DeathlyAccurate
Club Legend
- Mar 28, 2023
- 1,447
- 3,709
- AFL Club
- Sydney
Almost. You were almost relevant again.
Enjoy Mad Monday at Dawson’s mum’s house. She doesn’t like him wandering off for too long.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Right In Front of Me MKII
- Thread starter DeathlyAccurate
- Start date
- Tagged users None
Almost. You were almost relevant again.
Enjoy Mad Monday at Dawson’s mum’s house. She doesn’t like him wandering off for too long.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Plugger35
Umpiring Expert
- Sep 27, 2008
- 139,994
- 162,543
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
- Other Teams
- Chelsea, Black Caps, Sea Eagles, Subiaco
The ghost of Old Kenny working the score review system, that was a goal.
- Mar 13, 2016
- 8,079
- 8,195
- AFL Club
- Carlton
Crows robbed by umps all game culminating in that goal
Almost. You were almost relevant again.
Enjoy Mad Monday at Dawson’s mum’s house. She doesn’t like him wandering off for too long.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- Mar 13, 2016
- 8,079
- 8,195
- AFL Club
- Carlton
Kenny would have seen a lot of goals kicked by Tony Lockett. Lockett - forever remembered as a Swans champion and kicking 1300 goals at the Swannies.The ghost of Old Kenny working the score review system, that was a goal.
TheCatStevensExperience
Footballl Oracle
- Jul 28, 2023
- 2,610
- 3,010
- AFL Club
- Geelong
- Other Teams
- BigBigSounders2023 Kansas City Chefs
The corrupt AFL are claiming it hit the padding on the back of the post
TheCatStevensExperience
Footballl Oracle
- Jul 28, 2023
- 2,610
- 3,010
- AFL Club
- Geelong
- Other Teams
- BigBigSounders2023 Kansas City Chefs
Holy **** saw the footage again - clearly didn't hit the post.
- Oct 19, 2020
- 25,581
- 35,532
- AFL Club
- Richmond
It was an irrefutable goal. Channel 7 just called it.
I want my money paid out.
I want my money paid out.
JoseMourinho
Not A Manager
It was a clear goal LMAO.
Was miles above the padding
It’s transparently clear what happened… ARC reviewers saw the Edge spike from the defenders hand hitting the padding and called it a behind - then later realised the ball had already passed the post by the time of the spike. Hence they refused to release the edge footage to Ch7
Sack everyone
It’s transparently clear what happened… ARC reviewers saw the Edge spike from the defenders hand hitting the padding and called it a behind - then later realised the ball had already passed the post by the time of the spike. Hence they refused to release the edge footage to Ch7
Sack everyone
Jazny
Brownlow Medallist
- Nov 2, 2014
- 21,255
- 39,450
- AFL Club
- Tasmania
- Other Teams
- #TeamTurboChooks
Oh dear
Their was no review performed goal ump called it a point are you saying they review it with him in the earpiece? Crows could sue the afl
TheCatStevensExperience
Footballl Oracle
- Jul 28, 2023
- 2,610
- 3,010
- AFL Club
- Geelong
- Other Teams
- BigBigSounders2023 Kansas City Chefs
Goal umpire was in the right position - don't think the field umpire would have had any reason to think they got it wrong.
Elmer_Hauser
Vote for Triggering Tiger FOTY 2024
When the player who kicked the ball is running around celebrating and its right at the end of the game. Review is called every time!
JoseMourinho
Not A Manager
If it wasn't called a goal the players celebrating would have every right to expect a review with such a close one at the end of the game, this is a complete farce. The quick call and play on cost them the game.
- Feb 12, 2017
- 18,823
- 49,830
- AFL Club
- Geelong
Lol. I thought BigFooty.com was overreacting but I just saw the footage. FARKIN LOL!
They say "all goals are reviewed" - does that mean umpire calls of behinds are not?
Any on Ch7 I thought they said they couldn't access the Edge recording, because they were told it showed the hand and ball hitting the padding at the same time - which is clearly bullshit
philreich
Premium Platinum
- Mar 2, 2014
- 63,290
- 161,702
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
I'll feel sorry for Crows flogs when you barrack for Collingwood.......
From memory they actually review every goal whether the umpires calls for them anyway. The fact they refused to give footage in the first place is the worrying part.
They say "all goals are reviewed" - does that mean umpire calls of behinds are not?
Any on Ch7 I thought they said they couldn't access the Edge recording, because they were told it showed the hand and ball hitting the padding at the same time - which is clearly bullshit
If only we somehow had footage of the Swans player hitting the padding well after the ball crosses the goal line
AFL's gonna have to pull a Gaddafi at this rate.
That's blatant cheating by the AFL. Shocking decision
Grand Uncle Horace
Shake down the thunder
Am enjoying the salt.
The Crom fans on the fence knew it was not a goal.
The Crom fans on the fence knew it was not a goal.
