Premiership Coach 2017 AFL lists

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

Just simmed through another season after a few edits

Here are the results

Ladder
1. Geelong - 20-2
2. West Coast - 17-5
3. Sydney - 16-6
4. Essendon - 15-7 (too high IMO)
5. Port Adelaide - 13-9 (too high IMO)
6. Western Bulldogs - 13-9
7. Gold Coast - 12-10
8. Collingwood - 12-10
-----------------------------------------------------------------
9. Adelaide - 11-11
10. Richmond - 10-12
11. Melbourne - 10-12
12. Fremantle - 9-13
13. Hawthorn - 8-14 (too low IMO)
14. Carlton - 7-15
15. St.Kilda - 6-16 (Still a little low)
16. Brisbane - 6-16
17. North Melbourne - 2-20


Disposals
1. Joel Selwood - 711
2. Dan Hannebery - 703
3. Trent Cotchin - 692
4. Dustin Martin - 686
5. Lachie Neale - 671

Marks
1. Lance Franklin - 170
2. Matthew Kreuzer - 166
3. Todd Goldstein - 164
4. Tom Hawkins - 155
5. Ben McEvoy - 149

Goals
1. Lance Franklin - 91
2. Tom Boyd - 86
3. Peter Wright - 86
4. Ben Griffiths - 82
5. Jack Darling - 81

Hitouts
1. Tom Hickey - 624
2. Max Gawn - 583
3. Nic Naitanui - 562
4. Stefan Martin - 557
5. Todd Goldstein - 539

Clearances
1. Dan Hannebery - 122
2. Joel Selwood - 119
3. Lachie Neal - 116
4. David Armitage - 113
5. Dion Prestia - 112

Tackles
1. Luke Brown - 133
2. Patrick Cripps - 116
3. Shane Savage - 113
4. Lynden Dunn - 112
5. Aaron Vandenberg - 111

Spoils
1. Will Schofield - 230
2. Allir Allir - 227
3. Josh Gibson - 224
4. Jake Lever - 219
5. Scott DThompson - 215

Rebound 50
1. Shane Savage - 155
2. Jeremy McGovern - 143
3. Andrew Mackie - 133
4. Kade Kolodjashnij - 128
5. Kade Simpson - 125

Inside 50
1. Trent Cotchin - 166
2. Joel Selwood - 156
3. Lachie Neale - 136
4. Dan Hannerbery - 136
5. Patrick Cripps - 130

WEEK 1 Finals
Port Adelaide: 19.8.122 def Collingwood: 18.7.115
Western Bulldogs: 17.10.112 def Gold Coast: 14.8.92
Geelong: 14.9.93 def by Essendon: 16.8.104
West Coast: 12.10.82 def by Sydney: 22.6.138

WEEK 2 FINALS
Geelong: 17.10.112 def Port Adelaide: 10.11.71
West Coast: 19.5.119 def by Western Bulldogs: 19.7.121

WEEK 3 FINALS
Essendon: 18.7.115 def by Western Bulldogs: 19.8.122
Sydney: 11.14.80 def by Geelong: 12.10.82

All-Australian Team
B:
Michael Hartley (Ess) - Michael Talia (Syd) - Angus Litherland (Haw)
HB: Andrew Mackie (Geel) - Kyle Hartigan (Adel) - Rory Laird (Adel)
C: Patrick Cripps (Carl) - Joel Selwood (Geel) - Patrick Dangerfield (Geel)
HF: Kyle Langford (Ess) - Lance Franklin (Syd) - Cyril Rioli (Haw)
FF: Luke Parker (Syd) - Jake Stringer (WB) - Matthew Kreuzer (Carl)
R: Patrick Ryder (PA) - Dan Hannerbery (Syd) - Lachie Neale (Frem)
INT: Marcus Bontempelli (WB) - Dustin Martin (Rich) - Mitch Robinson (Bris) - Nat Fyfe (Frem)

Brownlow Medal
1. Matthew Kreuzer - 32 votes (MAN I HATE RUCKMAN IN THIS GAME)
2. Patrick Dangerfield - 31 votes
3. Luke Parker - 31 votes
4. Dayne Zorko - 31 votes
5. Sam Mitchell - 29 votes

Grand Final
Western Bulldogs: 16.4.(100) def by Geelong: 15.13.(103)
Patrick Dangerfield was awarded the Norm Smith Medal
 
Ladder
1. Geelong - 20-2
2. West Coast - 17-5
3. Sydney - 16-6
4. Essendon - 15-7 (too high IMO)
5. Port Adelaide - 13-9 (too high IMO)
6. Western Bulldogs - 13-9
7. Gold Coast - 12-10
8. Collingwood - 12-10
-----------------------------------------------------------------
9. Adelaide - 11-11
10. Richmond - 10-12
11. Melbourne - 10-12
12. Fremantle - 9-13
13. Hawthorn - 8-14 (too low IMO)
14. Carlton - 7-15
15. St.Kilda - 6-16 (Still a little low)
16. Brisbane - 6-16
17. North Melbourne - 2-20
Any big injuries might be the cause of the fall?
 
