DaTBird187
What D Farke?
- Feb 9, 2014
- 17,413
- 47,039
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Liverpool, Boston Celtics
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I have no doubt that this year, more than any other in the past 10 years or so, will have very few starting squads looking the same.
Gawn injured his knee at training today. No ACL but it’s a grade 2 MCL which is 6-12 weeks..will miss key part of pre season and may miss first few weeks of season
I have no doubt that this year, more than any other in the past 10 years or so, will have very few starting squads looking the same.
So, so many mid choices with very few of the top 40 or so being automatic selections. Rowell and Pickett are obvious but they are rookies.
In looking at your squad I would rather start with Houli over Crisp particularly with so many games played at the G early in the year. Crisp is a little too inconsistent for me. Dawson and Houston may have breakout years but I'm going with the safer options of Lloyd and Laird.
As I said earlier, the choice of top mids will be simply who you feel comfortable with. Not sure I can ride the Cripp's seesaw of 150 one week followed by a 60 the following one. Even with his 30% discount I think Mitchell could take a few weeks before he gets back to pig mode hence he is an upgrade for me as well.
I'm starting Grundy who will be my captain's option most weeks but will be going with either NicNat or Jacobs as R2.
I'm looking at Whitfield as an upgrade as I'm sure his price will fall. It certainly won't go up. Not sure about Wingard, Rozee and Brayshaw but if you see them taking a scoring leap next year, so be it. I'm surprised you are not starting with Smith. Hill is a no brainer as is Rankine.
As per DaTBird I am also starting with a predominantly guns and rookies squad. Not sure there are too many mid-pricers that scream "pick me" unlike past years. Anyway here it is. As per past years, the final squad probably won't look anything like this.
View attachment 814170
Was he in the midfield at the end of last season? He was on fire in the last 5 or so games. And I think Ollie Wines played then too. So he may be a good pick regardless. Thanks.You need Houston in backline. He will play midfield early on. Ollie wines dislocated shoulder at training today. Needs surgery and out for the start of the season.
I keep saying the same thing to myself at this time of year every year yet can't help myself. Although, in saying that, I am pretty content with the way my team looks right now.My approach this year is to trust my instinct, instead of going last second changes because of an article or a post I've just read.
FWIW, I pretty much had penciled in the more expensive players towards the end of the last year. The odd player here and there will be interchangeable as the pre-season starts.
I'm not 100% convinced with Houston. If he were to play the whole year in the middle, then he will be a good selection at his current price but if he is forced to go back to the backline due to injuries or whatever, he will score shit. I'd still rather pay the extra and go with Laird who I know will score 80* even on a bad day.You need Houston in backline. He will play midfield early on. Ollie wines dislocated shoulder at training today. Needs surgery and out for the start of the season.
Three of them will almost certainly be mids.It certainly looks attainable that we can start with only 3-5 rookies on field this year.
Three of them will almost certainly be mids.
Definitely some group think in here that is very hard to get away from. Not too surprising that a lot in here had an average season in 2019.I keep saying the same thing to myself at this time of year every year yet can't help myself. Although, in saying that, I am pretty content with the way my team looks right now.
I've treated him as a rookie as he didn't play a home & away game last year. But, I know what you mean.Two actually, as Pickett is not technically a rookie, even though he is priced as one.
There's nothing wrong with considering the comments that are put up here but you just have to consider whether what is being said is better than what you believe. I agree though that you should stay with your own instincts.Definitely some group think in here that is very hard to get away from. Not too surprising that a lot in here had an average season in 2019.
I'm not 100% convinced with Houston. If he were to play the whole year in the middle, then he will be a good selection at his current price but if he is forced to go back to the backline due to injuries or whatever, he will score shit. I'd still rather pay the extra and go with Laird who I know will score 80* even on a bad day.
Yeah, I'm not saying it is necessarily a bad thing; I was just making an observation as to the similarity of results.There's nothing wrong with considering the comments that are put up here but you just have to consider whether what is being said is better than what you believe. I agree though that you should stay with your own instincts.
Other than rookies and injuries between now and round 1, I'll be surprised if my starting 22 changes anymore than 1 or 2.
The biggest problem I have with Houston is that he will most likely play in the midfield during the Marsh pre season games and possibly even the first few rounds particularly with Wines' injury. He'll possibly average 90+ in these matches and everyone will jump on board only for him to go back to defence and return to the 60 odd average he has as a defender.Yep some considerable risk with Houston, at the moment he’s on the watch list but not inside my side.
I’d view ports as having better midfield depth than defense depth, which could easily see him rotated back at any stage.
The big appeal for a few of the players around that price, is it doesn’t take much to become potential keepers. I’d have Lloyd and Laird as top 6 locks, I still have a few queries over Crisp/Houli but they should round out the top 4. Then it opens right up, any player that can average ~90 is only going to be a few points behind the theoretical top6, so if you can nail one it’s a huge leg up. Will be selecting one of those type, just a matter of which one at this stage.
I think we sometimes get carried away with a player's position. A defender who averaged 105 or so last year is no worse a choice than a mid who averaged the same. So whether you choose to put most premiums in the midfield or elsewhere is really a moot point. At the end of the day all those who played 10 games or more last year are priced solely as to their average score last year. We have a salary which all 30 players need to fit into which necessitates that we need x amount of starting rookies on field.Im seriously warming to the idea of starting with 6 premium mids + Rowell & Pickett. Im weighing up whether it is better to start Whitfield and a mid rookie versus Macrae and a forward rookie. Currently if i pick Whitfield i wont be fielding any forwardline rookies which doesnt seem ideal as im sure at least 1 rookie will present themselves as capable enough to warrant a spot in my starting lineup. As well, i value Macrae as approximately 100k more than Whitfield. The 100k is an arbitrary amount but i came up with it given Whitfield's injury history, the fact he may be tagged sometimes meaning he could be hot and cold and therefore may be picked up cheaper later on. I still have Dusty & Greenwood as my top 2 forwards and although my backline is very weak - it is by design as i feel there are several players coming back from injury that will average a good 20-30+ above their pricing point. Yes, if i was to post my team then everyone would critique the fact that i dont have a genuine gun back there but i honestly feel more comfortable banking the midfield points and then hoping that my backline cheapies last 6+ weeks and then i can offload them.
My current midfield is this:
View attachment 818425