![](https://images.bigfootymedia.com/icons/mobile-bullets/richmond.png)
At this rate we'll be struggling to even pay the minimum cap so I'd say we'd tip in whatever is required.How many years would Tigers pay for with 2 top 10 picks
It would have to be atleast a couple
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: GWS Giants v Brisbane Lions - 7:30PM Sat
Squiggle tips Lions at 65% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
AFLW 2024 - Round 3 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
At this rate we'll be struggling to even pay the minimum cap so I'd say we'd tip in whatever is required.How many years would Tigers pay for with 2 top 10 picks
It would have to be atleast a couple
Only if Hawks lose tomorrow.I haven't looked at the ladder after today. Does 1 win get us in?
Its an interesting one, I dont know. Its well overs so we would certainly need to pay a bit but it wouldnt be 2 years of full wage.How many years would Tigers pay for with 2 top 10 picks
It would have to be atleast a couple
Have ya mate?I have been to quite a few Tigers games this year and I think that is overrating his value. He does a lot of things that look spectacular but most of them don't work out. His actual output isn't all that impressive.
And its only going to be an even bigger winner after today !This potential trade was the real winner tonight![]()
Its an interesting one, I dont know. Its well overs so we would certainly need to pay a bit but it wouldnt be 2 years of full wage.
If it was 3-4 years. I would imagine we would front load the majority of the contribution into the first 2 yearsI would assume it would be something like 200-300k for 4 years (end of current contract) or something. Basically what the Pies are still doing for Grundy. Significant, but we'd still be paying the bulk.
Yeah and we probably pay a decent chunk next year and majority of it in 2026 once Lynch contract expires and be done with our liability.I would assume it would be something like 200-300k for 4 years (end of current contract) or something. Basically what the Pies are still doing for Grundy. Significant, but we'd still be paying the bulk.
If it was 3-4 years. I would imagine we would front load the majority of the contribution into the first 2 years
Don't think they can't pay the full wage.
I'm not sure where I got this from (old memory?), but I think the AFL has a rule that you can't pay too much (half?) to ensure the salary cap isn't totally bypassed this way.
IIRC, they didn't want clubs losing players to be able to pay anything (integrity of the salary cap, etc etc), but it was forced on the by the AFLPA to make player movement easier.
Although maybe they changed that when they altered the rules to allow 'salary dump' trades a couple of years back....
As you can probably tell, I'm not sure about this, but I think I'm right.
First time you've come second I heard.
campaigners coming onto Big Footy to post facts ffsFirst time you've come second I heard.
Facts on BF, very rarecampaigners coming onto Big Footy to post facts ffs![]()
I hope soThe Freo small forwards lack class, pace and X factor
Mids are all the same as well, one paced.
Shai would walk into this team and be their most important player from day 1
I hope so
Is Bolton classy?The Freo small forwards lack class, pace and X factor
Mids are all the same as well, one paced.
Shai would walk into this team and be their most important player from day 1
Something like 8/16/25 for Bolton and Baker with no salary paid.
Still overs for Shai but not a complete roasting
You won't simultaneously get maximum value for Bolton and get maximum value for Baker. Because if you leverage the contract on one, you lose it on the other.Couldn't see us even considering Shai for 8/25 (not saying its not the right value). We will get similar to that for Rioli. Then with Baker leaving as well, there surely isn't a need for more picks in that range unless way overs was offered. With the others all leaving, wed be better off holding for 12 months and trying to get picks in next seasons draft if he still wants out.
8 + 16 + 25 for Bolton and BakerCouldn't see us even considering Shai for 8/25 (not saying its not the right value). We will get similar to that for Rioli. Then with Baker leaving as well, there surely isn't a need for more picks in that range unless way overs was offered. With the others all leaving, wed be better off holding for 12 months and trying to get picks in next seasons draft if he still wants out.
You won't simultaneously get maximum value for Bolton and get maximum value for Baker. from us Because if you leverage the contract on one, you lose it on the other.
So the 8+16 is for Bolton, the 25 is for Baker in that scenario.