Just simmed through another season after a few edits

Here are the results

Ladder
1. Geelong - 20-2
2. West Coast - 17-5
3. Sydney - 16-6
4. Essendon - 15-7 (too high IMO)
5. Port Adelaide - 13-9 (too high IMO)
6. Western Bulldogs - 13-9
7. Gold Coast - 12-10
8. Collingwood - 12-10
-----------------------------------------------------------------
9. Adelaide - 11-11
10. Richmond - 10-12
11. Melbourne - 10-12
12. Fremantle - 9-13
13. Hawthorn - 8-14 (too low IMO)
14. Carlton - 7-15
15. St.Kilda - 6-16 (Still a little low)
16. Brisbane - 6-16
17. North Melbourne - 2-20
should be higher! :p
 
Ladder
1. Geelong - 20-2
2. West Coast - 17-5
3. Sydney - 16-6
4. Essendon - 15-7 (too high IMO)
5. Port Adelaide - 13-9 (too high IMO)
6. Western Bulldogs - 13-9
7. Gold Coast - 12-10
8. Collingwood - 12-10
-----------------------------------------------------------------
9. Adelaide - 11-11
10. Richmond - 10-12
11. Melbourne - 10-12
12. Fremantle - 9-13
13. Hawthorn - 8-14 (too low IMO)
14. Carlton - 7-15
15. St.Kilda - 6-16 (Still a little low)
16. Brisbane - 6-16
17. North Melbourne - 2-20

Have to agree with being too high/low. Would think all 4 would be pushing for finals personally
 
Hawks and Saints, the ones you thought were low
Ceglar actually did his ACL in Round 4 believe it or not while I also had Roughead on the Rookie list due to his real life circumstances. That and both Mitchell and Lewis out of the side they'd be weakend considerably with those 4 guys missing.
Also, O'Meara only played 4 games for the Hawks suffering a PCL injury early in the season also

For the Saints, Riewoldt only played 6 games due to injury, Steele, Membery and Mav Weller all didn't play a game for the season
 
Ceglar actually did his ACL in Round 4 believe it or not while I also had Roughead on the Rookie list due to his real life circumstances. That and both Mitchell and Lewis out of the side they'd be weakend considerably with those 4 guys missing.
Also, O'Meara only played 4 games for the Hawks suffering a PCL injury early in the season also

For the Saints, Riewoldt only played 6 games due to injury, Steele, Membery and Mav Weller all didn't play a game for the season
Sounds realistic ;)

Wouldn't be surprised with them being that low. Hawks have never been world beaters in my games and Saints have never made top finals either
 
Haydo you should give this a try - all ruckman ratings to 0 and sim a season, see how it plays out. I'm thinking it won't affect hit-out numbers as regardless of their rating they are contesting a hit-out anyway, and it could drop them down a couple pegs in Brownlow voting. I assume it wouldn't affect any of their stats at all, just the 'impact' the game determines they have. Could work?

Cheers again for your hard work this year cannot wait to get stuck in!
 
Haydo you should give this a try - all ruckman ratings to 0 and sim a season, see how it plays out. I'm thinking it won't affect hit-out numbers as regardless of their rating they are contesting a hit-out anyway, and it could drop them down a couple pegs in Brownlow voting. I assume it wouldn't affect any of their stats at all, just the 'impact' the game determines they have. Could work?

Cheers again for your hard work this year cannot wait to get stuck in!

I think this would only work for one year as new ruckman are being created each year and they would have better stats than the established ones
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I think this would only work for one year as new ruckman are being created each year and they would have better stats than the established ones
Was thinking the same thing. I'll just have to edit Kreuzer's stats to not have him win the medal. Thing about these rucks, a few of them have a rating of 80+ in the ruck and also have a great midfielders rating. Apart from Goldstein and Gawn, not many ruckman constantly reach 20 disposals per game and that's the part I'll need to edit
 
Haydo you should give this a try - all ruckman ratings to 0 and sim a season, see how it plays out. I'm thinking it won't affect hit-out numbers as regardless of their rating they are contesting a hit-out anyway, and it could drop them down a couple pegs in Brownlow voting. I assume it wouldn't affect any of their stats at all, just the 'impact' the game determines they have. Could work?

Cheers again for your hard work this year cannot wait to get stuck in!
problem here is that the cpu controlled teams use the 'best rating' rucks, regardless of position...
 

Was looking at the positions and as a Collingwood supporter I believe a few players are in the wrong positions.

De Goey played more forward as did Wills in his couple of games.
Smith and Phillips played as sort of running half-backs so they could probably be Small Defenders.
Maynard played most of the season in the back pocket and Oxley was the same.
And Goldsack should probably be in the Tall Defender category.

Also Corey Gault retired recently.
 
Was looking at the positions and as a Collingwood supporter I believe a few players are in the wrong positions.

De Goey played more forward as did Wills in his couple of games.
Smith and Phillips played as sort of running half-backs so they could probably be Small Defenders.
Maynard played most of the season in the back pocket and Oxley was the same.
And Goldsack should probably be in the Tall Defender category.

Also Corey Gault retired recently.
dont agree with the first 2. de Goey is a natural midfielder, and saw Wills play more mid.
im going to keep Smith and Phillips as outside mids, as they were played down there out of necessity.
i tend to agree with you on the other couple. Maynard, Oxley and Goldsack will all be changed.
these are just their primary positions, doesnt include their 2nd/3rd positions etc.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Premiership Coach 2017 AFL lists

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top