MGS over the line by 2 goals 68-56 or something, MGS should have won by more. Also interesting to see the Scotch 1st XVIII coach at the ground, obvisouly rates MGS a little higher than some of the supposed "experts" on this forum. Anyway
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Who did Melbourne play?dutchy12 said:MGS over the line by 2 goals 68-56 or something, MGS should have won by more. Also interesting to see the Scotch 1st XVIII coach at the ground, obvisouly rates MGS a little higher than some of the supposed "experts" on this forum. Anyway
Melbourne played Caulfield Grammar.Esham said:Who did Melbourne play?
Sutts1 said:would the larder look similar to this?
HC 3-0
SC 2-0
CG 2-1
GC 2-1
MG 2-1
XC 2-1
WC 1-2
Caul 1-2
BGS 2-0
SKC 3-0
GGS 3-0
dutchy12 said:MGS over the line by 2 goals 68-56 or something, MGS should have won by more. Also interesting to see the Scotch 1st XVIII coach at the ground, obvisouly rates MGS a little higher than some of the supposed "experts" on this forum. Anyway
chooker said:Rates MGS or rates Caulfied, either way, i doubt he'd be concerned about these 2 teams come finals time as both look doubtful to be there.
What teams should make finals?
Sutts1 said:What teams should make finals?
There is percentage this year. Otherwise there would be no way of determining the final four, with the grading sytem and all. At the end of the year it will come down to percentage........wolfey said:there's no percentage s
nutcase said:Xavier beat Geelong Grammar by 35 points (72 to 37) in what was a very gutsy effort by the geelong boys given the dissapointment of the past two rounds. they won the 1st and 3rd quarters and were down by only 15 points at the last change with the scoreboard clearly not reflecting the intensity of the game.