Maybe they can say that in the appeal, but I don’t think they will appeal now unless they think they can get it down to 3.They tried the good bloke and pity me argument.
Should of said what he said first and left it.
"I saw the ball being punched out and ran towards where it was heading. In the process the ball was taken by Izak and in that split second of momentum I made a football act to bump with my shoulder to their body not hitting high or above the neck to get the ball. After seeing the ball go out and continued on to get the ball and do my job. Unfortunately, Izak was injured when hitting the ground. I never intended to injure Izak or any player for that matter. I do, however play the sport as it is intended physical and within the rules of which my bump was intended."
No apologising etc.. just that and leave it.