and what do you base that on?I'm not in position to say what exactly is it they need, maybe some of the more learned posters can clarify this, but I'd suggest they have more than enough on your club.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
and what do you base that on?I'm not in position to say what exactly is it they need, maybe some of the more learned posters can clarify this, but I'd suggest they have more than enough on your club.
I'm "overwhelmingly" confident there won't be any evidence presented that incriminates Essendon playersJust so you know, people can be convicted in criminal trials on circumstantial evidence alone. Collect enough of it, and it can be all that's needed to dispel any reasonable doubt.
On all the circumstantial evidence available to us, unlike you who is basing your stance on sfa and hopeand what do you base that on?
I am not one to blindly berate the media, but I am also not one to consider media reports as "evidence"On all the circumstantial evidence available to us, unlike you who is basing your stance on sfa and hope
There's a woman in a Tasmanian prison convicted of murdering her husband based entirely on circumstantial evidence. Quite a startling case actually.Just so you know, people can be convicted in criminal trials on circumstantial evidence alone. Collect enough of it, and it can be all that's needed to dispel any reasonable doubt.
There's a woman in a Tasmanian prison convicted of murdering her husband based entirely on circumstantial evidence. Quite a startling case actually.
Fair enough but I clearly recall you stating "this doesn't look good" few times during this saga upon hearing something regarding this subject in the same media you're doubting. And thats not even asking for an honest answer how many times you thought this but refrained from showing it on this boardI am not one to blindly berate the media, but I am also not one to consider media reports as "evidence"
I am not immune from being affected by it. And it doesn't look good. Even the best case scenario isn't really flash.Fair enough but I clearly recall you stating "this doesn't look good" few times during this saga upon hearing something regarding this subject in the same media you're doubting. And thats not even asking for an honest answer how many times you thought this but refrained from showing it on this board
I am not immune from being affected by it. And it doesn't look good. Even the best case scenario isn't really flash.
30 players from 6 clubs were on his books back in 03 according to this article so not sure how relevant it is to the current situation.I wonder if it's just a coincidence that he "has 30 players from 6 clubs" on his books, and that Dank ordered enough Thymosin for 30 players.
I guess they are just round numbers
30 players from 6 clubs were on his books back in 03 according to this article so not sure how relevant it is to the current situation.
http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/a...urtain-20130419-2i5io.html?rand=1366380671966
30 players from 6 clubs were on his books back in 03 according to this article so not sure how relevant it is to the current situation.
http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/a...urtain-20130419-2i5io.html?rand=1366380671966
You are overwhelmingly delusional.I'm "overwhelmingly" confident there won't be any evidence presented that incriminates Essendon players
Given the comment was about charters interview and he stated he didnt believe his comments would incriminate Essendon players I think youre wrongYou are overwhelmingly delusional.
Given the comment was about charters interview and he stated he didnt believe his comments would incriminate Essendon players I think youre wrong
All they need is for Kyle Reimers to talk, but it seems like the AFL have slapped a gag on him.they need more than circumstantial though
According to what Dank claimed Hird took in 2012, Hird may have been all 30 players himself back then.I've been enjoying Lance's latching onto the 30 players from 6 clubs argument , as though it's currently relevant.
Charter's mention of those numbers on 4 Corners was clearly a historical reference.
How can they not interview Reimers?All they need is for Kyle Reimers to talk, but it seems like the AFL have slapped a gag on him.
They just need to put together a case, they don't need positive tests. Think Lane Armstrong. It won't be one golden bullet that takes them down it will be a thousand cuts.Given the comment was about charters interview and he stated he didnt believe his comments would incriminate Essendon players I think youre wrong
Plus
@RobedSinners:" The evidence I'll give shouldn't incriminate #Essendon players" Shane Charters on @3aw693
He also said he hoped Essendon players were cleared but realised that was ASADAs call.
Conspiracy theories aboundAll they need is for Kyle Reimers to talk, but it seems like the AFL have slapped a gag on him.
That's got me stumped too. He's likely got some people staring him down. Hopefully he has the guts to come forth like Charters did.How can they not interview Reimers?
Given the comment was about charters interview and he stated he didnt believe his comments would incriminate Essendon players I think youre wrong