Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yep , the prosecution convenes the grand jury and the defence cannot cross examine evidence or submit their own argument or provide witnesses. It is a prosecution process to present evidenceWhat do you mean?
It isnt the defence that brings a GJ in its the prosecution's play.
This will be a death penalty case, and one of the county's only death penalty qualified public defence attorneys is his assigned lawyer for that reason.Trying to avoid the death penalty?
Did you see that the prosecution has provided them with something like 10,000 pages of reports and other documents, 10,000 photographs, 9,000 tips and 51 terabytes of video / audio files...So Emily D Baker and Tragos Law have said it'll be better to ask for the quick trial if they were defending Kohberger.
Let's see.
Yep , the prosecution convenes the grand jury and the defence cannot cross examine evidence or submit their own argument or provide witnesses. It is a prosecution process to present evidence
Did you see that the prosecution has provided them with something like 10,000 pages of reports and other documents, 10,000 photographs, 9,000 tips and 51 terabytes of video / audio files...
Thats a massive amount of info to process...
This will be a death penalty case, and one of the county's only death penalty qualified public defence attorneys is his assigned lawyer for that reason.
What do you mean?
It isnt the defence that brings a GJ in its the prosecution's play.
Listening to a podcast where Bob Motta, defense attorney and host of the Defense Diaries who thinks Bryan Kohberger has a defense. He's suggesting the hours when the surviving roommates were in the house and all over the crime scene possibly with their friends coming and going, will play heavily through the trial, particularly in relation to how the knife sheath might have ended up in the bedroom.
Where the sheath was in the upstairs bedroom I think may be a bit odd. It was just lying there staring at the cops when they walked through the door. Not caught up in the bedding, on the floor or kicked under the bed as I might expect through a fight, the way I read it was that it may look as if it was placed there afterwards.
He says that the house was a well known 'rave' house and that Kohberger may say for example, that he gets his drugs there and whoever he gets them off leaves the back door open for him, that he entered the house and realised what had gone on, fled in a panic.
Edit: I suppose if he can get the knife sheath thrown out of evidence due to crime scene contamination issues he may have a chance.
That's all things the defence could very well look at but with the media circus this has generated I'm not sure there's an untainted jury pool out there. Regardless of what they bring up this town wants justice.
Am not suggesting he's innocent either.
2am Melb time the hearing is set to start.
Anybody staying up to watch? I don't believe there's a live stream but there will be a pool feed that will be replayed right after.
Am sure there'll be plenty of activity regardless.
Thought about it but it'll be, for lack of a better term, boring. May as well just watch it in the morning.2am Melb time the hearing is set to start.
Anybody staying up to watch? I don't believe there's a live stream but there will be a pool feed that will be replayed right after.
Am sure there'll be plenty of activity regardless.
Thought about it but it'll be, for lack of a better term, boring. May as well just watch it in the morning.
Im pretty sure there was a lone male DNA left on the sheath button which later came back to being Kohbergers. I get that its not an absolute, but it will take some explaining that a knife sheath with his DNA was left at the scene.Yeah I'm not suggesting he's innocent either. Regards that knife sheath, I'm wondering if someone else found it in the bedroom and picked it up, placing it on the bed. Perhaps one of the housemates. If they did, I'm not sure that would be grounds for exclusion provided whoever did it, fessed up.
I read that defence didn't waive speedy trial, yet, because they now have to be given evidence prosecution has. Once given evidence they can then request a trial at a later date. So I guess we'll see what happens