Simpkin elevated

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

DanA said:
List changes have a direct influence on the draft and trading. Hence it is partially relevant

This kid's elevation is NOT going to influence any drafts or trades this week - FACT.

It is therefore irrelevant to this Forum. :rolleyes:
 
Phil McCrackin said:
This kid's elevation is NOT going to influence any drafts or trades this week - FACT.

It is therefore irrelevant to this Forum. :rolleyes:
So you reckon the thread on the super 16 team trade should stay then? Relax, it aint Starlag 13 here mate.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

It is important because Hawthorn were demanding he be thrown into their Everitt for Melceski, Hall, Goodes, Kennelly and picks 15,33,49 deal.

The deal may fall over now.

The Thornton deal is off too, Hawthorn were going to give that pick 49 they got in the above deal to Carlton for Thornton.
 
turbo182 said:
Oi idiot. Respect the guys who are here all season.

It's relevant enough.

You want people to respect others, but call someone an idiot in the process.

You think it relevant then fine, I don't.

What's the length of time someone's been registered go to do with anything? Does that mean that you can't disagree with anyone that's 'been here all year'? :rolleyes:
 
Peacock said:
It is important because Hawthorn were demanding he be thrown into their Everitt for Melceski, Hall, Goodes, Kennelly and picks 15,33,49 deal.

The deal may fall over now.

This will also effect the Thornton deal as Hawthorn won't entertain offering anything other than pick 49.

Ah I see. :D

I take it all back then. ;)
 
Phil McCrackin said:
You want people to respect others, but call someone an idiot in the process.

You think it relevant then fine, I don't.

What's the length of time someone's been registered go to do with anything? Does that mean that you can't disagree with anyone that's 'been here all year'? :rolleyes:

I showed plenty of respect to you. I could have called you a lot worse.

It's got nothing to do with length of time registered. Sinepri has been posting on drafts and trading all year, not like majority of people here for the one week sale. Surely if you've been here longer then 2 weeks you would have known that list management is discussed here.
 
turbo182 said:
I showed plenty of respect to you. I could have called you a lot worse.

It's got nothing to do with length of time registered. Sinepri has been posting on drafts and trading all year, not like majority of people here for the one week sale. Surely if you've been here longer then 2 weeks you would have known that list management is discussed here.

Bothered.
 
It has happened, was a story on it in the Colac Herald (where he's from).
 
grimlock said:
Unlikely as the club would need to know how many (and what) draft picks it has and what it plans to use, versus promoting rookies.

They may already have decided how many they wish to cut and probably have a good idea of how many players they intend to draft, irrespective of what picks they land up with. And the only trade action the Swans seem likely to be involved in is the Spider deal.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Simpkin elevated

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top