how it could have been predicted
If Q's mob have access to the NSA most likely through the military they could have known.
Q did post "We hear everything!" or words to that effect
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
how it could have been predicted
They will just put a bag over your head.I have all old technologies....But if they really wanted to get me with one of their drones, then there's not much I can do about it.
Soon they'll have drones in all countries to immediately liquidate & silence all dissidents on the spot.....Oh wait....Have I been watching too much 1984 & Logan's Run again?
Be interesting to see if any keywords from this are used in Trump tweets in the near future.
It's hard to say. Posting is definitely coming from several insiders with high security clearance. There's heavy use of acronyms and code words in the summary of posts, but you can work them out from the context. Extracting the true meaning is harder. The talk is in riddles. Questions are asked of the readers - they're trying to get us to work it out for ourselves and I haven't followed anywhere near closely enough to do thatI'm hearing big things are about to go down, but reading through Q posts they just make no sense to me without seeing some kind of analysis or knowing about all previous posts.
Can anyone enlighten me as to what's meant to be happening and when? Werewolf ?
It's hard to say. Posting is definitely coming from several insiders with high security clearance. There's heavy use of acronyms and code words in the summary of posts, but you can work them out from the context. Extracting the true meaning is harder. The talk is in riddles. Questions are asked of the readers - they're trying to get us to work it out for ourselves and I haven't followed anywhere near closely enough to do that
It seems to be a covert civil war between "white hats" (NSA & military) vs. "black hats" (corrupt politicians & rogue operatives).
There were references to the troubles in Saudi Arabia late last year, the Clinton foundation, the steel tariffs, dirty money, etc.
They've raised a few other conspiracy theories (suppressed cures, chemtrails, pedogate, false flags) - all quite plausibly IMO.
It's been implied that the crooks (including some household names) will be exposed and brought to justice.
Something about a damning Hillary Clinton video, something to do with the mainstream media being made redundant somehow, something to do with an internet bill of rights in the states, Snowden is mentioned a bit, and the CIA running big social media companies(fb et al)
Thanks for the explanations guys. Is there anything to confirm 100% he is not a troll or larper? The photos with Q shapes and whatnot don't do much to convince me. Have they made any verifiable statements that only an insider would know?It's hard to say. Posting is definitely coming from several insiders with high security clearance. There's heavy use of acronyms and code words in the summary of posts, but you can work them out from the context. Extracting the true meaning is harder. The talk is in riddles. Questions are asked of the readers - they're trying to get us to work it out for ourselves and I haven't followed anywhere near closely enough to do that
It seems to be a covert civil war between "white hats" (NSA & military) vs. "black hats" (corrupt politicians & rogue operatives).
There were references to the troubles in Saudi Arabia late last year, the Clinton foundation, the steel tariffs, dirty money, etc.
They've raised a few other conspiracy theories (suppressed cures, chemtrails, pedogate, false flags) - all quite plausibly IMO.
It's been implied that the crooks (including some household names) will be exposed and brought to justice.
What surprised me at first was Snowden being made out to be the bad guy for discrediting the NSA. although it sort of checks out.Something about a damning Hillary Clinton video, something to do with the mainstream media being made redundant somehow, something to do with an internet bill of rights in the states, Snowden is mentioned a bit, and the CIA running big social media companies(fb et al)
Trump has made references to Q posts in tweets and press conferences which indicate he's in the loop. Another thing I forgot to mention - human trafficking arrests have skyrocketed since Trump took over. There's a lot going on which makes me think this is real.Thanks for the explanations guys. Is there anything to confirm 100% he is not a troll or larper? The photos with Q shapes and whatnot don't do much to convince me. Have they made any verifiable statements that only an insider would know?
Song rain girl is very popular at the moment
All I saw with twitter was both Trump and Q used "+++" in a post. Nothing definitive. I wish Q would quit with the riddles for just one post and say "X will happen on day Y" and prove themselves definitively. I imagine the argument against this is that they want plausible deniability and don't want to attract MSM attention?What surprised me at first was Snowden being made out to be the bad guy for discrediting the NSA. although it sort of checks out.
Trump has made references to Q posts in tweets and press conferences which indicate he's in the loop. Another thing I forgot to mention - human trafficking arrests have skyrocketed since Trump took over. There's a lot going on which makes me think this is real.
View attachment 467886
I think like anything, to appreciate and acknowledge plausibility of any theory needs someone to have an open mind. Red pilling ppl is a gentle approach and I think rather than telling ppl straight out, you give them clues and let them figure it out themselves.All I saw with twitter was both Trump and Q used "+++" in a post. Nothing definitive. I wish Q would quit with the riddles for just one post and say "X will happen on day Y" and prove themselves definitively. I imagine the argument against this is that they want plausible deniability and don't want to attract MSM attention?
I'm not being a hater here, I lean towards believing in the Q phenomenon. But I'm sure there are sceptics lurking this forum, and if we want to red pill people and attract more posters to this board then we have to put up some evidence.
I'll stop being lazy and will do some of my own Q research to see what I can find!
Something about a damning Hillary Clinton video, something to do with the mainstream media being made redundant somehow, something to do with an internet bill of rights in the states, Snowden is mentioned a bit, and the CIA running big social media companies(fb et al)
That's crazy suspicious. How the hell did we let such large monopolies take over the MSM and tell everyone how to think?Interestingly the next day after the HRC video post two MSN outlets had different articles on a.i. and how realistic it was to fake someone.
In other words a preemptive strike on the credibility of the video
Do you believe in coincidences?
Took psychologist from nazi germany at the end of ww2 , paperclip.That's crazy suspicious. How the hell did we let such large monopolies take over the MSM and tell everyone how to think?
That was nuts. And they call us the conspiracy theorists haha. Sounds like they will release it at a precise time where it will be impossible not to get traction. Probably why q is pushing the IBOR so much atm, particularly with how much YouTube and Twitter etc censor conservative news/reports.Interestingly the next day after the HRC video post two MSN outlets had different articles on a.i. and how realistic it was to fake someone.
In other words a preemptive strike on the credibility of the video
Do you believe in coincidences?
How? Plain and simply it was money. "for the love of money is the root of all evil."That's crazy suspicious. How the hell did we let such large monopolies take over the MSM and tell everyone how to think?
Took psychologist from nazi germany at the end of ww2 , paperclip.