Mr Eagle
Bird-brain
Melbourne-GC contrast could be a lot better. Not awful, but not a nice clean distinction between clubs either.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Fair enough too with Monaco on at the momentThey probably weren't expecting anyone to actually watch the game, to be fair.
Yeah, Richmond have darkened their jumper and Essendon haven't lighten their jumper anywhere near enough so from the wide shot you've only got the shorts.On the telly both jumpers are dark, total dependence on the white shorts tonight.
They did a few years ago, but I'm not sure why it didn't continue.Surprised the umpires don't have anything special
SANFL Indigenous Round this weekend too. Usually it's not the same weekend as the AFL but with the referendum anniversary it makes sense.Our SANFL team have run out in the same design against North Adelaide today.
Edit: North are wearing this.
Sent from my SM-G955F using Tapatalk
Plenty of South supporters today shouting "In The Back" at every opportunity I reckon.There are three places a set of hands shouldn't be printed on a jumper. That is one of them
Probably.(would we do it with the Aus flag if we had a game on 26 Jan?)
Nope, I think that would be considered inappropriate and disrespectful - "diggers fought under that flag and you're trivializing it for playing footy" kind of thing.Have the AFL ever used different flags on Anzac Day?
This Pies jumper is without doubt a light jumper with dark shorts. And it looks brilliant.
They're definitely testing the waters this season it seems. Trying to find the right balance between black and white to avoid a North situation.Needs to be the 2018 home kit.
It's in the same font as "afl.com.au" was, and "LEST WE FORGET". I think it's the standard "writing under the logo" font. But agree on the '67. 67 what?Are any other grammar sticklers annoyed by the Celebrating 67 text on the ground? We're not remembering a random numeral, it should either be Celebrating '67 or Celebrating 1967.
Oh and it's in Impact for some weird reason.