Richmonds dominant finals series

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Richmond didn't Bradbury it - it wasn't like the other teams they beat lost critical players or played better than them and missed crucial shots at goal. They won fair and square.
GWS without Cameron, Mumford and lose Shiel in the first quarter at which point they were behind.
About as fair and square for a MCG based team.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Hawks ave winning margin of 43.6 in 2008 was pretty good considering their tough GF opponent.
QF Hawks 127 V Dogs 76 = 51 pts
PF Hawks 118 V Saints 64 = 54 pts
GF Hawks 115 V Cats 89 = 26 pts

But yes, the Tigers played a great brand of footy in the finals.:thumbsu:
 
If Adelaide got all 3 finals at Adelaide Oval they would have had a similar winning average

Not gonna start a thread about it though

#idontactuallycare

Premiership teams don't make excuses.

That's your next step as a football club if you want to achieve success like Richmond.
 
Holy shit can Richmond supporters be banned from starting threads until the new season?
How are you holding up princess,do you need a shoulder to cry on?
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top