- Jul 6, 2017
- 32,037
- 46,416
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
yeah I agree it would be harder to get away with a pagans paddock style set up - but if it was used sporadically and the threat being having players that can kick goals from outside 50 - ie rachele / dawson / Walker / seedsman if he comes back? - it would make the defence more accountable to having to go with their man rather than sweating off in a zone all the time - particularly if we then played through these guys if the defence did zone back on a goal square stationed ThilthorpeI agree that this approach could work, however does the modern game of zone defenses allow a Pagan's Paddock type setup? I think opposition coaches are pretty smart these days. We had a similar game plan in 2017 where we were blitzing teams on the counter-attack and were the highest scoring team in the comp. Back half of the season, opposition coaches implemented a plan to stop our scoring and it worked, stopping us in our tracks and making us look at alternative ways of moving the footy.
Whatever the game plan, RT should be using his aerobic capacity to out-work his defender and not try an out-muscle them and force one-on-one contests. I was so surprised to see in round one he had run so far in the game as he seemed to sit idle in the F50 asking for the ball to be lobbed on his head. I don't know how he clocked up so many kms when all he seemed to do was stand in the goal square!
Ahh just spitballing on how to get a set up that will provide maximum hurt factor for opposition to try and defend