In 1998 the Crows won a flag by using exotic experimental drugs. Hence the point. That you are a hypocrite
Wat?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 8 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
In 1998 the Crows won a flag by using exotic experimental drugs. Hence the point. That you are a hypocrite
Bunk says it's not an appeal and some boso says it's double jeopardy or something?you know that CAS is just an appeal right? And that the reason for the appeal is that the players were found not guilty of an adrv right?
You are, quite simply, nothing more than a hypocritical pitchfork waver, but hey, you're not alone.
Thats called the "Mum, they are picking on me" defence.Wow...
the point is that you're a hypocrite. Because you heap abuse on Essendon for experimenting with drugs whilst trying desperately to somehow find a way to pretend your team didn't do exactly the same thing. Who cares if WADA didn't exist. Your team did whatever it took to win that flag.How am I a hypocrit? WADA did not exist in 1998 so we were not breaking rules and secondly the substance wasn't an exotic drug at all, it was a natural supplement, unlike the prescribed concoctions your mob were given. It wasn't banned then, and isn't banned now. So what the **** is your point?
article posted a few pages backWat?
so?Bunk says it's not an appeal and some boso says it's double jeopardy or something?
MilkPardon my ignorance, what was it?
So do we all accept Mark Evans' assertion that "people need to respect the position of the Essendon players"?
Firstborn calfs milk ?Milk
Thanks.........what was it, A1 or A2, don't want the upset tummy you know?Milk
You need a bex ,Lance getting a bit stressedthe point is that you're a hypocrite. Because you heap abuse on Essendon for experimenting with drugs whilst trying desperately to somehow find a way to pretend your team didn't do exactly the same thing. Who cares if WADA didn't exist. Your team did whatever it took to win that flag.
Thanks.........what was it, A1 or A2, don't want the upset tummy you know?
Eat carpet?Egg on my face? What did I do?
Not when a keyboard and anonymity is involved.
That won't go unseen or unhird will it!How about the crowd mimicking Mitchell at the next Essendon game?
Don't agreeso?
It is an appeal. That is a simple statement of fact
Don't agree
Different prosecutor. Starting from scratch. I actually don't mind the double jeopardy argument except it's too lofty for this kind of thingso?
It is an appeal. That is a simple statement of fact
How about the crowd mimicking Mitchell at the next Essendon game?
It's some weird not quite appeal...is that good enough an answer? The tribunal decision counts for nothing re CASWhat is it then
Love for one of them to get in front of someone who actually knows to about the facts and watch how fast they get shut down. It's easy to do when you don't have to answer for your actions.
But it's all banter and I'm not too fussed. I am sure there's been a mass of jibes about it for the last 3 years, only just caught on TV this time.
Love for one of them to get in front of someone who actually knows to about the facts and watch how fast they get shut down. It's easy to do when you don't have to answer for your actions.
But it's all banter and I'm not too fussed. I am sure there's been a mass of jibes about it for the last 3 years, only just caught on TV this time.
That's just it, nobody knows the facts so the public assumes Essendon's guilt after they warned off Dank, Charter etc instead of compelling them to testify.
Guess there's no room left under the AFL's rug.