueless! Wow coming from you. What a joke you are. You have to be controversial in every post. You’re nothing but an attention seeker.I can see it. He does not have to play in the guts. A guy with that height, speed and other attributes could be quite versatile in theory. I cannot understand why he could not have a outside game
In fact with Hopper and Taranto he would be more like to make it in my book because they are more extractors to complement RCD
I know they are some posters who say bringing Hopper and Taranto is pushing RCD down the order. However, astute observers could tell nothing could be further from the truth. Hopper and Taranto could well be exactly what RCD needs to propel his progress forward and just showcases how clueless other observers are!!
That's a rather strange angle. I can understand your interest in developing RCD outside, wing for me, half back as you have stated before. But incoming Tarranto and Hopper propelling his progress might be a bit of a stretch.I can see it. He does not have to play in the guts. A guy with that height, speed and other attributes could be quite versatile in theory. I cannot understand why he could not have a outside game
In fact with Hopper and Taranto he would be more like to make it in my book because they are more extractors to complement RCD
I know they are some posters who say bringing Hopper and Taranto is pushing RCD down the order. However, astute observers could tell nothing could be further from the truth. Hopper and Taranto could well be exactly what RCD needs to propel his progress forward and just showcases how clueless other observers are!!
That's a rather strange angle. I can understand your interest in developing RCD outside, wing for me, half back as you have stated before. But incoming Tarranto and Hopper propelling his progress might be a bit of a stretch.
I can see it. He does not have to play in the guts. A guy with that height, speed and other attributes could be quite versatile in theory. I cannot understand why he could not have a outside game
In fact with Hopper and Taranto he would be more like to make it in my book because they are more extractors to complement RCD
I know they are some posters who say bringing Hopper and Taranto is pushing RCD down the order. However, astute observers could tell nothing could be further from the truth. Hopper and Taranto could well be exactly what RCD needs to propel his progress forward and just showcases how clueless other observers are!!
Don't see the 2 giants propelling him forward. Maybe make him have to develop his other strings a lot more.
Our current wings are very good IMHO. Both good in the air, run super hard, tough as nails and good to better skills. They suit our game plan to a T.
Riley develops his engine, he is good outside. If he can get to more contests then he will be a better mid. But somehow I think he's even further back in the pack once the Giants land
I see him more as a utility. a hybrid that can go mid, wing and other roles and he would have to develop skills and capability beyond getting the ball from the ruck.
In the reserves he played mainly in the guts. I think he should have been moved around a bit. Wing, half back etc..
He is a little like Ralphsmith but Ralphsmith is a better shot for goal on the mark but Ralphsmith might be a little more outside.
In this day and age with position-less football you do not know what diamonds in the rough a team has until they harness all the possibilities of player combinations and styles like what we found out when Griffiths was out injured in 2017 because it also relates to the ability of oppositions awareness and preparation to stop it or not as we saw in 2017
Agree that he hasn't been looked at anywhere else and also advocated half way through the year that a role on the wing might be a good idea as he has those attributes and it will give him another position. The GWS boys if it happens and if he stays will probably help that cause, so I half agree with you up to a point, but with that come two less positions for those trying to stake a claim, which can't really be a good thing for RCD.I see him more as a utility. a hybrid that can go mid, wing and other roles and he would have to develop skills and capability beyond getting the ball from the ruck.
In the reserves he played mainly in the guts. I think he should have been moved around a bit. Wing, half back etc..
He is a little like Ralphsmith but Ralphsmith is a better shot for goal on the mark but Ralphsmith might be a little more outside.
In this day and age with position-less football you do not know what diamonds in the rough a team has until they harness all the possibilities of player combinations and styles like what we found out when Griffiths was out injured in 2017 because it also relates to the ability of oppositions awareness and preparation to stop it or not as we saw in 2017
Maybe, he has to work on improvement in any case.
I can't help but see him further down just because there are now 2 more top end players on the list. That's it. He now has 2 more better players to compete for. So if he was 25th on the list he is now 27th. (or will be soon)
Early out ??Dion seen leaving the track - with a sore calf - at 10.20