Round 8 discussion

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Pea Nut said:
Ebert out was always going to mean a senior player had to play forward. I changed my trades to bring in Dunkley instead of Hoff when I thought more about it.
Click to expand...
You're absolutely killing your trade ins at least even though your midpricers hurt you the first few weeks

I had no chance against your PODs the other week

Dunkley over Westhoff a masterstroke this week

Yeah hopefully that was the case with Ebert, but surely why didn't Rockliff play down there instead? Ebert and Rockliff are similar body types being stocky medium sized mids, Westhoff is a skinny mobile tall.
 
go you pups said:
You're absolutely killing your trade ins at least even though your midpricers hurt you the first few weeks

I had no chance against your PODs the other week

Dunkley over Westhoff a masterstroke this week

Yeah hopefully that was the case with Ebert, but surely why didn't Rockliff play down there instead? Ebert and Rockliff are similar body types being stocky medium sized mids, Westhoff is a skinny mobile tall.
Click to expand...
It's Hinkley. Who would know.

I thought my mid price picks were great and were working out well until they got injured. Two years in a row now I've been burnt by performing mid pricers getting injured. Annoying.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Why do these two idiots (no names needed) continue to make stupid comments/predictions before each game, at 1/4 time, at half time yet after their predictions turn out to be the opposite of what they said, there is no “I got that wrong” or similar. Just more of the same for the next match.
There must be something dramatically wrong with them and/or their life.
 
10-15 more minutes or so before these teams drop and puts us out of our misery

Bandicoot said:
Why do these two idiots (no names needed) continue to make stupid comments/predictions before each game, at 1/4 time, at half time yet after their predictions turn out to be the opposite of what they said, there is no “I got that wrong” or similar. Just more of the same for the next match.
Click to expand...
I've probably been guilty of it too, yet I've tried to hold back until say midway through the third quarter

Got lucky on Witherden having a big last quarter, but Westhoff and Newnes just ruined the weekend (similarly to Cogs and Brayshaw last week)
There must be something dramatically wrong with them and/or their life.
Click to expand...
I'd probably cut it here mate

Maybe they're more pessimistic than others, who knows, no need though on playing the man here
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

iwilldestroyoyu said:
Breakeven of 25. If he hits his predicted score of 87 goes up 35k and a breakeven of 31 next week.
Click to expand...
Yeah I was very skeptical moving him on early for this reason

I guess he playing is the best result for my side for next weeks trades though

If there's no rookies around then I could maybe squeeze a double upgrade in if I trade say Constable/Drew to a Dunkley + premo defender






My loophole for this weekend is probably stuffed though now, lol, what a giant **** up this Westhoff trade/Danger contingency plan was, probably will cost me 150-200 points not going Treloar when all said and done...

IMG_20190512_122948.png IMG_20190512_122932.png


Basically now

Captain Coniglio (who knows what he throws up), field Constable, bench Ross

Loophole Zerrett through Scott, take Hayes' 64, bench both Constable and Ross. Ross will be Cogs' backup if he's a late out
 
iwilldestroyoyu said:
Breakeven of 25. If he hits his predicted score of 87 goes up 35k and a breakeven of 31 next week.
Click to expand...

Amazing result...just needs to score a 70...hopefully Ablett gets a rest next week so he stays in. Atkins and miers could also be due for a rest. Just need 2-3 more weeks of constable and he will be ripe to upgrade to a top 6
 
Zerrett 272 + Hayes 64 = 336

If Constable scores 86 which is his average, do we think Cogs goes 125+? This would also be 336+

Maybe should just take Zerrett looking at it like this :(

Not going to pull the trigger for another 20 minutes though, still think Geelong might play funny buggers with Danger/Gazza
 
Bradkli said:
Amazing result...just needs to score a 70...hopefully Ablett gets a rest next week so he stays in. Atkins and miers could also be due for a rest. Just need 2-3 more weeks of constable and he will be ripe to upgrade to a top 6
Click to expand...

Miers looks so fresh.
Playing real high hf and pushing into the mids.
Doesn't look like wanting a rest.
 
go you pups said:
Constable

Tiges playing Freo over there, Fyfe and Mundy should bully them. Ross probably scores 70 odd

Constable could go anything really, imo he has 110-120s in him
Click to expand...

Yeah I am going to run the risk and play Constable over Ross. Had Gibbons 76 and was going to take that and leave Constable onfield but now hes playing you would think he is fired up to stay in the team so could go 100. Anyway just him playing and making more $$ is a bonus so glad I held hes been traded pretty heavily so be good if he can hold his spot for a few more weeks and get to his bye. He can score well as we have seen see how he goes today
 
go you pups said:
Zerrett 272 + Hayes 64 = 336

If Constable scores 86 which is his average, do we think Cogs goes 125+? This would also be 336+

Maybe should just take Zerrett looking at it like this :(

Not going to pull the trigger for another 20 minutes though, still think Geelong might play funny buggers with Danger/Gazza
Click to expand...
Cogs isn't scoring 125+ with a broken hand.
If you have Zerrett VC surely you have to take it.
 
go you pups said:
Zerrett 272 + Hayes 64 = 336

If Constable scores 86 which is his average, do we think Cogs goes 125+? This would also be 336+

Maybe should just take Zerrett looking at it like this :(

Not going to pull the trigger for another 20 minutes though, still think Geelong might play funny buggers with Danger/Gazza
Click to expand...
Take Zerrett as C everyday! Cogs hasn't looked like himself for a few weeks now, just cannot risk another disaster score as C.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Similar threads

fightingfury_88
AFLTM Round 8 Teams
2
Replies
28
Views
1K
fightingfury_88
fightingfury_88
fightingfury_88
  • Sticky
  • Poll
2024/25 AFLTM Off-Season Discussion
2
Replies
46
Views
2K
Hatchy1992
Hatchy1992
fightingfury_88
2023 AFLTM Round 8 Teams
2
Replies
30
Views
1K
Pie 4 Life
Pie 4 Life
fightingfury_88
AFLTM Round 19 Teams
Replies
21
Views
879
sante
sante
fightingfury_88
AFLTM Round 18 Teams
Replies
17
Views
852
fightingfury_88
fightingfury_88
fightingfury_88
AFLTM Round 17 Teams
Replies
22
Views
756
hotchilli
hotchilli
fightingfury_88
AFLTM Round 16 Teams
Replies
17
Views
807
fightingfury_88
fightingfury_88

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top