bigfishtrain
Debutant
- Aug 30, 2005
- 69
- 0
- Other Teams
- Roosters
Nick Smith is a gun.... full stop
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Flying Joey said:whos stengline?? that a new type of fishing rod?? and both those players would not be in the top 100 players in the afl..
I believe that he plays for the west coast eagles and may have even played for the crows....and they are probably the best two taggers in the modern game and both would easly be in the top 100 players in the AFL...wat gives u the impression that sum1 like baker or stengline wouldn't be in the the top 100 players???
straylan said:I think Cail you are judging him harshly from our first encounter in the wet. You pointed out a number of flaws in his game after that and i watched him closely for them and i found the biggest problem in his game is when he gets the ball he runs at a tackler and trys to fend off (which he almost always does) rather than looking for space and giving the hands off first give. Not trying to be critical Cail, but i think you probably need to see a bit more of him, watching closely at his style of game, you have analysed his game pretty well but i think you have exagerated some of his pluses and minus'
Also interested in your views Colin Custard and maybe even Rossi Boys if you are online...
tom722 said:This little discussion leads to a good question:
If you were given the option to pick up Nick Smith or Jed Kenny for your schoolboy football team in 2006, who would you choose...
I would like unbias decisions here with reasons
keeper of light said:they both play for sturt dont they? so they play the same brand of footy. it would b a hard decision but id have to say smith because of his ability to find the footy. kenny doesnt get the ball as much and needs to improve in that area of his game. smith also has a big engine...
keeper of light said:get over it, wat do u want me to do... physically disect their games with 10 dot points each for their strengths and weaknesses. which one has the better smelling deoderant. whos car is better. i say they do more development out at sturt, they have around 10 games a yr with them through holidays, compared to schools 14 odd... not including the trial games at the start of the yr for sturt. plus they have around 3 months solid preseason at the start of the yr for 6 days a week. so thats where they get their style of football from. how dare u say i dont know wat im talking about! u saint lads have a lot of growing up to do
keeper of light said:yeh fair call i spose. spose i did hop on the deffensive a little early but yeh, back to shc b and f, we all know the top 5-ish for this yr but wat do u reckon about next yr. obviously button and day will poll very highly but wat about the smokeys like, tom fosdike who played no games in 1sts this yr due to injury, jack fosdike, tom mayfield, tom stevenson, mitch ryan... could b extremely close... thoughts??? or dus this belong in a new thread?
straylan said:I think Button is a real chance to make state 18s next year, but im not too sure about Daysie. He may get close but in the final team? i doubt that. Jack is way better than Matt by the way
Day to clean up B & F next year
The Mole said:matt is better than jack, thats y he made the shortlist for the u/16 state and also made the firsts squad without any preseason... ull eat those words come next november
True, jack was inelegible.straylan said:Maybe because Jack in inelegible...
Im talking about right now; Jack is a better player. Did i say Jack had more ability?