- Jun 27, 2013
- 47,125
- 44,132
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
- Other Teams
- Tottenham Hotspur, SSC Napoli, ESH
- Thread starter
- #26
Dusty 49 at HT from 16 possies, lel, but 83 in SC
Just a Supercoacher these days
Just a Supercoacher these days
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ends up getting a 90 DT 139 SCDusty 49 at HT from 16 possies, lel, but 83 in SC
Just a Supercoacher these days
That SC score is way too high for him, barely noticed him in the second half! This is why I don't like playing SC, there are players that get massively KOTD based on their name alone. I can imagine it being a very frustrating game to play at times! Fantasy and RDT are frustrating enough because of some minor missed stats, but to see Dusty get a 140 for his game tonight would be an injustice (if I didn't own him of course).Ends up getting a 90 DT 139 SC
I've melted a fair few times about KOTD/robbed over there this year, did so 3 times last weekend over Gawn getting robbed then Parker and Dawson Simpson getting mega KOTD.That SC score is way too high for him, barely noticed him in the second half! This is why I don't like playing SC, there are players that get massively KOTD based on their name alone. I can imagine it being a very frustrating game to play at times! Fantasy and RDT are frustrating enough because of some minor missed stats, but to see Dusty get a 140 for his game tonight would be an injustice (if I didn't own him of course).
I've melted a fair few times about KOTD/robbed over there this year, did so 3 times last weekend over Gawn getting robbed then Parker and Dawson Simpson getting mega KOTD.
Have melted about it randomly over my Bigfooty years, but this year at least more people see that games scoring is massively flawed. Prefer the old days of Supercoach really, no KOTD hitouts to advantage, just standard 1 point a hitout like DT, full lockout every Friday night like DT, players only getting KOTD kicking goals late in tight games, was great to see post game scaling applied. These days there's minimal to no scaling done, all done at random during the game so CD doesn't go over their 3300 point accumulator threshold which is the worst part of that game imo. High quality games should have well over 3300 points awarded, low quality games with low scoring/low possession numbers well under 3300 points awarded. Instead they are all valued the same overall because of that silly formula they use.
Not even close to 140 you idiot... your parents should take your computer off you until games finish bradley
Not there a relevant players but check out the NEAFL dream team points in a sloppy match:
View attachment 530247
Lol, thinking maybe I should've played Mihocek over Savage.Seems crazy that Mihocek is more of a D6 right now than Crisp and Seedsman and he was my throw away D8
23 tackles for Dawson, lolNot there a relevant players but check out the NEAFL dream team points in a sloppy match:
View attachment 530247
Same story with Phillips. So frustrating owning very outside mids, can go 140 one week and then 70-80 the next. Phillips has literally only had one good quarter per game since I got him in which means he only just crawls to 100 in his good gamesCollingwood are killing North and Crisp can't get anywhere near it.
Only said I preferred the old system when it seemed the 3300 accumulator never came into play and we always got postmatch scaling, now scaling occurs randomly during the game and the tally at the final siren is always around the 3300 markGood ruck work and game influence is more than just hitout and possessions numbers. Hence why the best 2 (Gawn & Grundy) SC averages are higher than their DT/AF averages.
Going to be some underpriced mids next yearIf anyone has the balls, it looks like Adams is finally fit enough. Though his second halves have been poor lately, the signs are very good, especially with his tackle numbers starting to improve.