Nah it was after David King went on a tiradeJust the usual AFL corruption at play. Changed from 3 to 4 games after they realised we were playing Geelong in the 4th game.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Sydney v Port Adelaide - 7:40 / 7:10 Fri
Squiggle tips Swans at 57% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
LIVE: Geelong v Brisbane Lions - 7:30PM Sat
Squiggle tips Cats at 54% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Prelim Finals
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Nah it was after David King went on a tiradeJust the usual AFL corruption at play. Changed from 3 to 4 games after they realised we were playing Geelong in the 4th game.
Rucci saying that the Afl indicated to us yesterday morning that they would ask for three games. Changed their minds at the last minute to 4 games and blindsided us.
fu** heads.
FMD this guy is supposed to be a leading AFL journo and works for the AFL. The way the ****in rules are written, is the reason why there was no challenge.Damo Barrett on AFL Daily: Three should have been enough, no reason not to challenge
Disappointed we didn’t want to appeal. We really need Lycett for the geelong game. Now just hope Hayes or Ladhams could step up.
My hatred for them burns inside. I can't post here often because of it. There's nobody on this planet that hates the Crows more than I do. I get sadistic love seeing them suffer. I'm burying my crows mates right now as we speak. They can f off.I see them as the bastard child - we f’ed their mum (SANFL).
FMD this guy is supposed to be a leading AFL journo and works for the AFL. The way the fu**in rules are written, is the reason why there was no challenge.
(E) AN APPEAL OF A DECISION OF THE TRIBUNAL
A Player or the AFL General Counsel may appeal the decision of the
Tribunal to the Appeal Board on one or more of the following grounds:
» An error of law has occurred;
» The decision of the Tribunal is so unreasonable that no Tribunal acting reasonably
could have come to that decision having regard to the evidence before it;
» The classification of the offence by the Tribunal was manifestly
excessive or inadequate; or
» The sanction imposed by the Tribunal was manifestly excessive
or inadequate.
1 weeks difference isn't manifestly excessive.
You have to have the correct reason to challenge, just like you do in a normal court, to be allowed to have the appeal heard.I think what he was meaning was that it was a free hit - ie Slyce wouldnt get more weeks by us challenging
Yep I get what youre saying. I just think the way Damo was saying it was quite flippant ie what do they have lose by having a lookYou have to have the correct reason to challenge, just like you do in a normal court, to be allowed to have the appeal heard.
My hatred for them burns inside. I can't post here often because of it. There's nobody on this planet that hates the Crows more than I do. I get sadistic love seeing them suffer. I'm burying my crows mates right now as we speak. They can f off.
Na, I’ve only been to 3 showdowns since 1997, I always give my tickets away cause they make me sick to my stomach. Hate isn’t the word to describe my feel towards that team born out of a Petri dish.
Good way of looking at it. Makes it easier to cop when you see deliberate off the ball hits getting the same number.That said, I don't think any tackle where you're tackling the player with the ball should be worth 4 weeks. He didn't snipe anyone, he didn't run past the ball to bump, it wasn't off the ball. He tackled him too hard and deserved 2-3, but 4 is too many given what comparative high bumps get.
Yet those Crows flogs ringing Fiveaa complaining that Lycett never apologised..
Yet those Crows flogs ringing Fiveaa complaining that Lycett never apologised..
It wouldn’t be the aftermath of a Showdown if Crows supporters didn’t have a “Port people are evil” moral grandstand to sit in.
Remember when Josh Jenkins heard some bad language, Graeme Goodings heard some booing and a mob of Karens from Gawler to Noarlunga Downs felt Robbie immediately taking his Showdown Medal off as a member of the defeated side was anything from bad sportsmanship to wanting AIDS to break the shackles of the cocktail and take down Magic Johnson?
I've never seen anything in a Showdown as deplorable as Schulz getting booed off the ground after getting a finger in his eye.
Whilst they're great at pearl clutching, they're also as vicious and spiteful as a mob can be when they feel like they have any kind of upper hand.
I think the Eagles would rival them if they had more interesting competition, but Freo are too pathetic to inspire much hate.I mean I know rivalries can narrow vision but I'm struggling to think of a supporter base with more irrational venomous weirdos as the Crows.
Reminder that Jay Schulz almost lost an eye and the Crows crows booed the sh*t out of him when he was in the ground covering his eye.
To this day a lot of those numpties on that board still defend that booing.