Resource Season 38 Rules and Tribunal Thread

[serial_thrilla]

you clearly weren't the rules police last season. Hey big_icky

I'm not quite sure why you're tagging a banned poster.

 

[AnUltimateRessie]

I'm not quite sure why you're tagging a banned poster.

THEY'RE WHAT?

 

[serial_thrilla]

THEY'RE WHAT?

Oh boy, do you have egg on your face right now!

 

[dogs105]

you clearly weren't the rules police last season. Hey big_icky

Big_icky wasn't named in their original squad was he? Because it sounds like that would violate the law serial_thrilla just quoted???

 

[AnUltimateRessie]

Big_icky wasn't named in their original squad was he? Because it sounds like that would violate the law serial_thrilla just quoted???

big_icky was named in the dragons squad in s37 and s36 and was a clear violation of the valid player rule !

 

[Cadsky]

its clear no one cares for retrospective punishment

 

[dogs105]

big_icky was named in the dragons squad in s37 and s36 and was a clear violation of the valid player rule !

Far out. What was the penalty for that?

 

[dogs105]

its clear no one cares for retrospective punishment

The Filth Wizard does!!

 

[Tonga Bob]

I thought Facebook was for old people?

Tonga Bob you're up!

Yes. It's only 8:22pm.

 

[Tonga Bob]

That's cool and all but is the player signed up correctly and eligible to be played this week? Or do they need to go through the sign up process now? Genuine question

gotta follow the rules and go through the sign up process

OK guess I'll answer this then.

This has happened previously during my captaincy, and in every other occasion there was no requirement for the rookie to go through the in-season sign up process. The requirement was however that the rookie could not be named in a teamsheet to play a match until they had posted in the forum, specifically in their team's thread. Unless there has been a specific change to the rules that says that this is no longer the case and that rookies (which we as a league are apparently struggling to recruit) need to also go through the in-season sign up process then the fact that the rookie in question has not only posted in our team thread but five times within the first day of the first match thread should be sufficient to count them as an active and legitimate player.

I await the wisdom of Solomon to deliberate upon this hastily-coupled farce.

And strip his beez.

I believe I deserve another two of them for putting up with this horse hockey. And a Frankston Rover Award, I don't have one of those yet.

 

[AnUltimateRessie]

OK guess I'll answer this then.

This has happened previously during my captaincy, and in every other occasion there was no requirement for the rookie to go through the in-season sign up process. The requirement was however that the rookie could not be named in a teamsheet to play a match until they had posted in the forum, specifically in their team's thread. Unless there has been a specific change to the rules that says that this is no longer the case and that rookies (which we as a league are apparently struggling to recruit) need to also go through the in-season sign up process then the fact that the rookie in question has not only posted in our team thread but five times within the first day of the first match thread should be sufficient to count them as an active and legitimate player.

I await the wisdom of Solomon to deliberate upon this hastily-coupled farce.


I believe I deserve another two of them for putting up with this horse hockey. And a Frankston Rover Award, I don't have one of those yet.

i dont actually care

 

[Tonga Bob]

i dont actually care

I've always said that about you.

 

[AnUltimateRessie]

I've always said that about you.

I appreciate that

 

[Tonga Bob]

I appreciate that

And I appreciate you.

 

[The Filth Wizard]

OK guess I'll answer this then.

This has happened previously during my captaincy, and in every other occasion there was no requirement for the rookie to go through the in-season sign up process. The requirement was however that the rookie could not be named in a teamsheet to play a match until they had posted in the forum, specifically in their team's thread. Unless there has been a specific change to the rules that says that this is no longer the case and that rookies (which we as a league are apparently struggling to recruit) need to also go through the in-season sign up process then the fact that the rookie in question has not only posted in our team thread but five times within the first day of the first match thread should be sufficient to count them as an active and legitimate player.

I await the wisdom of Solomon to deliberate upon this hastily-coupled farce.


I believe I deserve another two of them for putting up with this horse hockey. And a Frankston Rover Award, I don't have one of those yet.

I believe the precedent, as Tongan Robert recollects, is the player remains on the list. The punishment has been served and the player has posted (not long after the deadline). The commonsense play would always be to move on but I’m open to anybody in the committee bringing it up. I just don’t know why we’d waste anybody’s time going through so many moves to get where we are now.

 

[Cadsky]

OK guess I'll answer this then.

This has happened previously during my captaincy, and in every other occasion there was no requirement for the rookie to go through the in-season sign up process. The requirement was however that the rookie could not be named in a teamsheet to play a match until they had posted in the forum, specifically in their team's thread. Unless there has been a specific change to the rules that says that this is no longer the case and that rookies (which we as a league are apparently struggling to recruit) need to also go through the in-season sign up process then the fact that the rookie in question has not only posted in our team thread but five times within the first day of the first match thread should be sufficient to count them as an active and legitimate player.

I await the wisdom of Solomon to deliberate upon this hastily-coupled farce.


I believe I deserve another two of them for putting up with this horse hockey. And a Frankston Rover Award, I don't have one of those yet.

yes i recall that happening and it makes sense, however its not covered in the rules anywhere.

 

[The Filth Wizard]

Oh wait sorry I interrupted that moment Bob and Res.

 

[dogs105]

I believe the precedent, as Tongan Robert recollects, is the player remains on the list. The punishment has been served and the player has posted (not long after the deadline). The commonsense play would always be to move on but I’m open to anybody in the committee bringing it up. I just don’t know why we’d waste anybody’s time going through so many moves to get where we are now.

This is the sort of no-nonsense approach we've been screaming out for. We'll done The Filth Wizard

 

[Gralin]

This is the sort of no-nonsense approach weve been screaming out for. We'll done The Filth Wizard

I like the cut of his jib

 

[Dingster]

Oh wait sorry I interrupted that moment Bob and Res.

Your first positive contribution as Admin.

 

[Tonga Bob]

I believe the precedent, as Tongan Robert recollects, is the player remains on the list. The punishment has been served and the player has posted (not long after the deadline). The commonsense play would always be to move on but I’m open to anybody in the committee bringing it up. I just don’t know why we’d waste anybody’s time going through so many moves to get where we are now.

 

[The Filth Wizard]

View attachment 2056987

Just tell everyone I called this would happen.

 

[serial_thrilla]

OK guess I'll answer this then.

This has happened previously during my captaincy, and in every other occasion there was no requirement for the rookie to go through the in-season sign up process. The requirement was however that the rookie could not be named in a teamsheet to play a match until they had posted in the forum, specifically in their team's thread. Unless there has been a specific change to the rules that says that this is no longer the case and that rookies (which we as a league are apparently struggling to recruit) need to also go through the in-season sign up process then the fact that the rookie in question has not only posted in our team thread but five times within the first day of the first match thread should be sufficient to count them as an active and legitimate player.

I await the wisdom of Solomon to deliberate upon this hastily-coupled farce.


I believe I deserve another two of them for putting up with this horse hockey. And a Frankston Rover Award, I don't have one of those yet.

Correct. There is precedent for that last season.
Play on.

 

[TheInjuryFactory]

its clear no one cares for retrospective punishment

What has this league come to.

 

[Braklet]

I honestly hoped that I wouldn't have to be league police again this season. This is a one-off, because squad submission is such a joyful time of the year.

The lady doth protest too much, methinks.