- Jul 16, 2015
- 93,530
- 160,355
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Fighting Furies
- Moderator
- #101
Except for Richmond in a Grand Final of course
and Brisbane getting more than 3 wins!!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Except for Richmond in a Grand Final of course
and Brisbane getting more than 3 wins!!
thats North 9/10 timesLooks pretty goo
I'm just impressed we didn't finish bottom of the ladder lol
Any big injuries might be the cause of the fall?Ladder
1. Geelong - 20-2
2. West Coast - 17-5
3. Sydney - 16-6
4. Essendon - 15-7 (too high IMO)
5. Port Adelaide - 13-9 (too high IMO)
6. Western Bulldogs - 13-9
7. Gold Coast - 12-10
8. Collingwood - 12-10
-----------------------------------------------------------------
9. Adelaide - 11-11
10. Richmond - 10-12
11. Melbourne - 10-12
12. Fremantle - 9-13
13. Hawthorn - 8-14 (too low IMO)
14. Carlton - 7-15
15. St.Kilda - 6-16 (Still a little low)
16. Brisbane - 6-16
17. North Melbourne - 2-20
Hawks and Saints, the ones you thought were lowThe fall of which side?
should be higher!Just simmed through another season after a few edits
Here are the results
Ladder
1. Geelong - 20-2
2. West Coast - 17-5
3. Sydney - 16-6
4. Essendon - 15-7 (too high IMO)
5. Port Adelaide - 13-9 (too high IMO)
6. Western Bulldogs - 13-9
7. Gold Coast - 12-10
8. Collingwood - 12-10
-----------------------------------------------------------------
9. Adelaide - 11-11
10. Richmond - 10-12
11. Melbourne - 10-12
12. Fremantle - 9-13
13. Hawthorn - 8-14 (too low IMO)
14. Carlton - 7-15
15. St.Kilda - 6-16 (Still a little low)
16. Brisbane - 6-16
17. North Melbourne - 2-20
Ladder
1. Geelong - 20-2
2. West Coast - 17-5
3. Sydney - 16-6
4. Essendon - 15-7 (too high IMO)
5. Port Adelaide - 13-9 (too high IMO)
6. Western Bulldogs - 13-9
7. Gold Coast - 12-10
8. Collingwood - 12-10
-----------------------------------------------------------------
9. Adelaide - 11-11
10. Richmond - 10-12
11. Melbourne - 10-12
12. Fremantle - 9-13
13. Hawthorn - 8-14 (too low IMO)
14. Carlton - 7-15
15. St.Kilda - 6-16 (Still a little low)
16. Brisbane - 6-16
17. North Melbourne - 2-20
Ceglar actually did his ACL in Round 4 believe it or not while I also had Roughead on the Rookie list due to his real life circumstances. That and both Mitchell and Lewis out of the side they'd be weakend considerably with those 4 guys missing.Hawks and Saints, the ones you thought were low
Sounds realisticCeglar actually did his ACL in Round 4 believe it or not while I also had Roughead on the Rookie list due to his real life circumstances. That and both Mitchell and Lewis out of the side they'd be weakend considerably with those 4 guys missing.
Also, O'Meara only played 4 games for the Hawks suffering a PCL injury early in the season also
For the Saints, Riewoldt only played 6 games due to injury, Steele, Membery and Mav Weller all didn't play a game for the season
Haydo you should give this a try - all ruckman ratings to 0 and sim a season, see how it plays out. I'm thinking it won't affect hit-out numbers as regardless of their rating they are contesting a hit-out anyway, and it could drop them down a couple pegs in Brownlow voting. I assume it wouldn't affect any of their stats at all, just the 'impact' the game determines they have. Could work?
Cheers again for your hard work this year cannot wait to get stuck in!
Was thinking the same thing. I'll just have to edit Kreuzer's stats to not have him win the medal. Thing about these rucks, a few of them have a rating of 80+ in the ruck and also have a great midfielders rating. Apart from Goldstein and Gawn, not many ruckman constantly reach 20 disposals per game and that's the part I'll need to editI think this would only work for one year as new ruckman are being created each year and they would have better stats than the established ones
problem here is that the cpu controlled teams use the 'best rating' rucks, regardless of position...Haydo you should give this a try - all ruckman ratings to 0 and sim a season, see how it plays out. I'm thinking it won't affect hit-out numbers as regardless of their rating they are contesting a hit-out anyway, and it could drop them down a couple pegs in Brownlow voting. I assume it wouldn't affect any of their stats at all, just the 'impact' the game determines they have. Could work?
Cheers again for your hard work this year cannot wait to get stuck in!
dont agree with the first 2. de Goey is a natural midfielder, and saw Wills play more mid.Was looking at the positions and as a Collingwood supporter I believe a few players are in the wrong positions.
De Goey played more forward as did Wills in his couple of games.
Smith and Phillips played as sort of running half-backs so they could probably be Small Defenders.
Maynard played most of the season in the back pocket and Oxley was the same.
And Goldsack should probably be in the Tall Defender category.
Also Corey Gault retired recently.