Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Highly likely he'll do time for this.
BTW the title of this thread is TOTALLY inappropriate. "Pest"?
Term probably gets used at times to avoid any legal ramifications - it is a lot less defined than calling someone a rapist.Highly likely he'll do time for this.
BTW the title of this thread is TOTALLY inappropriate. "Pest"?
I think there will be a lot more people coming forward from now.
Check his Youtube comments. It's ridiculous.There's a lot of cookers of Brand's twitter feed.
other news reports of celebrities dating 16 year olds in England are coming out at leastMight be like the Harvey Weinstein situation, once the first brave ones come out then flood gates will open
Harvey Weinstein sexual abuse cases - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
other news reports of celebrities dating 16 year olds in England are coming out at least
Noel Fielding is copping some real heat, was a friend of Brands 20 years ago and seems to have largely acted the same at least at the time
Highly likely he'll do time for this.
BTW the title of this thread is TOTALLY inappropriate. "Pest"?
Sex pest definition is sexual assault if you look it up, it doesn't mean annoying.Very much undersells the seriousness of the accusations.
I don't think anyone doubts he's a sex pest, he's well and truly admitted that over the years. He's now an accused abuser.
is this really worth arguing about?
Labelling men who are predators as freaks is pretending that they aren't normal men, it's like when someone commits dv or sa and they get called a monster.Can you stop replying agressively to me . There is nothing wrong with my opinion here. If you want to have a go at me explain what you mean.
There has been a misunderstanding here. I was calling the internet warriors on Brand's twitter feed freaks. The qanon conspiracy theorist types who support Brand 100% no matter what evidence is presented.Labelling men who are predators as freaks is pretending that they aren't normal men, it's like when someone commits dv or sa and they get called a monster.
It's dehumanising language to other them and an excuse suggest their actions are an unnatural fault with them.
My experience is that they're just people, they're violent because they can be, they usually have a very misogynistic unhealthy view of women as well as a very strong sense of entitlement.
They're owed what they want and justified in getting it by any means necessary.
This attitude isn't just limited to people that commit sexual assault, facing that is harder than calling them freaks or monsters though regardless of how terrible their actions are
There has been a misunderstanding here. I was calling the internet warriors on Brand's twitter feed freaks. The qanon conspiracy theorist types who support Brand 100% no matter what evidence is presented.
If you look at what I replying to it was the Russell Brand devotees.
It's cultish behaviour that somehow has become a norm on the internet in the last 10 years.It's a bizarre reality where those who protest they're free thinkers that do their own research and are looking for things to uncover, who are presented with actual information of someone doing terrible things, immediately dismiss it as 'fake news' because it's something on 'their' side.
Good idea to post comments stating as much, IMO.Unbelievable. They need to do a study on these freaks.
again you're just dismissing them without thinking why they are supporting himThere has been a misunderstanding here. I was calling the internet warriors on Brand's twitter feed freaks. The qanon conspiracy theorist types who support Brand 100% no matter what evidence is presented.
If you look at what I replying to it was the Russell Brand devotees.
It's not a term I would use as it diminishes the behaviour, like that article calling him a "Lothario". He's a (alleged) rapist.Sex pest definition is sexual assault if you look it up, it doesn't mean annoying.
Why are they supporting him in your opinion?again you're just dismissing them without thinking why they are supporting him