- Nov 6, 2014
- 64,567
- 82,271
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
What was Gibbs?Essendon hilariously paid two first rounders for Dylan Shiel. Jeremy Cameron was three first rounders.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
What was Gibbs?Essendon hilariously paid two first rounders for Dylan Shiel. Jeremy Cameron was three first rounders.
Is that confirmed that we are after pick 2?
We should take out deals inviting GC and Freo. They skew the data.Some of the bigger trades of the last 7 or 8 years (not include any steak knives picks beyond mid 30's)
Tim Taranto ->12 and 19
Josh Dunkley (plus change) -> 21 + F1 + F2
Jeremy Cameron (plus 2x F2) -> 13 + 15 +20
Tim Kelly (plus change) -> 14 + 24 + F1
Brad Hill (plus change) -> 10 + F2 + Acres
Wingard -> Burton + 15
Neale + 30 -> 6 + 19
Jesse Hogan (Melb to Freo) -> 6 + 23
Shiel + F2 -> 9 + F1
Lever + 35 -> 10 + F1
Gibbs + F2 -> 10 + 16 + F2
O'Meara (to Hawks) -> 10 + F2
You need to take into account the relative perceived strengths of the drafts in how picks are valued, but if we do manage to get a top 10 plus another first rounder for Houston that would be right up there with the biggest trades in recent history. Hence I think it's more realistic to expect a top 10 + F2 type deal.
Of those deals only Cameron I would rate above Houston.Some of the bigger trades of the last 7 or 8 years (not include any steak knives picks beyond mid 30's)
Tim Taranto ->12 and 19
Josh Dunkley (plus change) -> 21 + F1 + F2
Jeremy Cameron (plus 2x F2) -> 13 + 15 +20
Tim Kelly (plus change) -> 14 + 24 + F1
Brad Hill (plus change) -> 10 + F2 + Acres
Wingard -> Burton + 15
Neale + 30 -> 6 + 19
Jesse Hogan (Melb to Freo) -> 6 + 23
Shiel + F2 -> 9 + F1
Lever + 35 -> 10 + F1
Gibbs + F2 -> 10 + 16 + F2
O'Meara (to Hawks) -> 10 + F2
You need to take into account the relative perceived strengths of the drafts in how picks are valued, but if we do manage to get a top 10 plus another first rounder for Houston that would be right up there with the biggest trades in recent history. Hence I think it's more realistic to expect a top 10 + F2 type deal.
Lever Shiel about rightWe should take out deals inviting GC and Freo. They skew the data.
On SM-G975F using BigFooty.com mobile app
I like and if he doesn’t want to go to North, well. Carlton trade with North to get the picks, maybe McKay will go there lolIt's all very simple, we trade Houston to North for 2 and 22
Use those picks to draft Sid Draper and Alex Dodson from under the Camrys
Win-Win
The thing is, if he goes they will have to hand over essentially what we are asking because he is still under contract and a long one at that. If we don’t get what we are asking he stays.Looks like the bigger Vic clubs will end up being the ones putting forward a deal.
Can’t see them handing over what we should be getting.
Still believe he stays.
And nor should they. He has signed a contract and if he is desperate to get to Victoria then the best draft picks win, otherwise he stays put.He wants to get to a Victorian contender. Specifically, he wants to get to Carlton, where Vossy is doing an enormous amount of work to get him.
The sense I get is that Port aren't just going to roll over and give him away for a handful of magic beans.
Some of the bigger trades of the last 7 or 8 years (not include any steak knives picks beyond mid 30's)
Tim Taranto ->12 and 19
Josh Dunkley (plus change) -> 21 + F1 + F2
Jeremy Cameron (plus 2x F2) -> 13 + 15 +20
Tim Kelly (plus change) -> 14 + 24 + F1
Brad Hill (plus change) -> 10 + F2 + Acres
Wingard -> Burton + 15
Neale + 30 -> 6 + 19
Jesse Hogan (Melb to Freo) -> 6 + 23
Shiel + F2 -> 9 + F1
Lever + 35 -> 10 + F1
Gibbs + F2 -> 10 + 16 + F2
O'Meara (to Hawks) -> 10 + F2
You need to take into account the relative perceived strengths of the drafts in how picks are valued, but if we do manage to get a top 10 plus another first rounder for Houston that would be right up there with the biggest trades in recent history. Hence I think it's more realistic to expect a top 10 + F2 type deal.
Personally, I think that would be a fair return too. Pick 11 and their F1 next year with nothing else going back. It’s the minimum acceptable return for him. It only becomes tolerable for us if Perryman is coming our way, and if we can use the future first for someone like Lukosius.After last night, I’m more comfortable that pick 11 and a future first is not bad business. We would be losing a very good player but it is where we have the most depth.
The extra cap space for Perryman probably should be counted too.
After last night, I’m more comfortable that pick 11 and a future first is not bad business. We would be losing a very good player but it is where we have the most depth.
The extra cap space for Perryman probably should be counted too.
Agree with this. Disappointed in Houston wanting out for whatever the reason. His choice of club should have very low influence IMO in this case. We need to hold the whip very tight in this trade and make sure we get the best possible deal to land whoever we have our eye on. As I’ve said above, if Rozee has been in Lukosius’ ear and Lukosius is a target that our list manager and coaches want, then I expect us to make it happen. I don’t know how I feel about it properly but he’s a reasonable replacement for Marshall although less of an imposing target than even Todd has been. He has some other qualities though.If I were in the list management team, I'd be pushing Dan towards Dees. I'm not a fan of Carlton's pick 11 which will likely become 12 or 13 this year. And for all we know they could make a prelim next year and that F1 after NGA and F/S can again be around pick 17-20. That in my eyes is Unders for Dan. I'd absolutely be pushing for a top 8 picks plus a F1.
Demons were willing to offer that and even if they now pull back and offer pick 5 I'd take it along with 25 (which they should get for ANB) and another 2nd rounder (maybe future).
If not, push him towards Kangas for their F1. I would then split that into 2 mid to late first rounds.
Dealing with Carlton on this is dangerous and won't get us the best outcome. They already don't want to trade 11 which is delusional!
Agree with this. Disappointed in Houston wanting out for whatever the reason. His choice of club should have very low influence IMO in this case. We need to hold the whip very tight in this trade and make sure we get the best possible deal to land whoever we have our eye on. As I’ve said above, if Rozee has been in Lukosius’ ear and Lukosius is a target that our list manager and coaches want, then I expect us to make it happen. I don’t know how I feel about it properly but he’s a reasonable replacement for Marshall although less of an imposing target than even Todd has been. He has some other qualities though.
If we can turn Houston into a top 12 pick, Lukosius and also get Perryman, then that’s good business. If we can use Clurey to get the later draft pick to make sure we can get all of Rome Burgoyne, Barrett and Montgomery, and find someone else to land us Richards, then even better. Cumming would be the icing on the cake.